yeah I'd tend to agree.
Oops did I hurt your feeling my princess ?Maybe cause they are all shite innit (jury still out for Sancho) ? Would mind a british core at all if they consist of Kane, Trent, Foden, etc but we ended up with the whiniest ungrateful bunch. And you still havent refuted my point when you defended the british core to death and shit talking other underperformers in the club. Example: if its Rashford it is always injuries, mental health, etc etc why not the same with PogbaRashford has never come close to justifying his current wages and hes not going to agree to take a pay cut is he? Quite what the logic was in giving him obscene wages based on future trajectory was I would love to know. No other club seems to do this. You get a salary that reflects your current level and perhaps a tiny bit for your immediate potential. If you kick on and improve massively then the club will probably want to increase your wages and get you to sign a new contract asap anyway even if your last one was only a year or two earlier.
Its an awful move. Simply from a perspective that its completely unnecessary. The club has fawned over him and bent over backwards for him for years. He has been picked repeatedly when he hasn't deserved it and hes on a salary befitting a player of twice his ability and application.
I guess you see what you want to see because, especially for Pogba there is always 100 reasons for his failings. You've probably picked the worst player to try and make your point.
I think you’re rewriting history a bit there. That front three scored more than the Liverpool front three, under what most now accept was a tactically poor manager. Challenging for titles for a decade with the same front three is literally unheard of, so yes, not many people could see that
Who has at United? We're reportedly giving Sancho 350k a week, that's Salah and Mane salary rolled into one! You play for United, you get obscene wages the sooner people realise this the better and I don't think it's changing anytime soon. As sad as it is to say outside of this season Rashford has been arguably been one of are top performers for the last 2-3 seasons has he not?
I think you're being a tad harsh here. I'm British and I used to love when the majority of the squads we put out had a British core. I remember slating Arsenal for at times not putting out a single British player but that funnily enough came at a time when they were at their peak.
Laugh as much as you want. In the post-Ferguson, we have been constantly struggling with consistency in the attack. One might think that our choices up front may have been a bit guilty for that. Presenting one season is an outlier because, in the long run, their forwards have produced much more. And that what talent is all about: Mainting a high level of performance.I think you’re rewriting history a bit there. That front three scored more than the Liverpool front three, under what most now accept was a tactically poor manager. Challenging for titles for a decade with the same front three is literally unheard of, so yes, not many people could see that
100%. He simply cant understand that our british core suck dog bollox so far. I would not mind if we had Kane, Rice, Foden, Trent, Walker etc as our core as long as they perform well on the pitch. Anyhow british players always come with additional tax too so if they suck and stink the club we are in deep trouble offloading them. And United has a hard time parting with massive flop so far.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
How much would it cost to replace him?
He is already being replaced by Elanga. If we want to upgrade Elanga is another thing, but we shouldn't loose 100 million for Elanga's bench warmer.
70 million that's already been paid for, in the form of Sancho, Elanga and Garnacho.
72m was the Sancho fee + the 350k a week on a 5 year, potentially 6 you're talking upwards of 100m on wages too. There's no way we let Rashford go and go into the new season with a front line of Sancho, Ronaldo (maybe) and Elanga, unless we're content with another year of fighting for top 6.
I mean based on his current form, that's going to be our frontline next season irrespective of whether Rashford stays or goes. If he stays and continues to put on those stinker of performances, then he'll be continuing to warm the bench, albeit with a fatter paycheck.
Slightly pedantic but okay, you get the point.. We would have Sancho, Elanga, Pellistri, Amad and Garnacho as options for the wing. Rashford sale could help fund a much needed CF, or even two if Ronaldo leaves. Rashford on current form combined with his awful work rate and constant PR drama isn't worth the hassle.
Because that's what we do. We extended Smalling, Jones and many others for no apparent reason
How much do you reckon Rashford would go for? As for the rest I'm sorry but it's more than likely 3 of the players you listed there won't see much game time never mind being 1st team players.
Rashford is a Manchester lad. We are and will be his first choice.
50/60 mil, that'll get us the much needed CF I'd like to think. Those 3 players have great potential, I'd rather us play Amad or Pellistri on the right wing (along with Sancho or Elanga) over Rashford, and having Sancho, Elanga and Garnacho as options on the left wing is more than adequate for next season.
This is the key thing here. If anything it might give him the kick up the arse, knowing he has to prove himself to warrant a new deal, or to impress his potential suitors. Give him a new bumper deal after a dreadful 18 months and you've basically disincentivised him from even bothering.
Didn't we sell Smalling to Roma?
Bang on.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
