His taste in music is pretty amazing. Especially for a footballer/ex footballer.
Especially for a footballer from these islands maybe. Some foreign footballers even like books.
His taste in music is pretty amazing. Especially for a footballer/ex footballer.
He's not really.Simon Jordan is the Jeremy Clarkson of football punditry. Which is a bad thing, just in case there was any doubt!
I used to like the podcast but find Rushden has become insufferable with his moralizing, even when I'm sympathetic to whatever cause he's digressing on. Glendenning sounds tired of it all. Lars Sivertsen and Sid Lowe are highlights when they're on simply because they seem really into football more than anything else.So this thread looks like it will become my inner monologue.
Anyway this episode of Football Weekly has a rather uncomfortable discussion at the end involving the aforementioned Glendenning. He apparently made some glib comments on mental health on Twitter and Max Rushden seemed quite offended and decided they should discuss it on the podcast.
Yeah I don’t won’t go derail the thread but agree with you. That part of the podcast was just annoying and pure guardian brain.I used to like the podcast but find Rushden has become insufferable with his moralizing, even when I'm sympathetic to whatever cause he's digressing on. Glendenning sounds tired of it all. Lars Sivertsen and Sid Lowe are highlights when they're on simply because they seem really into football more than anything else.
I'll give you another name who was great for CL Brian Moore.On a semi related note I remember the days of one UCL game on ITV and another on ITV2 and it was usually Tyldesley on the former and Jon Champion on the latter and i swear they have pretty identical voices, use to spin me out whenever I flicked between both games
Agreed. Max Rushden seems extremely prone to giving moral lectures and Glendenning comes across as someone who actually dislikes football. Jonathan Wilson and Side Lowe and great when they're on.I used to like the podcast but find Rushden has become insufferable with his moralizing, even when I'm sympathetic to whatever cause he's digressing on. Glendenning sounds tired of it all. Lars Sivertsen and Sid Lowe are highlights when they're on simply because they seem really into football more than anything else.
He's smug and arrogant and I find he has little to add but deliberate controversy and judgement.He's not really.
He's highly opinionated, but he speaks from a position of largely unrivalled experience (what other full time pundits have run a PL football club in the modern era for several years?)
I don't always agree with him, but I always think he's worth listening to because he usually speaks with a sharp logic, attempts to view problems from the viewpoint of others and is fantastic at articulating nuanced positions.
He's nothing like Clarkson tbh, I find that a strange comparison.
I can't dislike Rushden because he seems so nice but he's incredibly boring. He does have the required humility to facilitate all the rotating opinionated guests.Yeah I don’t won’t go derail the thread but agree with you. That part of the podcast was just annoying and pure guardian brain.
I admit that is tiresome but when he focuses on the football he's actually pretty good.Does he manage to get any football analysis in between telling us how clever and not your average footballer type he is?
I agree, Jordan is one of those blokes that puts on a face of neutrality but it's his opinion or no opinion. Very arrogant and because he uses big words and sentences he fools people into thinking he's talking sense when the content of what he is saying is full of shite.He's smug and arrogant and I find he has little to add but deliberate controversy and judgement.
He's a football administrator who ran a club into administration. What next, Ed Woodward on Match of The Day?
You're obviously not his only fan, but he just really irritates me. But lots of people do
Sid Lowe got his own Podcast which is quite insightful albeit heavily weighted towards LaLigaSimon Jordan is the Jeremy Clarkson of football punditry. Which is a bad thing, just in case there was any doubt!
Sid Lowe id good, but not heard a peep from him in a while.
I agree he can come across as smug and arrogant. But that's largely because he doesn't try to hide who or what he is and speaks with an open mind. This is in contrast to most other pundits, who are political and often alter what they say because it conflicts with a particular agenda they are pursuing. For instance, Neville is always reluctant to criticise English players and everyone knows why. Jordan not only doesn't engage in that kind of behaviour, he calls it out when he sees it. And that in itself makes him worth listening to.He's smug and arrogant and I find he has little to add but deliberate controversy and judgement.
He's a football administrator who ran a club into administration. What next, Ed Woodward on Match of The Day?
You're obviously not his only fan, but he just really irritates me. But lots of people do
Yeah, opinions are interesting a someone said above. I disliked him from the first time I heard him, it's possibly some prejudice of mine triggered by him.I agree he can come across as smug and arrogant. But that's largely because he doesn't try to hide who or what he is and speaks with an open mind. This is in contrast to most other pundits, who are political and often alter what they say because it conflicts with a particular agenda they are pursuing. For instance, Neville is always reluctant to criticise English players and everyone knows why. Jordan not only doesn't engage in that kind of behaviour, he calls it out when he sees it. And that in itself makes him worth listening to.
I don't think he's without fault, he's gone down some daft rabbit holes in the past but imo he's a hell of a lot better than the average pundit (not a high bar in fairness).
I agree you with that Rushden seems like a nice bloke and the mundane middle of road presenters are underrated on these types of shows, as without them it turns into a group of people talking over each and bouncing from one topic to another.I can't dislike Rushden because he seems so nice but he's incredibly boring. He does have the required humility to facilitate all the rotating opinionated guests.
Oh I was talking about the mental health discussion. While Glendenning apologising for his clearly harmless tweet was funny(Tbh I wished he said it in a sarcastic voice). Rushden view that maybe it was wrong to even respond to the tweet was annoying as piss.Are you talking about the clip above? I found it hilarious, I'd say the off air discussion that led to that was a hoot. Or just his moralising in general? I find him easy to ignore to be honest.
He took over for Arlo White for Peacock. It's like eating a filet after eating shite for a few years.Peter the Poet Drury is the best commentator around. Manolas the Greek god of Rome was unbelievable commentary.
In terms of co, no one really stands out but I think Andy Hinchcliffe and Don Goodman are very underrated.
Where does Stephen Howson fall under as a label? To me he’s one of the best.After Lawro confirming many peoples suspicions that he is in fact an idiot what other pundits do you love or hate and why?
I’m a bit in love with Barney Ronay, one of the best writers about at the moment, on any subject. I’m not sure if I agree with him all the time or that he has duped me with his lovely writing.
I also like Jonathan Wilson, I don’t always agree but do find his reasoning very entertaining. Marina Hyde (on non-football too) is pretty spot on and again, can write.
On the flip side I find any podcast with Alyson Rudd unbearable , her continuous whiney scouse love is excruciating and I wish Barry Glendenning would feck off, he’s like an annoying guy in the pub, just repeating what the last person he forced into conversation said.
Special note to RTE for this new wave of Irish commentators for League of Ireland games: get people who can speak please and don't confuse inarticulacy with regional accents. Kenny Cunningham has a Dublin accent but can speak.
Who and why do you love / hate?
Yeah, maybe we need to find a balance between it's good to talk and broadcasting it to the world for attention, but I definitely think it's better to suffer a few performative announcements as the price for it being a discussion point and not buried and silently ruining and costing lives. Also yes, the public sympathy/empathy is no substitute for proper structure and accessible support.Oh I was talking about the mental health discussion. While Glendenning apologising for his clearly harmless tweet was funny(Tbh I wished he said it in a sarcastic voice). Rushden view that maybe it was wrong to even respond to the tweet was annoying as piss.
As I get older I’m starting to hate the “It’s important to talk about mental health openly” shtick. Its all so empty and really just a substitute for not realising the issues with mental health for the most part are cuts to government support.
Also imo the tweeting about anxiety or panic attacks is all very performative. When I’ve had very bad moments of anxiety/panic attacks, it’s never came into my mind that I should live tweet it. Yet because of the “libs” we have to pretend it’s actually something very brave and not stupid/self-indulgent.
I might be showing my age but his desire to be loved and how impressed he is with himself and who he knows makes me dislike him. He shouts too much and openly craves likes for his channel.Where does Stephen Howson fall under as a label? To me he’s one of the best.
Where is the tifo podcast available? Is it only if you’re subscribed?The Tifo Football Podcast is my personal favorite even if it only comes out once a week unlike Football Weekly and the Totally Football Show. Seb Stafford Bloor, JJ Bull and John Mackenzie are all very knowledgeable and not full of themselves like Glendenning and Jonathan Wilson. Joe Devine is a great host as well.
But his detail to numbers and his scouting ability is greet. If we would have listened to him on many transfers we would have saved a ton of money. We finally have a manager who develops players and we got to be a lot smarter with our transfers.I might be showing my age but his desire to be loved and how impressed he is with himself and who he knows makes me dislike him. He shouts too much and openly craves likes for his channel.
I often wonder what would Brian Clough think. And Cloughy would hate Howson, so that's good enough for me.
I actually never wonder what Cloughy would think, it was just an excuse to crowbar him grilling Motty in.
I agree with your comments on mental health. It feels like every podcast has to try and shoehorn some form of mental health angle into the discussion with every guest and it does sometimes come across as them doing it just to say they have rather than sincerely caring about it.I agree you with that Rushden seems like a nice bloke and the mundane middle of road presenters are underrated on these types of shows, as without them it turns into a group of people talking over each and bouncing from one topic to another.
Oh I was talking about the mental health discussion. While Glendenning apologising for his clearly harmless tweet was funny(Tbh I wished he said it in a sarcastic voice). Rushden view that maybe it was wrong to even respond to the tweet was annoying as piss.
As I get older I’m starting to hate the “It’s important to talk about mental health openly” shtick. Its all so empty and really just a substitute for not realising the issues with mental health for the most part are cuts to government support.
Also imo the tweeting about anxiety or panic attacks is all very performative. When I’ve had very bad moments of anxiety/panic attacks, it’s never came into my mind that I should live tweet it. Yet because of the “libs” we have to pretend it’s actually something very brave and not stupid/self-indulgent.
DI think it's knowing that we haven't at the moment got the collective power to change things for the better, so people the only thing they can do is to say at least something. Imo it's less meaningfully but useless.I agree with your comments on mental health. It feels like every podcast has to try and shoehorn some form of mental health angle into the discussion with every guest and it does sometimes come across as them doing it just to say they have rather than sincerely caring about it.
I can't recall a single interesting thing Henry has ever said and Richards is just an annoying blowhard. Keane is wonderful though I could watch him for hours. Extremely intriguing person.Our ex players are the worst. Scholes and Neville are big annoying hypocrites who just moan, moan, moan and moan. Rio talking nonsense most of times too.
Carra, Owen and Souness are biased as feck towards Pool because of which you can't take them serious.
Henry, Micah and Keane stand out as good pundits for me
I can't recall a single interesting thing Henry has ever said
The book is worth a read.Interesting conversation.
I can't recall a single interesting thing Henry has ever said and Richards is just an annoying blowhard. Keane is wonderful though I could watch him for hours. Extremely intriguing person.