- Joined
- Apr 21, 2013
- Messages
- 650
He has been playing bad for a long time now, he has gotten used to it. Let him go to where ever wants, as long as he's not here running into blind ally's.
He is considerably better than Welbeck, and has been ‘more marketable’ than Welbeck for many years, because he is considerably better than Welbeck.You cannot have been watching United during Ferguson's years. I just refuse to believe someone seeing his teams' performances can put Rashford on such a pedestal.
The guy is basically a faster and more marketable Welbeck.
What is this language you're using where last week means last two years?He is considerably better than Welbeck, and has been ‘more marketable’ than Welbeck for many years, because he is considerably better than Welbeck.
But not in the last week, which is what matters.
I'm not sure it will be a panic, it will just be the usual sums they do. Is he marketable? Yes. Is he still quite young? Yes. Is he good on social media and does he play well with sponsors and fans? Yes. Is he currently a United player? Yes.The club will panic and offer him a bumper new deal.
I think this is bit exaggerated for Rashford. Dont think anyone pays that much attention to him outside England.I'm not sure it will be a panic, it will just be the usual sums they do. Is he marketable? Yes. Is he still quite young? Yes. Is he good on social media and does he play well with sponsors and fans? Yes. Is he currently a United player? Yes.
New bumper deal.
Welbeck was a good player for us and rarely let us down in a big game. He just wasn't a finisher but played his heart out for us.He is considerably better than Welbeck, and has been ‘more marketable’ than Welbeck for many years, because he is considerably better than Welbeck.
But not in the last week, which is what matters.
Two seasons ago he posted a 21 goal season and was brilliant, with plenty of talk about our amazing front 3 of Rashford, Martial and Greenwood. Last season he was performing in the main before injury set in. He was the top scorer in the CL until we were eliminated. Your maths is similarly questionable.What is this language you're using where last week means last two years?
Newcastle would probably throw stupid money at him to be the face of their rebuild, if he'd be willing to go there. The obvious issue though is that his main position is also Saint Maximin's main position, and he probably their one current player that they'd be desperate to keep happy.I hope PSG are stupid enough to offer us 60-70m.
But it's enough no to guarantee him an undeserved starting spot or the new contract that his entourage is not so subtly begging for with these leaks that unsurprisingly talk about how long he has left on his deal. Two years ago he was on the up but he let the hype and the manager's indulgence get into his head and these are the results.Two seasons ago he posted a 21 goal season and was brilliant, with plenty of talk about our amazing front 3 of Rashford, Martial and Greenwood. Last season he was performing in the main before injury set in. He was the top scorer in the CL until we were eliminated. Your maths is similarly questionable.
It’s extremely easy to make sweeping statements like ‘he’s been poor for 2 years’ when he is in a terrible spell. He’s had some ups and downs last season in particular, but he’s generally played well and had some injury problems. He’s had a rough 12 months, which have included poor form, some better form, and injuries. I don’t think that’s enough to dismiss him at the age of 24 personally.
Newcastle is a good shout surely.Newcastle would probably throw stupid money at him to be the face of their rebuild, if he'd be willing to go there. The obvious issue though is that his main position is also Saint Maximin's main position, and he probably their one current player that they'd be desperate to keep happy.
Rashford's general form has been poor ever since the lockdown which happened while he was having surgery on his back injury. He still managed to get a good amount of goals and assists for the 12 months following that, but it was obvious that he was getting those final moments despite his poor form, not because he was playing well. Being able to get goals and assists even when you aren't playing well is a great ability in the short-term, but it's not sustainable. Either he was going to kick back into form, or the goals would eventually dry up. Unfortunately not only is it the latter, but his form has gotten even worse.Two seasons ago he posted a 21 goal season and was brilliant, with plenty of talk about our amazing front 3 of Rashford, Martial and Greenwood. Last season he was performing in the main before injury set in. He was the top scorer in the CL until we were eliminated. Your maths is similarly questionable.
It’s extremely easy to make sweeping statements like ‘he’s been poor for 2 years’ when he is in a terrible spell. He’s had some ups and downs last season in particular, but he’s generally played well and had some injury problems. He’s had a rough 12 months, which have included poor form, some better form, and injuries. I don’t think that’s enough to dismiss him at the age of 24 personally.
Some very good points although I wonder how much of his form was down to the system Ole employed and the absolutely rapid counter attacks and transitions we did back then-the ball 'over the top' to Rashford was the go to tactic at times. What i'm saying is, if you play a certain way then Rashford can look very good, but i'm not sure many other times would find the same use for him.Two seasons ago he posted a 21 goal season and was brilliant, with plenty of talk about our amazing front 3 of Rashford, Martial and Greenwood. Last season he was performing in the main before injury set in. He was the top scorer in the CL until we were eliminated. Your maths is similarly questionable.
It’s extremely easy to make sweeping statements like ‘he’s been poor for 2 years’ when he is in a terrible spell. He’s had some ups and downs last season in particular, but he’s generally played well and had some injury problems. He’s had a rough 12 months, which have included poor form, some better form, and injuries. I don’t think that’s enough to dismiss him at the age of 24 personally.
Sit him down and have him watch all his recent games, and then ask again whether he still feels he should start games. Reality check neededBemused
On current form I can't see anyone offering anywhere near that, and PSG have been championing free transfers of late although losing Mbappe could potentially change that track.I hope PSG are stupid enough to offer us 60-70m.
These are not questions I answered or points I contested. I speak against the typical haste to paint him as some sort of terrible, or even average footballer.If he is not playing well he shouldn’t start, and if he leaves he leaves, but we won’t be losing some no-mark if he left and we would easily get more than £50m for him. Even the opening bids would be higher, because he is respected across the continent and considered a top forward.But it's enough no to guarantee him an undeserved starting spot or the new contract that his entourage is not so subtly begging for with these leaks that unsurprisingly talk about how long he has left on his deal. Two years ago he was on the up but he let the hype and the manager's indulgence get into his head and these are the results.
You come on into a derby with your boyhood club under siege, you amble around the pitch like you are Lionel Messi and have the temerity to question the manager's selection? It's fecking nonsense and Ralf's biggest mistake here has been indulging a lot of these underperfomers. At this rate Marcus shouldn't be making the squad given how disinterested he looks when he gets on the pitch.
He is deservedly not starting and he has resorted to nasty leaks, threats and manipulation what does that say about his attitude? Remember this is his boyhood club that has given him the platform to earn fortune and fame and how does he treat the same club when he hasn't been pulling his end of the bargain for over a year?These are not questions I answered or points I contested. I speak against the typical haste to paint him as some sort of terrible, or even average footballer.If he is not playing well he shouldn’t start, and if he leaves he leaves, but we won’t be losing some no-mark if he left and we would easily get more than £50m for him. Even the opening bids would be higher, because he is respected across the continent and considered a top forward.
As I said, to have the conversation today, on the caf, you will read plenty of exaggeration. Today even Danny Welbeck is apparently better! He’s not playing well, but there’s nothing to suggest that once his mind is straight he will not perform again. He’s lost no physical attributes .
This.Cash in while he still has some value if true. Not sure who would want him though.
Who is going to pay that? We would be lucky to get half that.His actual value maybe around 50 mil but we should charge English tax for him. 80 mil at least.
Stuff that wet dreams are made of.Funny how Dave, Sancho and Bruno (our best players) not considering future but players like Ronaldo and Rashford do. Who is next? Maguire? McT?
His team love a good brief