Pogue Mahone
Swiftie Fan Club President
Yeah, that seems a decent explanation. What I find strange though is the fact that we seem to have ramped up our testing enormously, have been seeing relatively few positives and yet our deaths - cases ratio remains so lopsided.
Eg:
In the same period as above our testing grew from 15k to 197k a day, the positivity rate fell from 35% to 0.63% and the absolute number of identified cases dropped by more than 75%. I would have thought that the combination of such a low positivity rate with such widespread testing would lead to us capturing more and more cases that were less and less urgent. But if widespread testing were capturing fewer cases of which a greater share were less urgent then surely its impact on the deaths-cases ratio would be greater than that which we're seeing?
- 7 day Average Cases (April 14th): 4984 | 7 day Average Deaths (April 30th): 712
- That equates to deaths in 14.3% of associated cases
- 7 day Average Cases (June 11th): 1259 | 7 day Average Deaths (June 27th): 133
- That equates to deaths in 10.6% of associated cases (a 26% fall)
Hmmm. That is puzzling. Early on I put your high death rate down to severity bias. But that shouldn’t still be an issue by now, as you say.