Red Star One
Full Member
Imagine how many people would come to see a newly established Museum of Abolished Monarchy.
yeah but would people be as interested in those buildings without the story that the royal family are actively living there? like, i enjoy watching a porno as much as the next person, what i’m not interested in however is a video of a bedroom or a leaky tap and a man pointing and going “people used to have sex here, but they’re not right now.”But that's a specific building that you acctually can see. Nobody comes to London and actually sees the Queen or Charles etc. They see Buckingham Palace, the tower of London etc. All of which remains even if the Royal family were to disappear tomorrow.
I'm anti as well but I was still interested to see what happened, the support from common-folk like myself and the opportunity to shout at the screen and criticise. I spent a lot of time looking for my work people in the crowds but to understand overall a thing you hate you need to educate yourself too. I'm not saying you have to, or even watch the whole thing but you can laugh at something like yesterday without hating people with different opinions. We can't demand to be heard if we're completely ignorant on the topic.Not particularly. It's not like there's going to be anything new there. I'm also an anti monarchist. Nothing I see at her funeral is going to change my opinion either way. I'm still going to think they're a ridiculous relic who should be done away with and who are a massive waste of tax money. I'm still going to think that the pomp and circumstance looks silly in the modern era. There's not going to be anything new there.
So why make myself annoyed by watching it? It doesn't make any sense in my mind. Do something enjoyable with your friends or family instead.
Top post. I hate the leeches by the way. But this thread is sumptuous...I don't think that's what people are 'getting offended' by to be honest.
It's the slightly strange spectacle of people hating the entire thing and making themselves even angrier by watching it. And then coming on here to complain about how ridiculous the funeral or procession to see her coffin is etc.
I watched none of the funeral. I watched none of that ridiculous queue, interviews with gormless crying members of the public, documentaries about how 'Lizzie' was so lovely and down to earth and funny. I didn't read about the procession or any news about it, other than the first day. In fact, I have barely engaged with it but have continued to live a pretty normal life regardless.
Because it wouldn't enrich me in any way and would most likely only cause me annoyance.
So the question then becomes, if someone hates it so much, why engage in it and watch it? It's pointless.
This is totally separate from having discussions about the monarchy as an institution or our country's over the top reaction as a whole over the past week.
Was just writing something along these lines.The reason they don't abolish the monarchy is that they have a symbiotic relationship with the government and bureaucracy of the state. They give each other legitimacy. The government is full of anachronistic ceremonies and silly costumes harking back to centuries past. The judiciary has people in 17th century wigs presiding over 21st century trials. The money has the Queen's head on it. Royal Mint, Royal Mail, Royal Societies, etc. You take away the monarchy then you are on the way to challenging the old boy network that runs every strata of British society.
Would be an odd place to go to avoid unelected leaders.Well you can just feck off to North Korea.
This is probably the best post in the entirety of this thread.I don't think that's what people are 'getting offended' by to be honest.
It's the slightly strange spectacle of people hating the entire thing and making themselves even angrier by watching it. And then coming on here to complain about how ridiculous the funeral or procession to see her coffin is etc.
I watched none of the funeral. I watched none of that ridiculous queue, interviews with gormless crying members of the public, documentaries about how 'Lizzie' was so lovely and down to earth and funny. I didn't read about the procession or any news about it, other than the first day. In fact, I have barely engaged with it but have continued to live a pretty normal life regardless.
Because it wouldn't enrich me in any way and would most likely only cause me annoyance.
So the question then becomes, if someone hates it so much, why engage in it and watch it? It's pointless.
This is totally separate from having discussions about the monarchy as an institution or our country's over the top reaction as a whole over the past week.
Because murderous families and their ilk don't deserve pomp, they deserve comeuppance.I don't think that's what people are 'getting offended' by to be honest.
It's the slightly strange spectacle of people hating the entire thing and making themselves even angrier by watching it. And then coming on here to complain about how ridiculous the funeral or procession to see her coffin is etc.
I watched none of the funeral. I watched none of that ridiculous queue, interviews with gormless crying members of the public, documentaries about how 'Lizzie' was so lovely and down to earth and funny. I didn't read about the procession or any news about it, other than the first day. In fact, I have barely engaged with it but have continued to live a pretty normal life regardless.
Because it wouldn't enrich me in any way and would most likely only cause me annoyance.
So the question then becomes, if someone hates it so much, why engage in it and watch it? It's pointless.
This is totally separate from having discussions about the monarchy as an institution or our country's over the top reaction as a whole over the past week.
I guess its kind of like why on occasion I watch Liverpool games.....in the absolute hope that they get completely decimated.So the question then becomes, if someone hates it so much, why engage in it and watch it? It's pointless.
Yeah I get that. The difference is that when Liverpool (or in my case Arsenal or Chelsea) then race to 3-0 within 25 minutes, I don't carry on watching because it does nothing for me. And along the same lines, I don't tend to watch their games if they're playing Fulham at home because the likelihood of the situation is that they're going to win and I'm not going to get anything positive from those 2 hours of my life. I can think of many many better ways to spend those 2 hours. Tottenham already give me enough grief!I guess its kind of like why on occasion I watch Liverpool games.....in the absolute hope that they get completely decimated.
OK. And how does watching the funeral and then complaining about it on redcafe bring that about?Because murderous families and their ilk don't deserve pomp, they deserve comeuppance.
You're obviously not permanently angry. Get with the times man.OK. And how does watching the funeral and then complaining about it on redcafe bringing that about?
What topic hasn’t been complained about on Redcafe?OK. And how does watching the funeral and then complaining about it on redcafe bringing that about?
But we're not talking about people laughing at it (which is totally fine) though. Why someone would choose to watch something that pisses them off, then go onto a thread that pisses them off to piss themselves off even more?I'm anti as well but I was still interested to see what happened, the support from common-folk like myself and the opportunity to shout at the screen and criticise. I spent a lot of time looking for my work people in the crowds but to understand overall a thing you hate you need to educate yourself too. I'm not saying you have to, or even watch the whole thing but you can laugh at something like yesterday without hating people with different opinions. We can't demand to be heard if we're completely ignorant on the topic.
I've never understood this angle. Voicing dissent is a very important part of change. Very little real change is not based on the grumblings of sections of society.OK. And how does watching the funeral and then complaining about it on redcafe bring that about?
Yes, but missing off the naked dancing girls, human sacrifice and lizard skin shedding weakens your case.But we're not talking about people laughing at it (which is totally fine) though. Why someone would choose to watch something that pisses them off, then go onto a thread that pisses them off to piss themselves off even more?
I also don't think I or most Republicans are ignorant on the topic. Without watching, I know it will have been incredibly formal. I know it will have been very regimented, involving a lot of arcane ceremonies, probably a lot of people in funny uniforms. 'Symbols of power' will have been involved somewhere. There will have been processions, members of the armed forces, the 'top levels' of British society and many members of state fro around the world. Speeches given by members of her clergy and her family. Am I on the right path?
The topic at hand, if we're talking about removal of the monarchy, isn't related to a single day and a funeral. Its related to the facts regarding the benefits they receive, the tax income they get, the exemptions they receive, the ridiculousness of an unelected head of state. Those are the pertinent facts of the debate for me, not the funeral.
If people want to campaign for a Republic, I'm in. I'll sign, I'll vote. Perhaps even protest, though there are causes I care about more if I'm honest. But if people want to just wallow in annoyance and anger, by watching something they have no short term influence over just so they can continue to be annoyed on an internet forum, that doesn't make sense to me. Do something more productive with your time. Let's not pretend that some/ most of the people are watching it because they're researching for upcoming campaigns for republicanism.
I don't think you are in the wrong, I just feel that anyone can feel and do about it the way they want to. With this last week a person may have felt chilled about it all at the beginning, but by the end feeling quite angry about the sheer opulence of it all. For example the graceless behaviour of displaying the examples and tools of power on the top of her coffin. £400 million plus in jewels and precious metals being marched past common people who in 3 or 4 months could be choosing to let their children and themselves go hungry or perpetually cold, and then ill. If I hadn't seen that I don't know whether I could feel that level of anger again. Those people, I'm not mocking them as ordinary folk, but again and again we're sold this 'Our Monarchy - aren't they amazing and so caring' to keep us 'feeling' a warmth towards these parasites. Will they remember this feeling of pride this Winter coming while all of the Monarchy, Lords, Ladies and the rest of the gentry nouveau and old toast themselves on the money they've made from our effort?But we're not talking about people laughing at it (which is totally fine) though. Why someone would choose to watch something that pisses them off, then go onto a thread that pisses them off to piss themselves off even more?
I also don't think I or most Republicans are ignorant on the topic. Without watching, I know it will have been incredibly formal. I know it will have been very regimented, involving a lot of arcane ceremonies, probably a lot of people in funny uniforms. 'Symbols of power' will have been involved somewhere. There will have been processions, members of the armed forces, the 'top levels' of British society and many members of state fro around the world. Speeches given by members of her clergy and her family. Am I on the right path?
The topic at hand, if we're talking about removal of the monarchy, isn't related to a single day and a funeral. Its related to the facts regarding the benefits they receive, the tax income they get, the exemptions they receive, the ridiculousness of an unelected head of state. Those are the pertinent facts of the debate for me, not the funeral.
If people want to campaign for a Republic, I'm in. I'll sign, I'll vote. Perhaps even protest, though there are causes I care about more if I'm honest. But if people want to just wallow in annoyance and anger, by watching something they have no short term influence over just so they can continue to be annoyed on an internet forum, that doesn't make sense to me. Do something more productive with your time. Let's not pretend that some/ most of the people are watching it because they're researching for upcoming campaigns for republicanism.
A good post as usual.I don't think that's what people are 'getting offended' by to be honest.
It's the slightly strange spectacle of people hating the entire thing and making themselves even angrier by watching it. And then coming on here to complain about how ridiculous the funeral or procession to see her coffin is etc.
I watched none of the funeral. I watched none of that ridiculous queue, interviews with gormless crying members of the public, documentaries about how 'Lizzie' was so lovely and down to earth and funny. I didn't read about the procession or any news about it, other than the first day. In fact, I have barely engaged with it but have continued to live a pretty normal life regardless.
Because it wouldn't enrich me in any way and would most likely only cause me annoyance.
So the question then becomes, if someone hates it so much, why engage in it and watch it? It's pointless.
This is totally separate from having discussions about the monarchy as an institution or our country's over the top reaction as a whole over the past week.
It is a very important vehicle for change and as I said, if we were having a conversation about it on the streets, on TV, or even a semi-civilised conversation about it on here (which in fairness, has happened at times), then great, I'm on board.I've never understood this angle. Voicing dissent is a very important part of change. Very little real change is not based on the grumblings of sections of society.
also, it is important to note that colonialism has done damage to countries that we still witness to this day. so it shouldn’t be surprising that a good section of the population finds the entire thing disgusting.I've never understood this angle. Voicing dissent is a very important part of change. Very little real change is not based on the grumblings of sections of society.
Isn't that exactly what you are doing in this thread!? (Actually taking it one step further than watching ).But watching something that you know is going to make you annoyed and with no prospect for immediate or even short/medium term change....what's the point?
No, because I'm not annoyed? I'm having a perfectly civil conversation with multiple other members on the forum, without insults or anger from anyone, about our views on the matter.Isn't that exactly what you are doing in this thread!? (Actually taking it one step further than watching ).
Ah, fair enough, I misinterpreted your posts then, sorry. They came across as if you were slightly annoyed by people being annoyed about it all.No, because I'm not annoyed? I'm having a perfectly civil conversation with multiple other members on the forum, without insults or anger from anyone, about our views on the matter.
Of course anyone can do what they want to. If people are genuinely watching and getting annoyed to hone their anger to bring about change, then superb. I have to say though, I'm not convinced that's actually what's happening!I don't think you are in the wrong, I just feel that anyone can feel and do about it the way they want to. With this last week a person may have felt chilled about it all at the beginning, but by the end feeling quite angry about the sheer opulence of it all. For example the graceless behaviour of displaying the examples and tools of power on the top of her coffin. £400 million plus in jewels and precious metals being marched past common people who in 3 or 4 months could be choosing to let their children and themselves go hungry or perpetually cold, and then ill. If I hadn't seen that I don't know whether I could feel that level of anger again. Those people, I'm not mocking them as ordinary folk, but again and again we're sold this 'Our Monarchy - aren't they amazing and so caring' to keep us 'feeling' a warmth towards these parasites. Will they remember this feeling of pride this Winter coming while all of the Monarchy, Lords, Ladies and the rest of the gentry nouveau and old toast themselves on the money they've made from our effort?
I feel you can do either, you can recharge that white cold anger or choose to hold it within and hope to maintain it. If we really want change we'll need people with both to do whatever is necessary. The discontent was already here but a lot of people will be thinking just how special their monarchy is, how it allowed them to stand out in the cold to watch some processions while the powerful were invited into the Abbey. Now it will take a fresh realisation with some that they are about to be bled white by bosses of Power companies and their shareholders, by the banks that have been bailed out again and again but never paid the money back and yet now the perfect time has arrived to put your mortgage interest rates up!
The processions that will really be important to the common man will be strikes, marches and protests, there won't be any opulence about those.
You're right, but not all humans are that rational.It is a very important vehicle for change and as I said, if we were having a conversation about it on the streets, on TV, or even a semi-civilised conversation about it on here (which in fairness, has happened at times), then great, I'm on board.
But watching something that you know is going to make you annoyed and with no prospect for immediate or even short/medium term change....what's the point?
There's something to be said in life about enjoying yourself and not constantly exposing yourself to shit that's going to make you angry, especially if you're not actually then going to try to do something about it. I've seen people who do that (and I've done it in the past) and it just leads to depression and sometimes a form of paralysis.
I choose to pick my poison and enjoy the time I have outside of those with my friends and family. Otherwise you can whip yourself into a frenzy all day every day about all manner of issues.
100%. The scars of colonialism are far from healed.also, it is important to note that colonialism has done damage to countries that we still witness to this day. so it shouldn’t be surprising that a good section of the population finds the entire thing disgusting.
@2cents, that's fascinating. I haven't read it all yet, but I can recommend pages 17 to 20 of the PDF.Think some here might find this essay interesting - "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the 'Invention of Tradition', c. 1820-1977"
To my mind I don't have a preference, it's a destination not a holiday resort as suchOf course anyone can do what they want to. If people are genuinely watching and getting annoyed to hone their anger to bring about change, then superb. I have to say though, I'm not convinced that's actually what's happening!
Would hope such a realisation comes soon but again, not super optimistic about that.
I want to read that too. I've heard quite a few references to all the ceremony being fairly new, seemingly designed for the media age. I guess in the old days only a few hundred, if that, would see it all, with the commoners getting to see a woodcutting at best.@2cents, that's fascinating. I haven't read it all yet, but I can recommend pages 17 to 20 of the PDF.
If anyone thinks Britain has a long and storied tradition of great pageantry, this absolutely dispels that myth. It's a relatively modern thing, during the last 130 years or so.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
By corollary, why does it please you to give your wealthy betters more money?And people would vote to keep them as they are tomorrow if asked. Must be very frustrating for you.
But, if Charles and William have the survival nous of their ancestors, surely as a minimum they will be thinking about reshaping the institution to become a monarchy more along the Dutch or Scandinavian model?
I've read Charles wants to scale the monarchy down a bit.So after what seems like a year of Huw Edwards speaking somber banalities, what does the future hold for the monarchy? Yesterday felt like the last blast of pre-1914 Europe with its military pageants and full-on Christianity. While I’d like to think we will have a grown up discussion about becoming a republic like Australia or Canada probably will, that’s probably optimistic in our post-Brexit Ruritania. But, if Charles and William have the survival nous of their ancestors, surely as a minimum they will be thinking about reshaping the institution to become a monarchy more along the Dutch or Scandinavian model?
Think some here might find this essay interesting - "The Context, Performance and Meaning of Ritual: The British Monarchy and the 'Invention of Tradition', c. 1820-1977"
I'm impressed you managed to spell most of that correctly, doubly so because you were probably munching on a pastie at the time.Born and bred in England. If some of you lot can't even respect the monarchy you live with, Not under. That's your problem.
Royal Navy
Royal Air force
Royal Army
Why paint this thread with all your jeasous and/or complete toxic comments?
Can always feck off and live in Russia or some shit?
You are probably right because I read another report that the total number was quite a bit higher which seems more likely to me.Is it just me or does that figure seem rather low given that there two non-stop streams of people passing by for 4 1/2 days?
That figure of £102.4m looks bad because there is no context added to it. Here is the breakdown:The footballing eco-system has a much more positive impact on the UK's economy than the Royals ever will. During the 19/20 season (peak Covid and a 'fallow' year by all metrics), the Premier League still had a contribution of close to £8bn to the economy (much of this coming from player wages tax...something that the Royal Family don't pay).
The other things you need to consider is that the oft repeated mantra 'but but the Royal Family bring so much in for toruism!' is more myth than fact. Most estimates put the tourism generated by the Royal Family at around the ~£50m mark:
Whereas the overall cost to 'keep' or 'prop up' the Royal Family comes in around double that amount:
These are eye-watering sums...to essentially sustain a family that provide very little return, and have little to no power. Why not abolish the monarchy, and pay them a civil servants salary if they need to cut a ribbon somewhere? I mean going by yours and other posters comments, that seems to be the main thing that they do.
Now the other thing to mention is that most of the revenues generated by the Royal Family tend to come from admission to various sites. If we were to abolish the Royal Family and make these sites museums or historical places of importance with certain protections, this wouldn't necessarily reduce the income in tourism. People still would come to visit Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle and so on. Off the top of my head, the Royal Family own almost £14bn worth of real estate all divvied up in wider members of the family, which is ridiculous.
It was all absolutely shambolic, it appears. For a long time people despised the monarchs, no-one much cared when they died and nothing was organised well, if at all. Even during Queen Victoria's long reign, people had had enough of her complete withdrawal from public life when she became the Widow of Windsor.I want to read that too. I've heard quite a few references to all the ceremony being fairly new, seemingly designed for the media age. I guess in the old days only a few hundred, if that, would see it all, with the commoners getting to see a woodcutting at best.
Dunno if that's the same in other countries?