Classical Mechanic
Full Member
Spain were around 400 at the same stage.
Deaths are unfortunately among the least relevant statistics at this stage. Good to see a low figure as it means less people died today, but it's the growth of new cases that is most important at this point.The stats for UK are taking a different path to Italy and Spain in the last 4 days. Italy went up by 600 in the same time the UK‘s have gone up 230. It is encouraging but let’s not get excited yet.
Totally agree. Keeping fingers crossed it’s not a one off. All credit to NHS staff.No chickens counted here. One day at a time.
Why is it? New cases is dependent on the amount of testing done. I think people want to see less dead people as the most important marker.Deaths are unfortunately among the least relevant statistics at this stage. Good to see a low figure as it means less people died today, but it's the growth of new cases that is most important at this point.
The same stage as the UK are today? According to that table Spain had 1813 deaths at the same stageSpain were around 400 at the same stage.
Definitely. Good news, though.No chickens counted here. One day at a time.
I’ve been counting since when those countries hit about 200 cases because that’s when the exponential growth really exploded. Handily Italy and the UK were both on 233 at one point.The same stage as the UK are today? According to that table Spain had 1813 deaths at the same stage
My guess is that it would more be to do with logistical factors, demographics and the general health of populations, more those type of things.Definitely. Good news, though.
I think it's several weeks since the handwashing advice first started being transmitted. It definitely seemed to take hold in a lot of people, from what I recall. Hopefully we're seeing the start of something good.
But it'll take a couple more days of levelling off before I start getting optimistic.
Total cases are important because they show whether the control measures are working to slow growth.Why is it? New cases is dependent on the amount of testing done. I think people want to see less dead people as the most important marker.
Yeah. We need more days like today.Definitely. Good news, though.
I think it's been several weeks since the handwashing advice first started being transmitted. It definitely seemed to take hold in a lot of people, from what I recall. Hopefully we're seeing the start of something good.
But it'll take a couple more days of levelling off before I start getting optimistic.
Did you eat and drink, swiftly lifting the mask though?Landed Doha from Phuket.. Very quiet, feels like safest place on planet! But it is 1am. Great service from Qatar Airways so far and Phuket airport was also amazing in terms of hygiene protocols.
Read some terrible reports about Heathrow in UK media today so fear Heathrow covid19 protocols won’t get close to Phuket or Doha airport. Hope Heathrow have sorted out their act by now
Flight is abit surreal. You’re very conscious on covid19 threat, but then get into a movie and forget. But then you suddenly remember about the real threat of infection because you’re wearing a mask.
Inside the mask heats up so feels like nose and mouth are in a permanent sauna, while rest of body is normal! Very strange and annoying sensation!
Yeah I know feck all about the details of this Oxford model but it does seem pretty suspect. One for the epidemiologists to argue about!Sure, average age was 62 I think, so much older than any given country. I think something like 20% had serious symptoms though. That must surely be well in advance of what is predicted for the 60+ age bracket if the Oxford study is modelling a vulnerable population of 1% for society as a whole.
I'm concerned they've retrospectively adapted certain variables in their model order to arrive at something that mirrors the current UK death rate. I would hope they've used the same model to predict how we'll fare over the coming days and weeks.
Deaths much more relevant than cases in the Uk, where they’ve done a fair bit less testing per capita than a lot of other countries.Deaths are unfortunately among the least relevant statistics at this stage. Good to see a low figure as it means less people died today, but it's the growth of new cases that is most important at this point.
Deaths are highly dependend on the demographics (mainly age) of the diseased population. Get a care home infected and you have a dozen new cases on that list.The stats for UK are taking a different path to Italy and Spain in the last 4 days. Italy went up by 600 in the same time the UK‘s have gone up 230. It is encouraging but let’s not get excited yet.
Yeah if you only test really sick people then those people not dying is a big factor.Deaths much more relevant than cases in the Uk, where they’ve done a fair bit less testing per capita than a lot of other countries.
Slight improvement again but still not out of the woods.What’s the news from Italy today?
Right OK, I see. By my reckoning that would still have put Spain on 638, somewhere between Italy and the UK.I’ve been counting since when those countries hit about 200 cases because that’s when the exponential growth really exploded. Handily Italy and the UK were both on 233 at one point.
My guess is that it would more be to do with logistical factors, demographics and the general health of populations, more those type of things.
It's good for headlines but it doesn't tell you much about how the outbreak is progressing, and that's what everybody should be worried about most at the moment. Deaths are never talked about by governments in terms of controlling the outbreak because you can't control them. As long as the testing criteria remains constant it shows you the trend you are in and that's what is being studied.Deaths much more relevant than cases in the Uk, where they’ve done a fair bit less testing per capita than a lot of other countries.
Yes, it's a stupid idea and against the rules (in the UK) so tell them to forget about it.I just wanted to query something regarding social distancing. If a family who is in a house visit another family in a house, and both go no where else, can they still catch Coronavirus if they are going straight from house to house e.g in car and then out of car. Just had a query from someone when we were discussing but didn’t have the answer so just wondered what people thought. We were discussing how the virus could be caught.
Yes! And felt super weirdly vulnerable. Also also-wipes down my tv, seat elbow, and dining tray. Feels utterly bizzare and insane, but maybe it’s a sneak peak into a new reality, just like air travel fundamentally changed after 9/11.Did you eat and drink, swiftly lifting the mask though?
I’d say yes they can catch it, someone in house a could have it asymptomatic and travel and infect house bI just wanted to query something regarding social distancing. If a family who is in a house visit another family in a house, and both go no where else, can they still catch Coronavirus if they are going straight from house to house e.g in car and then out of car. Just had a query from someone when we were discussing but didn’t have the answer so just wondered what people thought. We were discussing how the virus could be caught.
If both families have not left their homes for even one second for the last two weeks, it would be very unlikely anyone of them were exposed/infected. It's not a realistic scenario though.I just wanted to query something regarding social distancing. If a family who is in a house visit another family in a house, and both go no where else, can they still catch Coronavirus if they are going straight from house to house e.g in car and then out of car. Just had a query from someone when we were discussing but didn’t have the answer so just wondered what people thought. We were discussing how the virus could be caught.
Well that fecking sucks. Unbelievable.My friend who works for British steel has basically been told that his job is essential and must keep going, which is fair enough. The thing is he's also been told that if he catches it (already two confirmed cases of people he knows) then he will be sacked.
I would say being on a plane would be one of the safest places from the virus since the air is refreshed every few minutes.Yes! And felt super weirdly vulnerable. Also also-wipes down my tv, seat elbow, and dining tray. Feels utterly bizzare and insane, but maybe it’s a sneak peak into a new reality, just like air travel fundamentally changed after 9/11.
As it’s my first time on a plane during convid19 crisis, it’s all new experiences and have no idea what twists and plots are around the corner!
Hopefully if he is forced to go in against his will he could sue if they sack him for catching the virus. I don't know as I'm not a lawyer.My friend who works for British steel has basically been told that his job is essential and must keep going, which is fair enough. The thing is he's also been told that if he catches it (already two confirmed cases of people he knows) then he will be sacked.
Doesn't it just. Absolutely shocking really.Well that fecking sucks. Unbelievable.
They wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they did that.My friend who works for British steel has basically been told that his job is essential and must keep going, which is fair enough. The thing is he's also been told that if he catches it (already two confirmed cases of people he knows) then he will be sacked.
Not much you can do re drinks on a long haul I guess. Cleaning trays etc is a good move anytime I guess, given people stick their heads and feet on them.Yes! And felt super weirdly vulnerable. Also also-wipes down my tv, seat elbow, and dining tray. Feels utterly bizzare and insane, but maybe it’s a sneak peak into a new reality, just like air travel fundamentally changed after 9/11.
As it’s my first time on a plane during convid19 crisis, it’s all new experiences and have no idea what twists and plots are around the corner!
That's what I also said to him.They wouldn't have a leg to stand on if they did that.
Yeah. It’s not the air that the problem.I would say being on a plane would be one of the safest places from the virus since the air is refreshed every few minutes.
The testing criteria aren’t consistent though. They vary, from country to country, and change over time. To be honest, I think the main reason governments focus on cases rather than deaths is a combination of not wanting to make the problem seem smaller than it is and not wanting to seem too morbid.It's good for headlines but it doesn't tell you much about how the outbreak is progressing, and that's what everybody should be worried about most at the moment. Deaths are never talked about by governments in terms of controlling the outbreak because you can't control them. As long as the testing criteria remains constant it shows you the trend you are in and that's what is being studied.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date