The structural problems are obvious but not all our managers failed in the same way.
Under Ole at this point (January in his second full season) we were sitting at the top of the Premier League, not 3 points away from 11th like now. We ended up 2nd, losing the EL final on penalties and scoring 125 goals that season, the most in 15 years. That was after being 3rd the previous year. Mourinho was 2nd too in his second season after winning not one, but two trophies in the previous one.
This season (ETH's second) we were 4th in a soft CL group conceding 15 goals in 6 games. Close to the 22 goals we've scored in the league... in 20 games. 8th at the moment, negative goal difference, 3 points away from the bottom half of the table. And out of the league cup at home in the second round, with Eddie Howe using that game as a training session.
There's an obvious difference with two managers who brought stability and kept us relatively solid and competitive for some time, unbeaten for long periods at times, capable of winning games away from home. And then you have ETH getting results for 6-7 months and being a mess from that point onwards, both results and performances wise.
One thing is failing as a manager because you're 2nd but didn't fight for the league, and after some time you lost the dressing room and got the sack. A natural 2-3 years cycle in football. But one can wonder if a better structure and cohesion in recruitment could have meant adding X points more to the table, allowing you to aim for something more at the peak of your tenure. I think the answer is no both for Jose and Ole, but it's a valid question.
And another thing is smelling like rotten fish for 10 consecutive months as we've been now, starting from the first season around March (before the injuries started) and not seeing the light at the end of the tunnel during that time. All this with the players trying and well behind the manager, by the way. That's sheer incompetence and there's no board or lack of structure to hide behind.
Ineos can plan in any way they want, but football has its own logic and at some point it becomes untenable. There's no manager who can resist losing games and getting ridiculed on a regular basis for months, no matter if there's a takeover or not. I can understand that they would want to focus on other areas, finish the season without changes and bring their man in the summer. But that will be the case if circumstances allow it. I'd suggest you all not betting a penny on ETH finishing the season with us. That's my friendly advice.