I'd say its fair to say United have been the better team but not by a large margin. The xg of 0.53 vs 0.1 would back that up I'd say. Not nearly the one sided game the matchday thread and some would say either.I wouldn't say you've done enough to be much better than them.
Because despite united’s chances you can’t overlook 70% possession. united cannot hold the ball but have had great chances that were squandered whilst City are controlling possession completely but can’t score or even create chances. Even as you can get. If Rashford stays out City are prob gonna shade itHaving more possession and doing nothing with it doesn’t cancel out multiple good chances.
I honestly don’t understand how anyone can have watched that 45 mins and call it even.
I don't think saying it's been pretty even is particularly controversial though either!I'd say its fair to say United have been the better team but not by a large margin. The xg of 0.53 vs 0.1 would back that up I'd say. Not nearly the one sided game the matchday thread and some would say either.
Sadly, yeah. AWB will get some blame, but with Haaland lurking that was going to be a goal anyway.City have dominated this half, well deserved goal.
Yeah, bizarre. I want United to win but that doesn't seem fair.You can't give a goal for that how the feck is he not interfering with play. Disgrace.
two players had to mark rashford, I don't think that should have stood.You can't give a goal for that how the feck is he not interfering with play. Disgrace. He literally shapes to shoot the ball.
If Rashford hadn't shaped to shoot with his left I'd have said its subjective but that was clear.two players had to mark rashford, I don't think that should have stood.
What's happened to Dias? He played all the games for Portugal in the World cup so bit odd he's been injured either side of it. Laporte still only on the bench.City had a good half hour in the second half, their defenders are crap
Dias is injured. He already played injured against Marocco and aggravated the injury. Partially also explains why he was crap in the WC.What's happened to Dias? He played all the games for Portugal in the World cup so bit odd he's been injured either side of it. Laporte still only on the bench.
Ake-Akanji combination isn't winning you the league.
Fair enough, Laporte?Dias is injured. He already played injured against Marocco and aggravated the injury. Partially also explains why he was crap in the WC.
So a completely disgraceful decision on the first goal might well decide the outcome of a title race for City. Unreal
Ah well, we didn't do enough to win but didn't deserve to lose either, shocking decision to turn the game (decide the title race?) but thats what happens if you don't create chances.
Laporte has been shocking this season, I thought Ake was fine today, most United damage was done down the right. Don't think the cb's were the problem at all. Fullbacks again defensively.Fair enough, Laporte?
No way that goal should stand, however, unfortunately, like the Salah goal against Wolves and the Coady goal against us this part of offside is completely broken so in a way its the 'correct' decision. Fortunately Pep will now scream bloody murder and it will be fixed just like Klopp fixed us getting penalties.You can't give a goal for that how the feck is he not interfering with play. Disgrace. He literally shapes to shoot the ball.
tis what it is buddy, annoyed and all as I was, no changing it now. enjoy the 3 points.No way that goal should stand, however, unfortunately, like the Salah goal against Wolves and the Coady goal against us this part of offside is completely broken so in a way its the 'correct' decision. Fortunately Pep will now scream bloody murder and it will be fixed just like Klopp fixed us getting penalties.