I generally don't really care about Scotland or international football so tonight's game didn't bother me. Croatia were by far the better team and deserved their win. Scotland deserved to go out. Hire negative dinosaur managers, get shit results. First game at home to Czechia was the one. The most winnable tie in the group and he bottles it, plays one of the biggest diddies I've ever seen up front on his own while guys like Adams and Gilmour are on the bench. Makes no sense. But that's Steve Clarke.
Oh, and turning to Ryan Fraser instead of James Forrest when you need a goal? Good one Steve. Forrest will likely break the 100 career goal mark in the coming season. Fraser has 30.
There was a stat towards the end of the season that showed only Tadic and someone in Belgium had created more chances than David Turnbull in European football last season. And Turnbull only started playing in December... Clarke didn't even use him once.
Defensive? Yes. Boring at times? Yes.
But disciplined? Composed? Confident? Absolutely fecking lutely! Unless you've seen Scotland play over the last twenty odd years it's difficult to explain. But there always used be an aura of "when are we going to feck this up?" That's why I think a lot of people have misunderstood the over the top celebrations after the England draw. It wasn't about the single point against England; it was because we didn't embarrass ourselves. We held our own against a very strong side, even if they were having an off day. And unlike previous years it didn't seem like a happy accident. It seemed like the least we deserved. There was no "we got away with that!" attitude. For the first time in years it felt like "we should've taken them!" For a nation that's been embarrassingly woeful, that's a massive ideological shift.
There's a genuine enthusiasm right now in Scotland about the future of our national side. And it's not clouded by that doubting feeling that it's going to be the same old same old and we'll somehow feck it up. I still think back to old games against Italy or France where we could score a point up until 80 minutes and, almost like a match being struck, every player would panic in the last ten minutes. Because, as in their heads and in ours and our opponents', we were expected to feck it up. When Hutton was smashed in the Scotland penalty box in 2007 and it somehow resulted in a penalty to Italy (still don't understand that decision) the country wide post match commentary was basically a shrug of the shoulders and a "yes it was a shocking decision, but we would've lost anyway".
It might be difficult to understand for English supporters or any other supporters who expect the pinnacle of achievements from their side (which is understandable because, seriously, fecking look at the quality they have). But ours is lower-key, more humble; we just want to see our team play with pride and confidence. Scotland did that in this tournament as it went on. The score cards at the end of the game, and within the confines of the statistics that will remain in years to come for those that browse them online, will say we lost two games and drew one 0-0. But for those who watched it, we'll know that - for the majority of it - we played liked we belonged in a major competition.
I hope it's the jumping point for progression. Players like McTominay, McGinn and especially Gilmour give us hope that we can no longer be that team that people see as an easy three points. Maybe we'll even be seen as a respectable underdog? That'll suit us fine.