AttackingFlair
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 9,654
Well yeah probably because Deco was awesome at the time. But during then I remember most banging on about Ronaldinho and Eto'o, the partnership etc, he was highly rated then for sure.
A complete player, are you having a laugh?I shouldn't bite, but Henry wasn't a complete player? What are you on about?
Henry was an average header, or at least he didn't commit himself to heading the ball much. But every other aspect of his game was absolutely top notch.
A complete player, are you having a laugh?
This is pure semantics as it's not detracting from how effective he was in the EPL, but he was far from complete even at his best. A player that couldn't head the ball to save his life, didn't like being tackled and hated everything unless it went 99% his way can never be called a complete player. He went missing from most of the big games of his career, he is one of the few brilliant players that couldn't be called a complete player. It doesn't surprise me to see you championing him as one.
He's african which means he's probably 42!
It is true though cm, more often than not Henry went missing in the matches that mattered. So for me Eto'o edges it, just.
Eto'o was so much better in big games than Henry it's not even funny.It is true though cm, more often than not Henry went missing in the matches that mattered. So for me Eto'o edges it, just.
Exactly, cesc is just on his Arse bias tripEto'o was so much better in big games than Henry it's not even funny.
Show me some examples please? The one CL Final he played with us where he was isolated and we were a man down for 80 minutes? He was good in that game.It is true though cm, more often than not Henry went missing in the matches that mattered. So for me Eto'o edges it, just.
better than Zlatan?He showed what he was all about for Inter last night, after his tough first season he looks back to his best. That ability to just turn it on, his skill on the ball and the deadly finishing. Eto'o looks back to his best and can anyone believe it, Rafa Benitez deserves some credit.
I think it's good to remember that Eto'o started last season as a striker, playing as a partner with Milito.He was still adapting and he couldn't score as regularly as he does now so Mourinho found a way to use him without playing him in his best position.Even if it helped I don't think Eto'o playing as a wing forward was the key to Inter's success.Eto'o does look extremely sharp.
But Inter lost, and seem to be struggling (in comparison to last season). Now I'm no world class manager, but to me it would seem logical that if you wanted your star striker to start scoring big numbers again you move them inboard, and play them as a striker - not a wide-forward (like last season). Though at what cost? Team balance may be upset, and you can't argue with Mourinho's winning foruma/tactics there at Inter. They won the treble with Eto'o as a wide forward........
Firstly, Henry missed an excellent chance to put the game to bed in that CL final you talking about. Yeah he played well but he needed to bury his chances.Show me some examples please? The one CL Final he played with us where he was isolated and we were a man down for 80 minutes? He was good in that game.
He scored against every big team he played against. He put heaps past your lot. He won us so many matches and scored so many times when we needed it.
He scored over 40 goals in the CL, where he was playing one-out up front all the time against the worlds best defenses. Yes his CL record was worse than his PL record, but when you're contributing a goal a game, every game, you'd expect as much.
It's a ridiculous statement that holds little ground. You're not going to take anything away from Ronaldo because he could only score at Old Trafford now, are you?
Henry was a bit of a bottler though. He was one of the those players who needed the circumstances to go his way for him to do well in the bigger games. Unlike say, a Tevez who despite being nowhere near as good, raises himself for the bigger occasions, and is a proper warrior on the pitch.Show me some examples please? The one CL Final he played with us where he was isolated and we were a man down for 80 minutes? He was good in that game.
He scored against every big team he played against. He put heaps past your lot. He won us so many matches and scored so many times when we needed it.
He scored over 40 goals in the CL, where he was playing one-out up front all the time against the worlds best defenses. Yes his CL record was worse than his PL record, but when you're contributing a goal a game, every game, you'd expect as much.
It's a ridiculous statement that holds little ground. You're not going to take anything away from Ronaldo because he could only score at Old Trafford now, are you?
eto'o isn't a cnut...he's just gangsta. wouldn't you love it if hernandez threatened journos as well?Bump, I honestly think he's a different level to likes of Henry, not in terms of talent but just mentally, he's such a strong player reminds me of Ruud. I'd love Hernandez to turn out like our very own mexican Eto'o without the 'cuntishness' that has sometimes been associated with him.
He thought he was on par with Messi. Pep and Barca didn't agree.i still don't get what the deal with pep was. sure even if eto'o is outspoken, a twattish player (especially a striker of all positions) would not selflessly work like a dog up and down the left flank like he did last season under mourinho.
Well backed up there.No they don't.