prateik
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2005
- Messages
- 42,182
Not a pen.. and Richarlason stopped during the run up.. everything about it was wrong. what the actual feck.
Nah he did his jobDisgraceful refereeing.
We gotta sign ourselves some double amputees to play in defence.Wow another ridiculous penalty.
what the hell is football coming to
It’s actually not. It’s technically great refereeing, because the job of the referee is to enforce the rules.Disgraceful refereeing.
You can stop during a run up. Since when is that not a thing? What you cant do is stop once you've started your shooting motion which is what Neymar used to do back in the day and eventually had to stop it.Not a pen.. and Richarlason stopped during the run up.. everything about it was wrong. what the actual feck.
The problem is the new handball rules, it does not consider intent by a player.No. Nothing in the re-wording of the rules makes that a penalty.
Ah. ok. thought it wasnt allowed. checked the rules.. feinting during the run up is fine.You can stop during a run up. Since when is that not a thing? What you cant do is stop once you've started your shooting motion which is what Neymar used to do back in the day and eventually had to stop it.
You're the the 4th person who said this, making me doubt myself, but I honestly don't get it.It’s actually not. It’s technically great refereeing, because the job of the referee is to enforce the rules.
Its the handball rule that is disgraceful.
Which part of that makes it handball?Handling the ball For the purposes of determining handball offences, the upper boundary of the arm is in line with the bottom of the armpit.
It is an offence if a player:
-deliberately touches the ball with their hand/arm, including moving the hand/arm towards the ball
-scores in the opponents’ goal directly from their hand/arm, even if accidental, including by the goalkeeper
- after the ball has touched their or a team-mate’s hand/arm, even if accidental, immediately:
-scores in the opponents’ goal
-creates a goal-scoring opportunity
- touches the ball with their hand/arm when:
-the hand/arm has made their body unnaturally bigger
-the hand/arm is above/beyond their shoulder level (unless the player deliberately plays the ball which then touches their hand/arm)
The above offences apply even if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm directly from the head or body (including the foot) of another player who is close. Except for the above offences, it is not an offence if the ball touches a player’s hand/arm: Laws of the Game 2020/21 | Law 12 | Fouls and Misconduct No handball Handball 105 106 107 • directly from the player’s own head or body (including the foot) • directly from the head or body (including the foot) of another player who is close • if the hand/arm is close to the body and does not make the body unnaturally bigger • when a player falls and the hand/arm is between the body and the ground to support the body, but not extended laterally or vertically away from the body The goalkeeper has the same restrictions on handling the ball as any other player outside the penalty area. If the goalkeeper handles the ball inside their penalty area when not permitted to do so, an indirect free kick is awarded but there is no disciplinary sanction. However, if the offence is playing the ball a second time (with or without the hand/arm) after a restart before it touches another player, the goalkeeper must be sanctioned if the offence stops a promising attack or denies an opponent or the opposing team a goal or an obvious goal-scoring opportunity.
You love to see it.Palace bitching because they have a penalty awarded against them for dodgy handball
The interpretation has to have been that both Lindelhof and Ward made their bodies unnaturally bigger. I don't think that's fair in either case but it can't be anything else.You're the the 4th person who said this, making me dount myself, but I honestly don't get it.
Here's the handball rule straight out of the 20/20 laws of the game:
Which part of that makes it handball?
I'd say he has not made his body untaurally bigger, his arm is exactly exactly where you'd expect it to be for balance etc. and that he hasn't deliberately touched it with his hand/arm. His arm is obviously not above shoulder height.
Agreed. The referees have meetings after each weekend so they'll have discussed the Lindelof incident. Their collective interpretation of the law seems to be that what both players did is making the body unnaturally bigger. It's obviously bullshit and not fair so there will probably be another change of rules for next season.The interpretation has to have been that both Lindelhof and Ward made their bodies unnaturally bigger. I don't think that's fair in either case but it can't be anything else.
It's exactly what you pointed out. Making the body "unnaturally" bigger. Apparently your hand has to be close to your body silhouette as if extending your body shape outwards. Once your hand is in its own position and the ball hits it, then it's considered hand ball. I personally feel like this rule is an awful one because in this case, we can see that clearly his position is as natural as they come at least when it comes to defending. Whats going to end up happening is that everyone in the box will start to put their hands behind their backs even if it's not the natural thing to do for balance and maneuverability.You're the the 4th person who said this, making me doubt myself, but I honestly don't get it.
Here's the handball rule straight out of the 20/20 laws of the game:
Which part of that makes it handball?
I'd say he has not made his body untaurally bigger, his arm is exactly exactly where you'd expect it to be for balance etc. and that he hasn't deliberately touched it with his hand/arm. His arm is obviously not above shoulder height.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Interesting... a 36-yr old Thiago Silva walks straight into the team as captain.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Nah, he played on Weds and was not captain. He's earned it.Interesting... a 36-yr old Thiago Silva walks straight into the team as captain.
Was suspended against Barnsley.Wait, how is Christensen playing? He got red carded against Liverpool?
Served his suspension in the Carabao Cup?Wait, how is Christensen playing? He got red carded against Liverpool?
To be fair, 23 of your summer signings doesn't seem to be match fitFour academy players playing today, one selected over the club captain.
These post predicting us to suddenly start ignoring them aren't ageing well so far!
Ah, forgot that.Was suspended against Barnsley.
To be fair, 23 of your summer signings doesn't seem to be match fit
In his contract?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Interesting to see Silva as captain (it's usually Azpi or Jorginho).
I very much doubt it. He was not captain the other day.In his contract?
I get your point but he has played like 200 minutes since March or something ridiculousIt's so unfair. 100% of your signings are fit!
My Willy is always my captain .I very much doubt it. He was not captain the other day.
There's not really any other "captains" in that side today. Maybe Willy?
GK as captain is silly. Thiago has biggest influence on that pitch i suspect. Decent choiceI very much doubt it. He was not captain the other day.
There's not really any other "captains" in that side today. Maybe Willy?