SAFMUTD
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2018
- Messages
- 11,787
Well I can change it to "who's responsable" or how do you propose I do it so it doesn't feel like an attack?The thread literally has "who's to blame?" in the title. That's not a discussion, it's a blatant attempt to start a negative witch hunt against the management and coaching staff.
We're not good at set pieces because we opted to buy players that aren't strong in the traits required for set pieces. We spent our time on the training ground focusing on improving our play on the pitch, which succeeded because we've managed to win so many points from losing positions.
They way you've worded your op you would think we didn't finished 2nd, we didn't go unbeaten away from home, and we didn't get to a semi final and a final. Beaten by the two winners of those competitions by the way. Not a bad effort to only be beaten by the winners of the competitions.
Say what you want, it's clear you have some sort of agenda against the management and coaching staff.
Also it's not a thing about us not being good at set pieces, we weren't good before, we are terrible now. Bottom of the table terrible, for a team that's on top 4 that surely should ring the alarms.
About all the other stuff I don't see how that is valid. "We spent a lot of time training other things so we don't have time for set pieces" really? Are we going for that?
Also if you read the OP I only talk about set pieces which is what the thread is about, we could have won the league, the UCL, and still wouldn't change the fact that we are terrible at set pieces.