Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

Pintu

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Messages
4,247
Location
Sweden
This should fuel the next round of whataboutism over the ensuing pages.
It is not whataboutism to deplore how a tragedy like the one we are seeing in Ukraine instead of making us open our eyes to all the tragedies we've been ignoring (like the one in Yemen), is used to justify this bias and spread racist views like "other people are not civilized, they deserve what's happening to them".


Exactly, he is not the biggest in the class and it suits him to pretend he is the craziest in the class! Make people think he would go nuclear but he won’t. He won’t take on NATO either.

IMO he has calculated that NATO won’t fight directly in Ukraine and he is happy to swap sanctions for UKraine. He either ends up with Ukraine with Russian puppet government or if as I suspect, Ukraine offer too much resistance and he doesn’t fancy ten years of guerrilla war, he will gonto the negotiating table and get what he can, promises from NATO and Ukraine split into two opposing states.
This is his only "good outcome". And it is one he can sell domestically as win. If he wins that war (for the 2 breakout republics) on the ground, I suspect NATO might pressure Ukraine to accept that defeat momentarily (over the medium term, to be reviseted when the regime in Russia starts changing...).

The first option makes no sense, the ukrainian people are not gonna accept a Russian puppet government. And the longer Putin exhausts his occupation army, the more he increases pressure from within while the sanctions keep bleeding Russia.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,990
Location
London
It's currently difficult to see a path to sufficient de escalation that will allow him to maintain control of Russia... And certainly not one that protects what he sees as his legacy

In that context the anaology would be a corners animal ... Dangerously unpredictable

It may be he sees massive escalation is the only thing that might give him an off ramp and judgin his actions by conventional game theory / logic might not be the correct thing to do.

I think this is certainly the most geo politically dangerous situation for a long time 1960s or the fall of the wall I'd say?

I would be very surprised if putin stayed as leader in the medium term ... I would be even more surprised if he was alive after that
I fear so. I fear that we are very close to the point of no return which then has only two possibilities: 1) Putin getting killed or 2) nuclear war.

While the first is the best-case scenario, the second is the worst-case scenario. The trouble is that all the other scenarios in the middle might be permanently lost within the next week.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,702
Location
Hollywood CA
It's currently difficult to see a path to sufficient de escalation that will allow him to maintain control of Russia... And certainly not one that protects what he sees as his legacy

In that context the anaology would be a corners animal ... Dangerously unpredictable

It may be he sees massive escalation is the only thing that might give him an off ramp and judgin his actions by conventional game theory / logic might not be the correct thing to do.

I think this is certainly the most geo politically dangerous situation for a long time 1960s or the fall of the wall I'd say?

I would be very surprised if putin stayed as leader in the medium term ... I would be even more surprised if he was alive after that
Agreed. The one thing that needs to be resolved at this point (which I think will play out of over the next few days) is what Putin's state of mind is after now having been humiliated in Ukraine and in the process having brought the full force sanctions from the US/EU/NATO/Japan/Australia and many other countries to bear on the Russian economy.

  • Is he aware that he has lost a lot of power and negotiating leverage ?
  • How will he process humiliation ?
  • Does he realize that he is perilously close to losing his grip on power in Russia ?
  • How will that affect his calculus on backing down or ramping up to actually considering nukes ?
It seems as though all roads ultimately lead to his removal, in one way or another, as he can never again go back to the world he lived in just 4 days ago.
 

GDaly95

Says he's one of the best posters
Joined
May 1, 2013
Messages
6,343
Location
Wicklow, Ireland
Air raid sirens in Kiev and Dnipro. Apparent amphibious landing in Mariupol. Explosions in Odessa.

 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,575
If they retreat out of the battlefield, we should restore SWIFT connection. There's no need for innocents to have this sort of immediate economic devastation.

The rest of the sanctions can be negotiated but I would really like to see the whole Kremlin out permanently. I've had enough of this.

That said, it seems they are attacking Ukraine even while talks are happening, so feck them.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
I fear so. I fear that we are very close to the point of no return which then has only two possibilities: 1) Putin getting killed or 2) nuclear war.

While the first is the best-case scenario, the second is the worst-case scenario. The trouble is that all the other scenarios in the middle might be permanently lost within the next week.
Any chance we can get somebody to slip some polonium in his coffee
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,413
I fear so. I fear that we are very close to the point of no return which then has only two possibilities: 1) Putin getting killed or 2) nuclear war.

While the first is the best-case scenario, the second is the worst-case scenario. The trouble is that all the other scenarios in the middle might be permanently lost within the next week.
I still don't see option 2 ever happening. All the top brass have families and assets all over Europe and the US. They're hardly going to authorise an attack on their own. All this talk is for me the ramblings of a desperate man who is backed into a corner. He has been forced to show his strongest hand just 4 days into a conflict with a third tier military.

I'd imagine China are mighty pissed off he's bringing nuclear weapons into it too.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,699
If they retreat out of the battlefield, we should restore SWIFT connection. There's no need for innocents to have this sort of immediate economic devastation.

The rest of the sanctions can be negotiated but I would really like to see the whole Kremlin out permanently. I've had enough of this.

That said, it seems they are attacking Ukraine even while talks are happening, so feck them.
You are joking right?

Putin went in full pelt and his agenda is probably to take as much land as he can before sitting on the negotiation table. That being said the damage is done. If even those sanctions don't hold up it means he completely gets away with it.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,990
Location
London
I still don't see option 2 ever happening. All the top brass have families and assets all over Europe and the US. They're hardly going to authorise an attack on their own. All this talk is for me the ramblings of a desperate man who is backed into a corner. He has been forced to show his strongest hand just 4 days into a conflict with a third tier military.

I'd imagine China are mighty pissed off he's bringing nuclear weapons into it too.
I hope you are right. I just think that the percentage for it happening is now non-trivial, although still very low.

I don't think it needs to start with a full-scale attack. A tactical nuke in Ukrainian forces and then we are in uncharted territories.
 

hellhunter

Eurofighter
Joined
Aug 5, 2011
Messages
18,119
Location
Stuttgart, Germany
Supports
Karlsruher SC
You are joking right?

Putin went in full pelt and his agenda is probably to take as much land as he can before sitting on the negotiation table. That being said the damage is done. If even those sanctions don't hold up it means he completely gets away with it.
Agreed, there's also an element of deterring him or his successor from similar actions down the line.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,575
You are joking right?

Putin went in full pelt and his agenda is probably to take as much land as he can before sitting on the negotiation table. That being said the damage is done. If even those sanctions don't hold up it means he completely gets away with it.
If they retreat fully out of Ukraine, the land can be retaken. IF. We should only restore it when we can see they are at least 50km from the border into their own lands
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,471
Location
bin
Can I just say that whoever made the alert on the main page that starts off with "Emergency!" is a massive wanker? Because they are a massive wanker.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
Be interesting to see the trading floors opening moves in around 7 hours time

I'm expecting carnage and some very rich / powerful / pissed of oligarchs and potentially more problematic (for putin) than that is a bunch of the officials who facilitate things in Russia but not ones with access to bespoke Swiss banking arrangements being super pissed off
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,386
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
From the BBC:


Missiles launched into Ukraine from Belarus
Iskander missiles were launched from Belarus into Ukraine around 17:00 (15:00 GMT), an adviser to Ukraine's interior minister says.
It comes after President Zelensky's office announced today that Ukrainian and Russian officials are due to meet for talks on the Belarusian border with Ukraine - although they have not said when.
Anton Herashchenko posted the footage on Facebook.
"Iskanders launched against Ukraine from the vicinity of Mozyr," he wrote. "This means they've brought death somewhere... so this is the kind of ceasefire we have?"

A Ukrainian statement earlier said that Belarusian leader Alexander Lukashenko had "taken responsibility for ensuring that all planes, helicopters and missiles stationed on Belarusian territory remain on the ground during the Ukrainian delegation's travel, talks and return”.
 

Rektsanwalt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
1,573
Supports
Schalke 04
If they retreat fully out of Ukraine, the land can retaken. IF. We should only restore it when we can see they are at least 50km from the border into their own lands
I don't think simply giving up the land again would solve the issues we have with Putin. There's a general problem at hands and in my opinion, we need to make whole Russia feel it.
 

Giggsyking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2013
Messages
8,708
We had 19 years to talk about 2003. Many of us, myself included, have talked about it in many of those 19 years. Some of us lost friends and schoolmates in the aftermath.

Anyone bringing it up 19 years later in a specific thread can not expect others not to think he/she has a specific reason to do so.
Well the main reason for me is to show how people can be hypocritical. As a war sufferer I understand more than anyone in this thread how cruel war can be and I know exactly how the Ukrainian people feel injustice now. They are left alone to fight against Imperialism and expansionism.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,575
I don't think simply giving up the land again would solve the issues we have with Putin. There's a general problem at hands and in my opinion, we need to make whole Russia feel it.
Russia will feel devastation for years to come whether SWIFT is there or not. They must have about 100 sanctions now. SWIFT is just the shock and awe option.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,699
If they retreat fully out of Ukraine, the land can be retaken. IF. We should only restore it when we can see they are at least 50km from the border into their own lands
The land - yes. But the damage to the cities, lives taken, economical damage of the whole country, bridges, airports?

It's way more complicated to just retreat, say excuse me and all bans are lifted.

Also Putin already signed a treaty to recognize the separatists areas...
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,034
The Ukrainians have the world's utmost respect, support and sympathy at the moment. For them to start attacking a pro-Russian region would be extremely unwise IMO.
If you are describing the Donbas especially as pro-Russian, then you may have been watching too much of Russia Today. It has a Russian-speaking majority for sure, but that doesn’t mean the people there prior to the occupation were a majority who identified as Russian and wanted either a separatist republic or to join the Russian Federation.

Russia has no bonafide claims on the territory.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,702
Location
Hollywood CA
Be interesting to see the trading floors opening moves in around 7 hours time

I'm expecting carnage and some very rich / powerful / pissed of oligarchs and potentially more problematic (for putin) than that is a bunch of the officials who facilitate things in Russia but not ones with access to bespoke Swiss banking arrangements being super pissed off
Rub will hit 300 against EUR on Monday no doubt. I see default incoming.
300 along with the compounding effect of all the sanctions would surely plunge the Russian economy into a deep depression. Putin, if he's still vaguely sane, will have to capitulate or else contend with a serious revolt at home.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,575
The land - yes. But the damage to the cities, lives taken, economical damage of the whole country, bridges, airports?

It's way more complicated to just retreat, say excuse me and all bans are lifted.

Also Putin already signed a treaty to recognize the separatists areas...
Not all bans. Just SWIFT.

And he can sign another treaty to unrecognize them I'm sure.