What game have you been watching?
Raheem Sterling
- Thread starter MyOnlySolskjaer
- Start date
Mahrez is being bought for a reason.
The only player that's attacking against Sweden, bad misses but some of you posters need to have a word with yourself, some of these posts I'm expecting to be quoted by The Sun.
He had a good half. Even when he's not playing well, he's the best foil for Harry kane in this system.
Playing well today.
Playing well today.
His finishing has been poor but otherwise he's been England's only good attacker.
What the hell are you watching?
Instead of laughing tell me whose been better or offered more. Kane did nothing, Lingard nothing, Alli nothing. Laugh all you want, easily Englands best attacker and the best on the pitch today.What game have you been watching?
One of you tell me, whose offered more, whose made more chances, whose contributed more in an attacking sense?
Way too much knee jerking going on. Done well in the first half.
You might be right if England hadn't have scored a goal that he had nothing to do with.
Does everything else but finish his chances, he's the new Welbeck 
The player who actually scored, perhaps?
Thats one goal from a set piece, thats ridiculous. Tell me whose offered more in an attacking sense for England. Names please.
I think he’s a bit rubbish.
He's been good, it's Dele Alli that's been useless.
He should have scored the offside goal and possibly done better with the other chance, however, he's been England's best player in the first half. Every attacking threat we have had has been as a result of Sterling's play.
So Harry McGuire has been Englands best attacker, ffs... clutching at straws there much.
It's a goal more than Sterling has contributed.
Last edited:
He has been England biggest threat. Everyone else is hiding to a degree. He is making runs with poise but cannot finish
I give up. Harry McGuire Englands best attacker.. Jesus wept...
Poor decision making but can't fault him for a lack of effort.
You asked who has contributed more in an attacking sense. The f*cking player who actually scored.
Interesting so John Stones is a better attacker than Messi yeah?
He's a better player than Rashford but the latter is probably a better finisher. I'd persist with him.
Continue to make shit up.
Why do you even bother?
I know, I’m biased cause I really can’t stand him as a player.
I don’t think he’s played well though, honestly. Getting in to good positions is nothing if you can’t do anything with it. I’d be delighted if he made me eat my words though.
Stating facts is clutching straws? Maguire scored a goal. You said, word for word, that Sterling was literally the only danger England have offered, yet another player scored the goal.
You do know what the word "literally" means, right? It doesn't look like you do.
This is what happens when you say something stupid and get called on it.
Yes, its pathetic the lengths people go to criticise him. Easily Englands best attacking player today, still gets shit. Scoring a goal from a corner is not contributing to the attacking play of the team.
He's been excellent that half. Everything good England do starts with him.
100%
Kane was literally unmarked, offering to bang it in.
Badly worded, contributed more in an attacking sense at the WC than Messi right?
Completely. Miles better today, I really hope he continues at that rate into the space we should get in the second half.
Defending that performance by Sterling. Only on Redcafe.
No it is. It literally is.
And there's the correct use of that word you don't understand.
You should have given up when you said you were going to. This is embarrassing.
Before his knee injuries Welbeck had a good goalscoring record for EnglandDoes everything else but finish his chances, he's the new Welbeck
Will say it again: De Bruyne and co. make him look much better than he is in front of goal. Dribbling is top notch, but the rest is substandard.