frostbite
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2021
- Messages
- 3,490
I don't know, I am not an expert on this.After listening to several experts on podcasts, it seems like Sweden's Saab Gripen would be the ideal candidate for Ukraine. It's a more rugged aircraft that is meant to operate from highways and short, makeshift runways and rely on less specialized mechanics. Most NATO aircraft are more high maintenance and intended to operate in better conditions than the Gripen. Ukraine could certainly use the F-16s, but, if possible, it seems that a better option would be the Gripen or F-18.
Most American combat aircraft are great, but they are also designed (along with tanks and other vehicles) to operate within parameters that the US and NATO would expect to fight within. Countries like Ukraine or Taiwan can't expect to establish air dominance so they need equipment that is created with those conditions in mind. I think it would be beneficial in the long-term for NATO for countries like Sweden to continue to develop weapons with that in mind.
However, I know that the war is going on for almost a year, and we are supporting Ukraine. I don't understand why we are letting them fight without any air force. Russia is much bigger, has more soldiers, has more planes, has more of everything, and is constantly bombing Ukraine's infrastructure while Ukraine has no response and can only defend itself. If we really want Ukraine to win, and I believe we do want them to win, we have to provide them with some modern aircraft. And with some modern tanks.