Gehrman
Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2019
- Messages
- 11,220
g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
News in today thoughSome of the FFP3 Respirators and Type IIR masks have been subject to a certified shelf life extension programme with the manufacturer, and should have additional labels with the new expiry date on the boxes.In the management of this stock, it has been considered prudent that Public Health England works with manufacturers to extend the life of their masks where possible. This is through a formal scientific testing programme, including accelerated aging, which allows for appropriate over-labelling with a later expiry date as specified by the manufacturer.
The MHRA has issued an alert telling GPs to throw away batches of facemasks distributed to practices after they were re-labelled with new expiry dates, Pulse has learned.
The Type IIR facemasks from supplier Cardinal Health pose a ‘risk’ to staff wearing the mask if the foam strip on the mask flakes and enters the mouth or airways, said the MHRA after assessing the products.
Practices, which have been using the masks, have now been asked to dispose of them locally. Six out of the seven batches tested did not pass an inspection of the foam strip, according to the alert.
That's old news, reports of that was happening some weeks into the lockdown.So today in PPE-related "things that should be a bigger deal than they will be"
Many NHS staff were supplied with expired surgical facemasks with concealed "best before" stickers on them
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...t-of-date-expiry-cover-stickers-a9447306.html
We were told that they had an extension but were safe after testing, this is from NHS England supply chain website
Very accurate. In short, cooking the numbers for months now. I mean they've not been able to tell us how many people are being tested now, and haven't for nearly a month now.Someone linked to this in The Guardian - not sure how accurate or factual it is, but it's interesting for the wrong reasons nonetheless.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1277960112691273728.html
NHS/workers and publicWhat’s the difference between pillar 1 and pillar 2 data?
Interesting. Thanks. Might be genuine logistical reason why pillar 1 data more readily available than pillar 2?NHS workers and public
These different routes are administered in different ways and that has an influence on how they are reported. Reporting is described in more detail below.
- Pillar 1: swab testing in Public Health England (PHE) labs and NHS hospitals for those with a clinical need, and health and care workers
- Pillar 2: swab testing for the wider population, as set out in government guidance
- Pillar 3: serology testing to show if people have antibodies from having had COVID-19
- Pillar 4: serology and swab testing for national surveillance supported by PHE, ONS, Biobank, universities and other partners to learn more about the prevalence and spread of the virus and for other testing research purposes, for example on the accuracy and ease of use of home testing
Pillar 1 data for England is provided by the NHS and Public Health England, and data from the devolved administrations are provided by the Department of Health of Northern Ireland, the Scottish Government, and Public Health Wales.
Public Health Wales provide combined pillar 1 and pillar 2 data.
Pillar 2 data for the UK (excluding Wales) is collected by commercial partners.
Pillar 3 data is provided for England by NHS England and Improvement (NHSEI).
Pillar 4 data is collected by the NHS, PHE, and individual research study leads for the UK.
Tests in the UK are carried out through a number of different routes. Tests are measured and reported in different ways depending on the route and how they are administered.
All tests in pillar 1 are counted at the point they are processed by a lab. Nose and throat swabs are counted as one sample.
Tests in pillars 2 and 4 are administered in 2 different ways and therefore fall into 2 categories, those that are counted when they are despatched and those that are counted when they are processed by a lab. As in pillar 1, pillar 2 nose and throat swabs are counted as one sample. Pillar 4 tests, depending on the study, either counts swabs or blood samples.
Tests in pillar 3 are counted at the point when they are processed by a lab. Blood samples are taken and processed in laboratories.
Pillar 1 has accuracy which is why they're reporting it. Pillar 2 (drive through and home tests mainly) is double counting people being tested in some cases, both tests carried out and a positive being identified. We also had the fiasco of the government counting a test as something that was in the postal system as well. It suggests that they have no clue of a number in terms of number of people being carried out hence why they're not reporting the data.Interesting. Thanks. Might be genuine logistical reason why pillar 1 data more readily available than pillar 2?
The news regarding the masks being not fit for purpose despite NHSE reassurance that they were is new (just published on pulse today)That's old news, reports of that was happening some weeks into the lockdown.
Anybody who works in covid specific wards that are likely to have aerosol generation procedures need an FFP3 masks for which fit testing is mandatory (e.g. staff working shifts in ITU, resus, respiratory ward)Just seeing the posts regarding PPE.
Can anyone who works in the NHS tell me, do Nurse, Doctors and other staff get face fitted for their specific masks?
Cheers, have wondered.Anybody who works in covid specific wards that are likely to have aerosol generation procedures need an FFP3 masks for which fit testing is mandatory (e.g. staff working shifts in ITU, resus, respiratory ward)
Fit testing are pretty often failed or for example if staff have beards for religious reasons but for the former those people usually get testing with an alternative respiratory mask model otherwise they need a hood
Not to mention that people might well legitimately have more than one test.Pillar 1 has accuracy which is why they're reporting it. Pillar 2 (drive through and home tests mainly) is double counting people being tested in some cases, both tests carried out and a positive being identified. We also had the fiasco of the government counting a test as something that was in the postal system as well. It suggests that they have no clue of a number in terms of number of people being carried out hence why they're not reporting the data.
They last had Pillar 2 data on the 22nd of May, logistical reasons would be maybe a week or so to fix, the fact it's going on this long suggests a cover up of data by the government. Unfortunately at a local level, pillar 2 data is critical to manage infection rates for those not requiring hospital treatment.
AgreedAmerica has just bought all the world’s supplies of remdisivir. The rest of the world will have to wait at least another three months before they can order any.
Not too fussed (as I’m not impressed by the data) but suspect this is a taste of things to come if/when an effective vaccine gets developed. International relations could get very nasty.
From what I've read of the drug its not convincing enough to justify America's action, I can't help but feel its a knee jerk in response of polls and rising cases there.America has just bought all the world’s supplies of remdisivir. The rest of the world will have to wait at least another three months before they can order any.
Not too fussed (as I’m not impressed by the data) but suspect this is a taste of things to come if/when an effective vaccine gets developed. International relations could get very nasty.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
To be fair we might need it more than anyone else other than Latin America at this rate, and Donald might share with his brother from another mother in Brazil.America has just bought all the world’s supplies of remdisivir. The rest of the world will have to wait at least another three months before they can order any.
Not too fussed (as I’m not impressed by the data) but suspect this is a taste of things to come if/when an effective vaccine gets developed. International relations could get very nasty.
Not sure how that is news, the inevitability of local clusters/lockdowns isn't being contested by even the most optimistic experts, anyone with even basic knowledge of this pandemic knew it was coming at some point.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I live in Hammersmith.
Oddly enough I felt a little ill earlier and brushed it off.
I wish this attitude was adopted for Liverpool’s title win.Not sure how that is news, the inevitability of local clusters/lockdowns isn't being contested by even the most optimistic experts, anyone with even basic knowledge of this pandemic knew it was coming at some point.
If everyone in England had this “basic knowledge” you refer to then the country would be in better shape than it is right now. Making this a front page headline is important as there are clearly a lot of people out there who are either completely ignorant or in denial about the threat of this virus.Not sure how that is news, the inevitability of local clusters/lockdowns isn't being contested by even the most optimistic experts, anyone with even basic knowledge of this pandemic knew it was coming at some point.
Most of the drugs are not actually manufactured in the US (or at least their ingredients are not) and the method is not a secret. I suspect what will happen is countries that do manufacture will block their export, and others will force their own manufacturers to make them regardless of whether they have a licence or not.America has just bought all the world’s supplies of remdisivir. The rest of the world will have to wait at least another three months before they can order any.
Not too fussed (as I’m not impressed by the data) but suspect this is a taste of things to come if/when an effective vaccine gets developed. International relations could get very nasty.
With chloroquine? Yup. There was a lot of horse trading going on, early in the pandemic, to try and keep the normal supply chains going. That’s the sort of thing I’m getting at. Can you imagine how frustrating it will be if an effective vaccine is available and your country has to wait 6 months or more for the first supplies to arrive?Most of the drugs are not actually manufactured in the US (or at least their ingredients are not) and the method is not a secret. I suspect what will happen is countries that do manufacture will block their export, and others will force their own manufacturers to make them regardless of whether they have a licence or not.
We already saw a little bit of that with India.
They're rolling out training to all staff in the NHS now on mask fitting, my other half has her's today.Just seeing the posts regarding PPE.
Can anyone who works in the NHS tell me, do Nurse, Doctors and other staff get face fitted for their specific masks?
Don't see how it's not news. Just because people knew it was coming doesn't mean it shouldn't be reported.Not sure how that is news, the inevitability of local clusters/lockdowns isn't being contested by even the most optimistic experts, anyone with even basic knowledge of this pandemic knew it was coming at some point.
How can they still not know how many people they have tested?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yes, good old blighty. We are so honest, unlike those other countries. Our deaths are probably the lowest, if everyone else could count like us and launch apps like us.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-53222182
It's too soon to compare/only the UK knows how to count.
My company is carrying out Antigen testing for NHS and local GP surgery staff. As far as I can see this is just a screening for their facilities' workforce, knowing the staff are clear. We don't have to report the results or test numbers to anyone other than the facilities we are testing for. I'm not sure if they are then reporting upwards though.How can they still not know how many people they have tested?
That is a vital part of the globally accepted method of managing the virus.
Cheers. Good work. It is vital that medical staff are tested.My company is carrying out Antigen testing for NHS and local GP surgery staff. As far as I can see this is just a screening for their facilities' workforce, knowing the staff are clear. We don't have to report the results or test numbers to anyone other than the facilities we are testing for. I'm not sure if they are then reporting upwards though.
When we offered to do it, it was because we have a PCR machine in one of our labs. We usually use this for plant screening but the tech is exactly the same, you can screen for anything as long as you have the standards available.Cheers. Good work. It is vital that medical staff are tested.
The lack of coordination from the top really concerns me. We really should know how many people have been tested each day. It was a specific government target from a couple of months ago but once the target was missed for a few weeks they stopped sharing the figures.
Even the continuation of lockdown is Leicester is being reported by the Leicester mayor as being communicated in a 1am email without consultation and without clear reasoning.
Coordinated and efficient management if outbreaks and high testing is part of the global strategy.
This pandemic has surely brought home how disjointed and devoid of leadership the whole system isWhen we offered to do it, it was because we have a PCR machine in one of our labs. We usually use this for plant screening but the tech is exactly the same, you can screen for anything as long as you have the standards available.
We saw the appeal for PCR operators and when we applied we expected loads of help and advice but it was all pretty unhelpful and we even have had to find our own test subjects and swab sources. It's been pretty tricky, we expected much more guidance.
Seems to be a common theme, sadly. Disjointed leadership.When we offered to do it, it was because we have a PCR machine in one of our labs. We usually use this for plant screening but the tech is exactly the same, you can screen for anything as long as you have the standards available.
We saw the appeal for PCR operators and when we applied we expected loads of help and advice but it was all pretty unhelpful and we even have had to find our own test subjects and swab sources. It's been pretty tricky, we expected much more guidance.
Just been hearing from a number of people in my area that oldham is one of the ones likely to be locked down.Sky saying that there might be more local lockdowns in the coming days?
If so, better to do it before the mess that is going to greet us on Saturday.