Serie A 90's draft

Oaencha

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2014
Messages
2,237
Hm but a player could be not at his peak but still better than some mediocre clogger for the oppo, surely?
Yeah absolutely and that will be one of the positives of the match day threads. There are a few picks that will split opinions.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,336
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
Yeah absolutely and that will be one of the positives of the match day threads. There are a few picks that will split opinions.
That's one of the good things. As @BeforeKeanetherewasRobson says, you generate a new discussion - partly because it's a lot of new players, but also because we are looking at a lot of the usual stars but some of whom perhaps played their best football elsewhere or earlier/later in their career.
 

sincher

"I will cry if Rooney leaves"
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
25,589
Location
YSC
I get the criteria. Makes sense.

Impressed by your passion also chaps.
 

sincher

"I will cry if Rooney leaves"
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
25,589
Location
YSC
Forget your 40-game peak, we had a 4-game peak in place for that Prem draft.
Jeez a 4 game peak. I mean Mickey Evans once won player of the month in the PL.

Who is Mickey Evans you ask?

EXACCHHHLY.
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,015
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
  • EAP - 1. M. van Basten 2. R. Donadoni 3. M. Tassotti 4. D. Stankovic 5. G. Pessotto 6. T. Brolin 7. M. Ambrosini 8. G. Pancaro 9. G. Signorini

  • Onenil - 1. R. Baggio 2. A. Costacurta 3. D. Baggio 4. L. Minotti 5. Careca 6. J. Chamot 7. R. Mussi 8. F. Asprilla 9. G. Marocchi
  • harms 1. Ronaldo 2. C. Ferrara 3. P. Montero 4. Y. Djorkaeff 5. C. Seedorf 6. A. Carboni 7. D. Fuser 8. W. Jonk 9. C. Taffarel
  • Moby/Pat Mustard 1. G. Batistuta 2. F. Cannavaro 3. R. Mancini 4. M. Almeyda 5. E. Chiesa 6. Júlio César 7. D. Platt 8. L. Marchegiani 9. A. Di Chiara
  • MJJ/Sjor 1. A. Del Piero 2. J. Veron 3. Aldair 4. A. Conte 5. S. Katanec 6. L. Di Biagio 7. T. Helveg 8. F. Toldo 9. D. Fonseca
  • 2mufc0/Invictus 1. Z. Zidane 2. P. Vierchowod 3. Z. Boban 4. O. Bierhoff 5. J. Angloma 6. R. Jarni 7. F. Ravanelli 8. I. Tudor 9. C. Karembeu
  • Lord Sinister 1. P. Maldini 2. G. Signori 3. A. Winter 4. V. Montella 5. M. Torricelli 6. Leonardo 7. M. Carrera 8. R. Di Matteo
  • Gio/Theon 1. F. Baresi 2. G. Weah 3. D. Deschamps 4. P. Sousa 5. R. Sosa 6. G. Giannini 7. L. De Agostini 8. W. Zenga
  • Enigma/The Red Viper 1. L. Matthäus 2. G. Bergomi 3. G. Vialli 4. R. Ferri 5. Dunga 6. Branco 7. A. Balbo 8. A. Lombardo
  • idmanager 1. F. Rijkaard 2. E. Davids 3. H. Crespo 4. A. Di Livio 5. R. Ayala 6. M. Salas 7. G. Favalli 8. A. Recoba
  • antohan 1. M. Rui Costa 2. J. Kohler 3. A. Benarrivo 4. S. Mihajlovic 5. R. Sensini 6. C. Caniggia 7. Alemão 8. A. Peruzzi
  • prath92/Crappy 1. P. Nedved 2. C. Vieri 3. D. Albertini 4. D. Savicevic 5. M. Iuliano 6. P. Ince 7. A. Fortunato 8. P. Negro
  • Tuppet 1. R. Gullit 2. A. Brehme 3. L. Blanc 4. T. Hassler 5. R. Voller 6. N. Berti 7. D. Petrescu 8. E. Scifo
  • Cal? 1. M. Desailly 2. F. Totti 3. J. Klinsmann 4. C. Panucci 5. G Zambrotta 6. A Pirlo 7. G Lentini 8. G. Gattuso
  • Oaencha 1. A. Nesta 2. J. Zanetti 3. G. Zola 4. F. Inzaghi 5. V. Candela 6. A. Tacchinardi 7. G. Pagliuca 8. H. Nakata
  • Raees 1. Cafu 2. L. Thuram 3. D. Simeone 4. V. Jugovic 5. F. Couto 6. A. Möller 7. G. Buffon 8. E. Francescoli
@Lord SInister
 

Lord SInister

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2015
Messages
2,967
Location
where grasses are green and girls are pretty


  • EAP - 1. M. van Basten 2. R. Donadoni 3. M. Tassotti 4. D. Stankovic 5. G. Pessotto 6. T. Brolin 7. M. Ambrosini 8. G. Pancaro 9. G. Signorini

  • Onenil - 1. R. Baggio 2. A. Costacurta 3. D. Baggio 4. L. Minotti 5. Careca 6. J. Chamot 7. R. Mussi 8. F. Asprilla 9. G. Marocchi
  • harms 1. Ronaldo 2. C. Ferrara 3. P. Montero 4. Y. Djorkaeff 5. C. Seedorf 6. A. Carboni 7. D. Fuser 8. W. Jonk 9. C. Taffarel
  • Moby/Pat Mustard 1. G. Batistuta 2. F. Cannavaro 3. R. Mancini 4. M. Almeyda 5. E. Chiesa 6. Júlio César 7. D. Platt 8. L. Marchegiani 9. A. Di Chiara
  • MJJ/Sjor 1. A. Del Piero 2. J. Veron 3. Aldair 4. A. Conte 5. S. Katanec 6. L. Di Biagio 7. T. Helveg 8. F. Toldo 9. D. Fonseca
  • 2mufc0/Invictus 1. Z. Zidane 2. P. Vierchowod 3. Z. Boban 4. O. Bierhoff 5. J. Angloma 6. R. Jarni 7. F. Ravanelli 8. I. Tudor 9. C. Karembeu
  • Lord Sinister 1. P. Maldini 2. G. Signori 3. A. Winter 4. V. Montella 5. M. Torricelli 6. Leonardo 7. M. Carrera 8. R. Di Matteo 9. M. Ielpo
  • Gio/Theon 1. F. Baresi 2. G. Weah 3. D. Deschamps 4. P. Sousa 5. R. Sosa 6. G. Giannini 7. L. De Agostini 8. W. Zenga
  • Enigma/The Red Viper 1. L. Matthäus 2. G. Bergomi 3. G. Vialli 4. R. Ferri 5. Dunga 6. Branco 7. A. Balbo 8. A. Lombardo
  • idmanager 1. F. Rijkaard 2. E. Davids 3. H. Crespo 4. A. Di Livio 5. R. Ayala 6. M. Salas 7. G. Favalli 8. A. Recoba
  • antohan 1. M. Rui Costa 2. J. Kohler 3. A. Benarrivo 4. S. Mihajlovic 5. R. Sensini 6. C. Caniggia 7. Alemão 8. A. Peruzzi
  • prath92/Crappy 1. P. Nedved 2. C. Vieri 3. D. Albertini 4. D. Savicevic 5. M. Iuliano 6. P. Ince 7. A. Fortunato 8. P. Negro
  • Tuppet 1. R. Gullit 2. A. Brehme 3. L. Blanc 4. T. Hassler 5. R. Voller 6. N. Berti 7. D. Petrescu 8. E. Scifo
  • Cal? 1. M. Desailly 2. F. Totti 3. J. Klinsmann 4. C. Panucci 5. G Zambrotta 6. A Pirlo 7. G Lentini 8. G. Gattuso
  • Oaencha 1. A. Nesta 2. J. Zanetti 3. G. Zola 4. F. Inzaghi 5. V. Candela 6. A. Tacchinardi 7. G. Pagliuca 8. H. Nakata
  • Raees 1. Cafu 2. L. Thuram 3. D. Simeone 4. V. Jugovic 5. F. Couto 6. A. Möller 7. G. Buffon 8. E. Francescoli

@Gio
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
Are GKs being used to decide draws now? I don’t think it’s fair to add that rule now. Many of us (including us) would have probably picked a keeper earlier had we known that GKs would be important enough to affect results
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
Are GKs being used to decide draws now? I don’t think it’s fair to add that rule now. Many of us (including us) would have probably picked a keeper earlier had we known that GKs would be important enough to affect results
Agree - it's not in the OP.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
I opened the discussion on some of the previous pages. Think @2mufc0 has confirmed that he's sticking with it.
Nah, don't like the geezer and my plans are rather different.
You don't rate him or looking for something different as a type?

Thought he was really good at Napoli up top. Then injuries took their toll but still he was very good when on.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,177
Location
Montevideo
Are GKs being used to decide draws now? I don’t think it’s fair to add that rule now. Many of us (including us) would have probably picked a keeper earlier had we known that GKs would be important enough to affect results
We discussed this yesterday and @2mufc0 confirmed it.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,177
Location
Montevideo
You don't rate him or looking for something different as a type?

Thought he was really good at Napoli up top. Then injuries took their toll but still he was very good when on.
Bit of both. Mostly that I'm looking for a different type.

I can't say I don't rate him, I'm just indifferent to him, primarily due to not liking him and his post-football activities as an agent. It's irrelevant to how he performs on the pitch for MJJ/Sjor but very relevant to whether I want him in MY team.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,177
Location
Montevideo
Are GKs being used to decide draws now? I don’t think it’s fair to add that rule now. Many of us (including us) would have probably picked a keeper earlier had we known that GKs would be important enough to affect results
BTW, this notion that keepers are irrelevant and don't affect results has turned absolutely ridiculous.

The fact you are exclusively worrying about their relevance in the event that 20-30 people voting on a poll produce a draw is mindboggling. That is exactly why it was introduced and been in place in every draft since: people not factoring in keepers has gone too far.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
I think it's a bit strange to introduce that rule when 3 goalkeepers were already picked, but whatever.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,177
Location
Montevideo
I think it's a bit strange to introduce that rule when 3 goalkeepers were already picked, but whatever.
It's not really that it was introduced out of nowhere. It was in place at least in the last couple of drafts and, by all accounts, worked well. I gave it for granted and I'm sure I'm not the only one.

This is what I said when I picked Peruzzi, which prompted @Enigma_87 asking about it:

I don't know who is in the GK committee and wondered what their take would be given many things pointing towards Peruzzi (we've had that debate before and got nowhere).

FWIW @idmanager, I would have picked Pagliuca as well, so if we play each other and draw, you win.
 
FOA of all managers

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,015
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
I think some fair points have been made, and it's my fault for not laying out the rules in the case of a draw at the start. Ideally i should have put in the average time pick like we did in the previous draft.

I'll leave it to the rest of the drafters to decide, if you think we should scrap the GK rule and choose between deciding draws by:

1) Penalties

2) I find a neutral who didn't vote in the game to decide it

3) Coin toss

Or continue with the GK rule.
 
Last edited:

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
BTW, this notion that keepers are irrelevant and don't affect results has turned absolutely ridiculous.

The fact you are exclusively worrying about their relevance in the event that 20-30 people voting on a poll produce a draw is mindboggling. That is exactly why it was introduced and been in place in every draft since: people not factoring in keepers has gone too far.
It’s useful in an All time Draft where there are easily 10 goalkeeepers at the least who could be GOAT or thereabouts but it doesn’t make sense to use it in such a limited pool. Especially introducing it in the middle of the draft because had we known it earlier it would have made a difference to the way we draft.

Obviously Goalkeepers are important but unless specified earlier it seems a bit unfair to say that if your keeper isn’t as good as the other team’s then you could lose in the event of a tie. Essentially you are starting with a 1-0 deficit if you are up against someone like Pagliuca or Buffon.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,029
Location
Moscow
I think that a simple coin-toss could be implemented, if everyone is tired of penalties (I'm not)
 

crappycraperson

"Resident cricket authority"
Scout
Joined
Dec 26, 2003
Messages
38,187
Location
Interweb
I think some fair points have been made, and it's my fault for not laying out the rules in the case of a draw at the start. Ideally i should have put in the average time pick like we did in the previous draft.

I'll leave to the rest of the drafters to decide, if you think we should scrap the GK rule and choose between deciding draws by:

1) Penalties

2) I find a neutral who didn't vote in the game to decide it

Or continue with the GK rule.
I think harms and prath have a fair point but IMO we should continue with GK rule. There is no other way to make GKs relevant in a draft. Only problem is that ranking of keepers in same ball park in this draft will get very contentious if it comes into play for some draw.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
I have no problem either way. The issue is always introducing a rule midway through the draft as it affects people's choices in the round itself. For example 8 keepers have been picked since the last 16 picks or so. It definitely had a play in the picking process and it sucks to be in either end of the snake when that happens and you realize you'd most likely start the first game with 1-0 deficit.

Tie breaker rules should always be clear from the off if they are relevant to the picking process. For example swapping penalties with coin toss doesn't really matter, but picking time and picking keeper does.

I don't think we ever transferred tie breaker rules from successive drafts as a rule, neither the keeper being the tie breaker was a regular thing - think it was only used in the last draft.

It's up to @2mufc0 of course to decide whatever is best.
 

Tuppet

New Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2014
Messages
3,622
Location
West Coast
My 2 cents on keeper business (not just this draft) is that I don't like trying to artificially make any position important. We all have been doing draft for quite long now and everyone has a decent understanding of the game, if everyone collectively doesn't rate / vote for keepers then may be they are not that important. Either way let the voters decide.
 

Theon

Lord of the Iron Islands
Joined
Oct 14, 2011
Messages
13,289


  • EAP - 1. M. van Basten 2. R. Donadoni 3. M. Tassotti 4. D. Stankovic 5. G. Pessotto 6. T. Brolin 7. M. Ambrosini 8. G. Pancaro 9. G. Signorini

  • Onenil - 1. R. Baggio 2. A. Costacurta 3. D. Baggio 4. L. Minotti 5. Careca 6. J. Chamot 7. R. Mussi 8. F. Asprilla 9. G. Marocchi
  • harms 1. Ronaldo 2. C. Ferrara 3. P. Montero 4. Y. Djorkaeff 5. C. Seedorf 6. A. Carboni 7. D. Fuser 8. W. Jonk 9. C. Taffarel
  • Moby/Pat Mustard 1. G. Batistuta 2. F. Cannavaro 3. R. Mancini 4. M. Almeyda 5. E. Chiesa 6. Júlio César 7. D. Platt 8. L. Marchegiani 9. A. Di Chiara
  • MJJ/Sjor 1. A. Del Piero 2. J. Veron 3. Aldair 4. A. Conte 5. S. Katanec 6. L. Di Biagio 7. T. Helveg 8. F. Toldo 9. D. Fonseca
  • 2mufc0/Invictus 1. Z. Zidane 2. P. Vierchowod 3. Z. Boban 4. O. Bierhoff 5. J. Angloma 6. R. Jarni 7. F. Ravanelli 8. I. Tudor 9. C. Karembeu
  • Lord Sinister 1. P. Maldini 2. G. Signori 3. A. Winter 4. V. Montella 5. M. Torricelli 6. Leonardo 7. M. Carrera 8. R. Di Matteo 9. M. Ielpo
  • Gio/Theon 1. F. Baresi 2. G. Weah 3. D. Deschamps 4. P. Sousa 5. R. Sosa 6. G. Giannini 7. L. De Agostini 8. W. Zenga 9. Zé Maria
  • Enigma/The Red Viper 1. L. Matthäus 2. G. Bergomi 3. G. Vialli 4. R. Ferri 5. Dunga 6. Branco 7. A. Balbo 8. A. Lombardo
  • idmanager 1. F. Rijkaard 2. E. Davids 3. H. Crespo 4. A. Di Livio 5. R. Ayala 6. M. Salas 7. G. Favalli 8. A. Recoba
  • antohan 1. M. Rui Costa 2. J. Kohler 3. A. Benarrivo 4. S. Mihajlovic 5. R. Sensini 6. C. Caniggia 7. Alemão 8. A. Peruzzi
  • prath92/Crappy 1. P. Nedved 2. C. Vieri 3. D. Albertini 4. D. Savicevic 5. M. Iuliano 6. P. Ince 7. A. Fortunato 8. P. Negro
  • Tuppet 1. R. Gullit 2. A. Brehme 3. L. Blanc 4. T. Hassler 5. R. Voller 6. N. Berti 7. D. Petrescu 8. E. Scifo
  • Cal? 1. M. Desailly 2. F. Totti 3. J. Klinsmann 4. C. Panucci 5. G Zambrotta 6. A Pirlo 7. G Lentini 8. G. Gattuso
  • Oaencha 1. A. Nesta 2. J. Zanetti 3. G. Zola 4. F. Inzaghi 5. V. Candela 6. A. Tacchinardi 7. G. Pagliuca 8. H. Nakata
  • Raees 1. Cafu 2. L. Thuram 3. D. Simeone 4. V. Jugovic 5. F. Couto 6. A. Möller 7. G. Buffon 8. E. Francescoli
 

idmanager

New Member
Joined
Aug 18, 2010
Messages
2,843
My 2 cents on keeper business (not just this draft) is that I don't like trying to artificially make any position important. We all have been doing draft for quite long now and everyone has a decent understanding of the game, if everyone collectively doesn't rate / vote for keepers then may be they are not that important. Either way let the voters decide.
Agreed. Although I did like the GK thing as well.

And since we don't reward the winners of the last draft with anything, how about he decides who wins the drawn games in the next draft. Super powers and shit.
 

Šjor Bepo

Wout is love, Wout is life; all hail Wout!
Joined
Mar 29, 2011
Messages
15,662
Its sad how we disrespect gk position in drafts, one of the most important positions in football becames only slightly relevant if we use it for draws....

In this case, if we didnt have it from the start then its not fair to implement new rules half way through.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,177
Location
Montevideo
It’s useful in an All time Draft where there are easily 10 goalkeeepers at the least who could be GOAT or thereabouts but it doesn’t make sense to use it in such a limited pool. Especially introducing it in the middle of the draft because had we known it earlier it would have made a difference to the way we draft.

Obviously Goalkeepers are important but unless specified earlier it seems a bit unfair to say that if your keeper isn’t as good as the other team’s then you could lose in the event of a tie. Essentially you are starting with a 1-0 deficit if you are up against someone like Pagliuca or Buffon.
I think the opposite, it is particularly relevant when keeper quality is clearly different and, from what half of you are saying, you don't give two shits about it. If anyone sacrificed an important pick for a decent keeper instead of picking Simon Mignolet at the death in R14 they deserve the advantage (akin to the away goals rule, not a 1-0 deficit) for getting DDG in R7 instead.

It's a good rule which rarely needs to be applied but keeps things more honest and in line with real life.

That said, I'm fine with a coin toss (not the one neutral decides, that got made up on the spot in a final once and the moment the neutral was suggested I knew I had lost).

I probably would have picked Peruzzi anyway.
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,336
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers
My 2 cents on keeper business (not just this draft) is that I don't like trying to artificially make any position important. We all have been doing draft for quite long now and everyone has a decent understanding of the game, if everyone collectively doesn't rate / vote for keepers then may be they are not that important. Either way let the voters decide.
Yeah I think it's shifted, a long way from when you could just stick 'goalie' in and get away with it. That said, we still see the odd clown keeper cause less voting problems than they arguably should, so I'm quite open to using it as a tool that is relevant to the match to separate draws. Prefer it to the pure lottery based resolutions, as least it has some resonance to the drafting process. It's also fairly proportionate given draws are rare and keepers can be underappreciated.

As for the here and now, I'm not fussed. While it would be in our interests to have it, I'm not arsed. One thing I'd say is that the OP didn't specify how draws would be handled so it was always going to be a mid-draft or even mid-game sort-out-job. Generally I prefer the resolution to be connected to the match in some way rather than pure lottery, whether that's keepers or something else entirely.
That said, I'm fine with a coin toss (not the one neutral decides, that got made up on the spot in a final once and the moment the neutral was suggested I knew I had lost).
Was that Brwned suggesting Pete and you were built around players he didn't rate like Cruyff or Moore? Knew you were a dead-man walking.
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,469
I'm in favour of the keeper rule. Why don't we just have a vote on it and another solution that someone else can propose.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,177
Location
Montevideo
Was that Brwned suggesting Pete and you were built around players he didn't rate like Cruyff or Moore? Knew you were a dead-man walking.
That rings a bell, not sure it was me though.

The one I'm referring to is the 50s final against Brwned, who was the mod himself. Not that he "fixed it" as the logic of using a draft manager who hadn't voted was applied before (the weird thing was PMing tactics and OP to your rival for him to start the thread :lol:). There were two though and I knew both would vote either side but my fan hadn't been around for days :(

Polaroid had originally drafted some key players in his gung-ho frontline while my setup was more of a nuanced setup (e.g. DLP Schüster, roaming Boniek and LB Breitner, etc) that needed a lot of explaining and not just someone who hadn't followed or bothered to vote popping in and deciding a final.

That was actually when I came up with LRC penos as an alternative but before it was considered Polaroid posted his measured but entirely predictable views.

That's why I was such an arse in the next draft. I had been shafted some way or another two finals in a row so I was hellbent on winning that one.
 

Pat_Mustard

I'm so gorgeous they want to put me under arrest!
Joined
Jan 17, 2008
Messages
13,807
Location
A never-nude? I thought he just liked cut-offs.
Anything other than fecking penalties to decide a draw is fine by me. My perception was that the 'lowest average pick time' experiment worked well in speeding things up a bit, and I wouldn't mind using that again here.