As soon as he went over to the screen it was obvious he was going to rule out the goal. I still can't believe it though.Because he was told he’d made the wrong decision. That’s when they’re sent to view it.
Ah ok.What i meant is if the ref told VAR he saw it live they would have confirmed the goal instead of sending him to check the monitor
This.If he thinks he deliberately hit him in the face then it has to be a second yellow. If he thinks it was accidental then how is it a foul?
Why is the ref not brought pitch side to watch it? Or judge if pogba gets red for aurier challenge? It's an absolute messShocking that
Minutes earlier Rashford gets wiped out on the edge of the box and the game just carries on.
It happens several times a game. It will happen in second halfThey punished McTominay for his physique.
Both stretched their arm, one caught the shirt and the other a small part of the face.
There was absolutely no intent from Scott and the result was only due to the difference of height.
He saw it. He was watching the action where the ball was the whole time.I don't think the ref saw it live hence why VAR intervened here
It's the only explanation that makes sense
But damn this ref is weird...inconsistent refs are the worst
Thing is, the refs are the VAR. Literally. If you think the refs are incompetent on the pitch then why wouldn't be in the booth? It's the same people doing a different job the may be more or less suited to.VAR isn't the issue. The refs are pathetic.
Hehe. What football really needed was more stoppages to the game, controversy and crap refereeing.Var is brilliant, now we get to wait an age for the incorrect desicion to be made instead of it happening in real time. None of that pesky excitement in the game and just as many shit calls as before. A resounding success.
Feck off.Obvious decision. McT with a challenge that could be a yellow or even red if deemed intentional.
Obvious decision. McT with a challenge that could be a yellow or even red if deemed intentional.
I agree. I dont understand how VAR couldn't be an asset if the officials are decent. Instead, its almost like its made them worse. Its like giving drunk drivers faster cars.VAR has exposed how shit the officials are.
United still had the ball and the incident happened in the build up to Cavani scoring. There were only three passes between the ‘foul’ (it’s not a foul) and United scoring.What constitutes a phase of play? Because McTominay didn’t score the goal, or assist it, or play the pass to the player who did assist it.
You what?Obvious decision. McT with a challenge that could be a yellow or even red if deemed intentional.
I am talking about direct red card.If he thinks he deliberately hit him in the face then it has to be a second yellow. If he thinks it was accidental then how is it a foul?
You're blind.Obvious decision. McT with a challenge that could be a yellow or even red if deemed intentional.
This.VAR has exposed how shit the officials are.
Yeah, but if we kept it for a minute and scored would it be disallowed? Where is the arbitrary line drawn?United still had the ball and the incident happened in the build up to Cavani scoring. There were only three passes between the ‘foul’ (it’s not a foul) and United scoring.
No they can look for a foul in the build up.I am talking about direct red card.
Isn't a VAR rule that ref can re-look at the situation only if possible direct red card is suspected?