Would you want another questionable owner?
Roman Abramovich plans to sell Chelsea | SOLD for £4.25BN
- Thread starter Ali Dia
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) was joined by comedian Ali Woods to look back at the best and worst moments of a rollercoaster season with the annual United Hour Awards.
Has Ten Hag been sacked yet? We're not sure and we hope not, but it's looking more likely as the days pass.
Who should replace him and why is it taking so long to make a decision?
Not sure id take the Saudi's. Unless there is absolutely no link to Saudi govt, which im not sure of, i dont really follow the Saudi govt ins and outs
Frontrunner is still Boehly/Wyss/Goldstein IMO.
Candy's bid i just dont think will come off.
Saudi's highest bidders
Roman s condition to Raine group is politically problematic person should not get the club. So Turkish person won't be qualified. Saudi group I don't know but any way government have to okay the person. Then only sale process will go through. So it will not be much problematic this time in my opinion
Our govt arent involved in who can or cant buy the club, theyll get involved once Raine group ask for the license to complete sale, [once preferred bidder chosen]. and of course to make sure funds go nowhere near Abramovich's accounts
Last edited:
Heh. You funny
Does it matter who the highest bidder is if nobody is getting the money?
may well do in Raine's decision making. along with outlines for future. Only outline road map we have seen was from Candy and Saudi's, admittedly
None of this makes any sense to be honest. Sanction Abramovich (bit shaky there but whatever)... Why can't Chelsea sell tickets again?
But this is my fault for finding logic in a PR motivated crusade
But this is my fault for finding logic in a PR motivated crusade
I don't think we should be allowed to sell them, but I do think it's ridiculous that we have been denied the ability to give them away for free.
Insulting another member
You’re a fecking idiot.
What are you even on about? If other teams want to protest game integrity then let them - why on earth should we as a sanctioned mega-rich club be doing so in an FA Cup away tie against a lower tier side that is 5 hours' drive away?
Utterly ridiculous that we even proposed this. Can only hope Tuchel and the players had nothing to do with it.
Criticise the post but please don't insult the poster. The post is a fecking idiot.
It’s like Glaston never left
There's no way Tuchel or the players would have been anywhere near this ludicrous decision to petition the FA.
Tuchel has generally handled the situation pretty well and I cannot imagine him asking for MFC to close their stadium to their own fans due to Chelsea's owner being thrown out of football.
Sort of. The money is a test. AND a possible safeguard. Romans more important instructions to Raine were things like judging promises to keep increasing funds to academy, being dedicated to developing Stamford bridge and the area around it, etc. if you are going to balk at an additional 400 mil or so… are you the right group for the task?
There is also the creeping possibility of not allowing Roman to forgive the debt. It starts to get complicated here, but a higher dollar amount at sale could theoretically be said to cover fair market value AND the debt, even if Roman never sees the money either way. All of it should go to Ukraine, but you know how governments are once they get their hands on opm.
All of our assets are frozen from being touched by Roman. It would literally be impossible for ticket sales to be used to support an invasion.
We are being denied ticket sales because of the singing incident and the fear of protests that optically would be really, really bad.
So giving away the tickets would defeat the purpose. They just don’t want people in Stamford Bridge.
From what I heard (from 4 different people at the game) the Roman chants were quickly drowned out by the majority but that doesn't suit the narrative that we're all the same.
I mean, could you imagine the comments tarring all of us had it been a minority of Chelsea fans that threw projectiles at Diego Simeone?
It's an autocracy, it's impossible to operate at that level and get that big without strong ties to the government (nothing to do with their ins and outs).
Classic whataboutism
No I'm fed up of being tarred by a minority I'll never meet. As I'm sure you would be but luckily for you you don't have to deal with it.
Fair enough, but you on a rival club forum, you surely must know you going to get abuse from some folk. You seem a decent Chelsea fan but Chelsea as a club and their fans would prob have the worse reputation about in my opinion. You can't understand why they be getting a proper digging at the moment.
As for the last bit, I'm from West Belfast. I know a thing or 2 about being tarred and I know 'whataboutism' very well as well so I totally understand your last sentence
Getting a feeling it'll be the Saudi's now they seem like serious players. I can just see it being spun as:
'This group have no connection with the Saudi Government, Saudi is an important investor in the UK and the purchase will further strengthen our bonds and assure that x amount of jobs will be saved/created'.
In reality, they will pay over the odds and the Government will take the proceeds and plug their financial black hole with it.
'This group have no connection with the Saudi Government, Saudi is an important investor in the UK and the purchase will further strengthen our bonds and assure that x amount of jobs will be saved/created'.
In reality, they will pay over the odds and the Government will take the proceeds and plug their financial black hole with it.
From my own experiences of dealing with Chelsea fans in London, you're the minority.
There is so much I could say nothing would be anything’s I have as applauding RA or trying to dismiss the logic or indeed the justification for the imposition of sanctions they are well justified and well overdue.
The sooner this is all settled the better for football but let’s be honest letting the government anywhere close to a say as to who owns clubs won’t solve issues.
HM Government have painted themselves in a corner. We are desperate as a country for oil for gas, to sell goods and products in reality very very rarely will questions be asked or morals stop deals and whilst I am far from sure that the Saudi bid will be successful I just can’t see how it could be blocked if the individuals pass the fit and proper test which can’t be amended without a majority of clubs and or the FA putting amend wording to their stakeholders at an EGM or anAGM none of which appear to be scheduled even though you could argue they should.
So my question is I guess we talk about changing the requirements in terms of who is fit and proper but who do you ban? Is it footballs responsibility to operate under different rules to other companies , other sporting entities?
The sooner this is all settled the better for football but let’s be honest letting the government anywhere close to a say as to who owns clubs won’t solve issues.
HM Government have painted themselves in a corner. We are desperate as a country for oil for gas, to sell goods and products in reality very very rarely will questions be asked or morals stop deals and whilst I am far from sure that the Saudi bid will be successful I just can’t see how it could be blocked if the individuals pass the fit and proper test which can’t be amended without a majority of clubs and or the FA putting amend wording to their stakeholders at an EGM or anAGM none of which appear to be scheduled even though you could argue they should.
So my question is I guess we talk about changing the requirements in terms of who is fit and proper but who do you ban? Is it footballs responsibility to operate under different rules to other companies , other sporting entities?
It’s odd actually because having been to Liverpool to see both Liverpool and Everton I actually really enjoy going to Goodison the banter and humour did the City proud whereas on the one occasion Anfield( won’t ever go there again ) my wife had to wipe spit off her face and I had abuse levied at me and threats that I have never been subjected to at any other ground either in the UK or come to that Europe and I have been to a fair few.
from a Liverpool supporter that is a bit rich.. Your supporters are vile..
Always spitting at rival supporters, that is an awful habit.
Ken Griffin willing to put money in apparently.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.s...e-griffin-team-up-for-chelsea-fc-bid-12567546
That looks like best bid so far for long term stability.
We don't want anyone linked anywhere near another government....
https://www.google.com/amp/s/news.s...e-griffin-team-up-for-chelsea-fc-bid-12567546
That looks like best bid so far for long term stability.
We don't want anyone linked anywhere near another government....
The Ricketts family have a load of politicians in their family.
Cubs fans seem be all over Chelsea online spaces warning us against his Ricketts family. They hate their owners.
At this point it's not even about getting a good owner, just a different one.
So far, every American group other than Boehly‘s who are bidding to buy us are either cheap spenders (Ricketts of the Cubs) or totally incompetent (Sacramento Kings owner and NY Jets owner).
At this point anyone coming in improves the situation and stabilizes things. But we’ll probably become similar to United, Liverpool (before the past few years) and Arsenal fans who complain nonstop about how our American owners don’t spend.
Both sides have their flaws clearly. All these damn politicians are dirty and always have the same motive and that is personal gain before anything else anyone trying to convince themselves otherwise is truly delusional.
No I agree he deserved punishment if he is involved thats for sure and the dumb people chanting his name should get flack for that as well even Tuchel called them out and last match against Newcastle some tried to start a RA chant but it was quickly drown out but the majority of your hardcore supporters in one of the ends (dont know the name I'm not familiar).
I agree with you and its totally right just take a look at the media whether its journalists from big outlets, pundits, MPs on twitter trying to score points over this but they come off as extremely dumb and insensitive to the actual problem that is Ukraine suffering.
Hypothetically, could Chelsea give away tickets for free at the gate?
Would obviously then have a full stadium and surely it's better than just having loads of empty seats for the same money. Would season ticket holders complain and demand refunds maybe?
Anyway, i have no idea. It might be a law they can't but I can't see anything to suggest it has been explored?
Would obviously then have a full stadium and surely it's better than just having loads of empty seats for the same money. Would season ticket holders complain and demand refunds maybe?
Anyway, i have no idea. It might be a law they can't but I can't see anything to suggest it has been explored?
Me too.It does read like that
Interesting that Ken Griffin has joined with them by himself. Not using Citadel LLC.
But what if those free ticket holders end up buying a pie and a coke? It is all kind of silly at this point. I think Simon Jordan was bang on when he said that they should be allowed to sell merchandise, tickets and everything else as normal and all the proceeds should just be placed in escrow for the next owners. It is not difficult to do.
The Saudi bid seems have to have caused a stir because all of a sudden we're hearing potential separate bidders teaming up to form super consortiums. There was a story today about Nick Candy joining the Boehly group.
Other than the Glazers and in the case of KSE the odd million none of the US owners seem to have worked out a formula that sees the clubs being able to getba return on their interest in PL clubs.
We know that US sport is organised differently and whilst not a franchise I do wonder why so many are interested in shelling out vast sums unless they can see some dosh coming in .
Growth in asset value aside what do they know that we don’t?
It would take a2/3 majority to introduce a wage cap so could 14 clubs be corralled to pass such a restriction? Are the numbers near enough there already ?
Lets just suppose it was set at 70%of net turnover excluding player trading which clubs would go for it if, and a big if , Chelsea are bought out by a US consortium?