Sir Jim Ratcliffe: I want to buy Manchester United | Will make a bid for the club [Telegraph]

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,647
He'll probably give Fletcher another promotion.
From what some respected journalists say, Fletcher is actually quite intelligent and seen to be a good part of the new look of the club.
 

LordSpud

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
2,428
I think if this Jim Ratcliffe solution doesnt happen then the Glazers will never go. They need to face it the club is on its knees and really think about selling up.
 

Boondog

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2022
Messages
699
I think that the Glazers want out because the infrastructure is in shambles and they don't have the money to rebuild it. Also the sponsors are starting to bail out.
Yeah I suspect the sponsors loom large in all this. And when all is said and done Ronaldo demanding to leave may prove to be the final straw. It's hard to imagine that they have the cash to solve sponsor unhappiness of not having a superstar. They can't solve that one by firing the coach.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,521
Location
Ireland
From what some respected journalists say, Fletcher is actually quite intelligent and seen to be a good part of the new look of the club.
Well if true, his intelligence is having next to zero impact on our performance on the pitch. He's been here a while now.
 

MonkeysMagic

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2015
Messages
1,916
Location
Euclidean space
When the dust settles on this latest 'will they/won't they' sale talk, we will all realise that the minority stake sale was just an exercise for the Glazers to extract more cash out of the club without servicing the debt or investment in recruitment or infrastructure. Sadly these leeches are here to stay for a few more years!
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,647
Well if true, his intelligence is having next to zero impact on our performance on the pitch. He's been here a while now.
Yeah, but I wonder if thats because of the volatility of Ole to Rangnick moreso than Fletcher struggling. It's too opaque to know whats going on really, but the perceived impact of Fletcher isn't believed to be incompetent by the good journos at least.
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,452
I’d be very surprised if this came to a head so soon. It makes much more sense, as others have said, to get cash though a minority sale and then play this thing out a little longer. Their dream is for the Super League to get off the ground and suddenly it’s a different world.
 

Gordon Godot

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Messages
1,374
A minority stake to private equity doesnt address teh fundamental problem. The process has started and now we need to ramp up the process to get them out.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,110
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
Well if true, his intelligence is having next to zero impact on our performance on the pitch. He's been here a while now.
Considering he doesn’t pick the team, he doesn’t pick who we we sign, he doesn’t decide how we play, he doesn’t decide how much we spend and he doesn’t hire the sporting director I’m not entirely sure why that’s on him.
 

LordSpud

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
2,428
As far as I know that’s correct.
Instead of the 75m per year they pay us they will only pay 50m. Not sure if that stacks up even more the following year but its for sure a slippery slope because I just cant see us getting CL for the next few years.
 

iato89

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 18, 2020
Messages
135
When the dust settles on this latest 'will they/won't they' sale talk, we will all realise that the minority stake sale was just an exercise for the Glazers to extract more cash out of the club without servicing the debt or investment in recruitment or infrastructure. Sadly these leeches are here to stay for a few more years!
the less stake they have the better, if they sell that minority stake to someone like Ratcliff it will be for a future long term sale, if the sale goes to an investment fund then it might be...
 

Counterfactual

Full Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2019
Messages
3,311
Location
Mobil Avenue station
When the dust settles on this latest 'will they/won't they' sale talk, we will all realise that the minority stake sale was just an exercise for the Glazers to extract more cash out of the club without servicing the debt or investment in recruitment or infrastructure. Sadly these leeches are here to stay for a few more years!
How long would you hold on to an asset which had massively appreciated, but now appeared to be on the decline? Bear in mind it's an asset which you have mis-managed and have no idea how to revive.
 

Woodzy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2004
Messages
14,762
Location
Cardiff
So, obviously Musk wasn't actually interested but could the reason behind his tweet in the first place be because he knew the club is for sale?
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,637
Location
Sydney
I’d be very surprised if this came to a head so soon. It makes much more sense, as others have said, to get cash though a minority sale and then play this thing out a little longer. Their dream is for the Super League to get off the ground and suddenly it’s a different world.
it only helps them play it out longer if they put the cash from the equity sale back into the club.. the club needs investment which is why their strategy is going belly up

you honestly see that happening? How much? 100m, 200m, 300m?

also, what private equity firm is giving these clowns more cash to run this business for longer?

it actually makes no sense really, when you think about it
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
So, obviously Musk wasn't actually interested but could the reason behind his tweet in the first place be because he knew the club is for sale?
He tweeted after that he was just making a commonly made Twitter joke. The same as McGregor about a year ago.
 

Green Arrow

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
384
Location
Formally of Chorlton
Instead of the 75m per year they pay us they will only pay 50m. Not sure if that stacks up even more the following year but its for sure a slippery slope because I just cant see us getting CL for the next few years.
Agreed with the squad needing complete overhaul it’s not happening for a few years especially if the Glazers are still here with that Apollo group.
 

GreatDane

Full Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
1,607
So, obviously Musk wasn't actually interested but could the reason behind his tweet in the first place be because he knew the club is for sale?
Very likely, or he might have been hit up for a small investment in the 0,001%'ers groupchat.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Timing would still suggest he knew something. I'd expect he was among the potential investors approached over the minority stake
Or just that he saw that we were trending after the Brentford game with loads of stuff about fans wanting new owners.
 

thegregster

Harbinger of new information
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
13,567
Instead of the 75m per year they pay us they will only pay 50m. Not sure if that stacks up even more the following year but its for sure a slippery slope because I just cant see us getting CL for the next few years.
The addias deal is up in 2024 anyway. So it's only 1 season.
 

redshaw

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2015
Messages
9,709
I can see the club increasing in value along with others but it's also a good time to cash in. It's been a very good earner and investment by their dad for them, earned hundreds of millions and just sitting on the asset has quadrupled in value. The big money obviously is cashing in and what they plan to do with it and their younger families. They could wait until it's worth 6 billion but I think they realize they can't elevate the club and any extra value will be the game itself expanding more.

For us fans the galling aspect is we've had the money to fund multiple stadiums outright or be easily paid off by now while being competitive on the field with less money spent had they hired people capable of running a football club or never bought it. Instead we have a decaying stadium/facilities, a billion of the clubs money spent on the team completely mismanaged, hundreds of millions lost in CL money and a billion lost on the interest to banks so they could have the privilege of sitting on a valuable asset that would now be illegal. Absolutely scandalous how much has been lost and how the club has been set back. We might never return with the oil clubs and capital cities coming up. We've spent a decade just being caught up and overtaken.
 

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Is this guy actually loaded? Like money enough to have us spending like a rich club?
 

Brophs

The One and Only
Joined
Nov 28, 2006
Messages
50,452
it only helps them play it out longer if they put the cash from the equity sale back into the club.. the club needs investment which is why their strategy is going belly up

you honestly see that happening? How much? 100m, 200m, 300m?

also, what private equity firm is giving these clowns more cash to run this business for longer?

it actually makes no sense really, when you think about it
I think you may be misreading what their strategy is. At this moment in time, I think we’re seeing it. Executed badly, obviously, but nonetheless. It doesn’t factor in huge capital input or investment, however they come by it.

As to number, at a speculated value of £5bn, I’d expect a minority sale of somewhere between 10-15%.

In terms of which firm will give it, I’m not sure who’s in that market right now. Quite a few would have a good look, though. In football finance there’s a view, rightly or wrongly, which has been borne out by Boehly’s deal, that football clubs have a massive amount of growth still left in them.
 

phelans shorts

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
27,217
Location
Gaz. Is a Mewling Quim.
Yeah, but I wonder if thats because of the volatility of Ole to Rangnick moreso than Fletcher struggling. It's too opaque to know whats going on really, but the perceived impact of Fletcher isn't believed to be incompetent by the good journos at least.
But what do they know compared to devilish
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,682
Location
Chesterfield
A lot of noise, which I refuse to believe out of sheer pessimism.. But it's a good time for the Glazers to sell. Our value and stock is going down and the only way that'll go up is if they start spending. So if they don't want to spend, then they have to sell
 

Zippycup

New Member
Joined
May 24, 2022
Messages
1,041
This shouldn't even make the top 100 reasons the ownership needs to change
You're wrong.
The words football club were taken out of the badge in 1998 to make the name more commercially viable.
To have thise words back in place would suggest that we are reverting back to old.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
You're wrong.
The words football club were taken out of the badge in 1998 to make the name more commercially viable.
To have thise words back in place would suggest that we are reverting back to old.
How did the words FC help us in the 70s and 80s?
 

littlepeasoup

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2013
Messages
5,344
Location
Give peas a chance.
I doubt very much he'll come in and start spunking money left and right. I suppose the hope is he is better able to channel the revenues the club generates without the paying of dividends and interest on loan repayments.

We are absolutely desperate for investment into infrastructure - Old Trafford, the training ground, so perhaps he'd channel some of his own money into those type of projects.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,426
You're wrong.
The words football club were taken out of the badge in 1998 to make the name more commercially viable.
To have thise words back in place would suggest that we are reverting back to old.
The Glazers could put them back on there tomorrow and it wouldn't make a difference.

Yeah sure it'd be nice to have it back on there but it's fairly meaningless in the grand scheme of things.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Is this guy actually loaded? Like money enough to have us spending like a rich club?
He is but it is doubtful he would put a load of his own money in.

All he needs to do is clear the debt as part of the sale and not take dividends and we could compete with anyone financially. I think the major hope is that he would give a shit enough to put the right people in place and demand results. That in addition with not having another billion spent on debt repayments would stand us in good stead.
 

OverratedOpinion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2017
Messages
6,512
Or as much as the Glazers - it has to be somewhat profitable to him I guess
Why? Buying a football club is like buying a super yacht, Man Utd are a great status symbol to own because once you've brought us we are entirely self sustainable and will probably only go up in value.