Smalling / SIGNED for Roma

Status
Not open for further replies.

Focusmate

Full Member
Joined
Oct 11, 2018
Messages
364
Supports
Non League
Well he wasn't our permanent manager so I doubt he had much say in that - and it was a 4 + 1 deal - but yes, we should have not given him that contract.

I still find it strange that not one club is interested in signing Jones. He is not good enough for us - but he is a hell of a lot better than anything WBA and Fulham have
Phil Jones new contract is for 120k a week basic I think - literally noone else is going to pay him anything like that much.
Only way he moves on is a subsidised loan like with Sanchez. With our “deadwood” it should be about getting wages off the book not holding out for transfer fees
 

Wheato

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2013
Messages
1,530
Location
Manchester
The modern day defender needs to be able to play out from the back or bring the ball forward when the opposition put everyone behind the ball. Smalling hates having the ball he always wants to get rid of it as soon as possible. He can defend and keep up with pacey strikers, and he's pretty decent in the air, but we need a Rio Ferdinand to support Maguire.
 

MikeKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
5,125
Supports
Bournemouth
Exactly I agree as I was one of the very few saying we were crazy letting him go on loan while at the time keeping Jones and Rojo .
It was no need for it really. When we bought Maguire for such a huge fee I thought it was to partner him up with Smalling. Like the club finally said say feck it, lets just go with it and see where we are with a balanced experienced partnership. Instead we replaced our best CB for years in Smalling with Lindelof and as a result Maguire didn't get the best terms to thrive coming into the side, considering his flaws.

Favouring Jones and Rojo as backup is insane and to a lesser degree going with Bailly, Lindelof and Tuanzebe ahead of Smalling is also a little crazy. I get that we're building for the future, but to loan Smalling while keeping Jones and Rojo does neither, it just weakens us and doesn't build anything. Now we're seeing Lindelof is not good enough, Bailly is still getting injured, Tuanzebe as well, and Chris probably doesn't want to play for us anymore as he feels unappreciated and hard done by.

It will be another season of sideways improvement at best, looking to follow Mengi and other youth prospects to see if they can fill in instead of Jones etc. Maguire wont magically become quicker, and Lindelof wont magically become a dominant CB or a leader.
 
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
13,122
It was no need for it really. When we bought Maguire for such a huge fee I thought it was to partner him up with Smalling. Like the club finally said say feck it, lets just go with it and see where we are with a balanced experienced partnership. Instead we replaced our best CB for years in Smalling with Lindelof and as a result Maguire didn't get the best terms to thrive coming into the side, considering his flaws.

Favouring Jones and Rojo as backup is insane and to a lesser degree going with Bailly, Lindelof and Tuanzebe ahead of Smalling is also a little crazy. I get that we're building for the future, but to loan Smalling while keeping Jones and Rojo does neither, it just weakens us and doesn't build anything. Now we're seeing Lindelof is not good enough, Bailly is still getting injured, Tuanzebe as well, and Chris probably doesn't want to play for us anymore as he feels unappreciated and hard done by.

It will be another season of sideways improvement at best, looking to follow Mengi and other youth prospects to see if they can fill in instead of Jones etc. Maguire wont magically become quicker, and Lindelof wont magically become a dominant CB or a leader.
I dont agree we favoured Smalling over Jones, Rojo and Bailly. He was the only one with any value.

it would have been perfectly reasonable for the club to say to the manger that he can bring in Maguire, but needs at least one CB off the books - the only one we could get a decent loan for, and now transfer fee for us Smalling.
 

reddevilz007

Full Member
Joined
May 12, 2013
Messages
1,816
Latest offer quoted is up to 17 mil euros for Smalling. We better accept this, and move on quickly with our own purchases.
 

Tel074

New Member
Joined
May 8, 2019
Messages
1,531
I dont agree we favoured Smalling over Jones, Rojo and Bailly. He was the only one with any value.

it would have been perfectly reasonable for the club to say to the manger that he can bring in Maguire, but needs at least one CB off the books - the only one we could get a decent loan for, and now transfer fee for us Smalling.

And there alone tells the tale of how badly the club is being run . That we allow a better player to leave solely because he's wanted by another club while keeping lesser players
 

davidmichael

Full Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2015
Messages
3,473
We won’t get £20 million or €20 million for Smalling, we’ll end up loaning him back to Roma with obligation to buy for €8 million or something because we can’t negotiate incomings or outgoings on even a semi competent level.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,789
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
£20m??? Good money? Is he really a quarter of the player Maguire is? Answer: No.
I don't get this. He is 31, our staff for reasons I don't understand didn't want to keep him, and he just came off arguably his best season. Most players his age go for peanuts. If it wasn't for corvid we'd comfortably have gotten 40m for him off the back of his loan form. I count that as a win. The loss is we will still be stuck with useless Jones and won't be bringing in a reinforcement to improve us.
 

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
I don't get this. He is 31, our staff for reasons I don't understand didn't want to keep him, and he just came off arguably his best season. Most players his age go for peanuts. If it wasn't for corvid we'd comfortably have gotten 40m for him off the back of his loan form. I count that as a win. The loss is we will still be stuck with useless Jones and won't be bringing in a reinforcement to improve us.
I followed you, until you said you count his departure as a "win". The idea of a loan situation is that you keep tabs on the individual on loan and if he performs then it gives you a potential option.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,399
Location
Hope, We Lose
And there alone tells the tale of how badly the club is being run . That we allow a better player to leave solely because he's wanted by another club while keeping lesser players
He also wanted to leave for what he thought was a good chance and it worked out for him. He was told Lindelof would start and Tuanzabe would be the backup, he can obviously do better than being 3rd or 4th choice CB at United and he wants to do that
 

Woodenlung

Full Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
2,467
Just sell him. He really isn't that good and the Dee raised could lead to us signing another player.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,789
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
I followed you, until you said you count his departure as a "win". The idea of a loan situation is that you keep tabs on the individual on loan and if he performs then it gives you a potential option.
He gave us the potential option to raise money to get an upgrade. Sadly our transfer controllers are shockingly too incompetent to take advantage.
 

0le

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2017
Messages
5,806
Location
UK
We need to keep him. He is our best defender.
 

RedDevilCanuck

Quite dreamy - blue eyes, blond hair, tanned skin
Joined
Feb 22, 2007
Messages
8,446
Location
The GTA
Our defenders:

A crazy man, a weak and passive man, a slow man, a sick not, a crazy Argentine, and an actual defender with a very good track record but looks awkward when passing and probably will go to Rome.
 

frookydinho

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
154
People have short memories. Smalling is not good enough. I remember him going to Roma the reaction of relief and finally moving on average squad players.

Yet here we are and people are demanding he stays and plays
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,943
People have short memories. Smalling is not good enough. I remember him going to Roma the reaction of relief and finally moving on average squad players.
Actually revisit the thread as this is not the truth.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,435
Just because our current lot aren’t good enough doesn’t mean you should keep someone who isn’t either.

Move on. He wants to. So do United.
 

MattofManchester

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2018
Messages
3,813
Smalling and Lindelof was and is still a better partnership than Lindelof and Maguire. They're average, but they're one of our better average ones.
 

BigBebe

Full Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
877
Location
Are you the ref?
Smalling is our best defender. He is not a great defender but he is better than the others we have. He will never be the man for silky passes out of defence but he is actually reasonable at the basic job of stopping goals.

Watching yesterday's game, yes there were individual errors, but if you just look at the basic shape and positioning of our defenders, it was utterly shambolic. Smalling at least brings is some ORGANISATION to the defence.

Woodward has made some catastrophic moves in the transfer market in his time but selling Smalling could be right up there as one of his worst.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,482
Have to agree Smalling is to handsy grabby for me but all in all right now he would be a welcome returnee to the fold unless there is more to his being shipped out than we know
 

G4stars

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 30, 2015
Messages
44
I find it totally strange why we would let Smalling go. At this point in time he would be the 1st defender on the team sheet. I just don't get it.

Not one of Maguire, Bailly or Lindelof has proved to be any better.
 

christinaa

Gossip Girl
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
11,602
Supports
There's only one United!
Why lose Chris Smalling for £20m?

Because ED needs some cash to try to fund Cavani.
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,523
He can't play out from the back, even the relegation candidates play out from the back. Selling him is the right decision. I think Blind is the one we shouldn't have sold but that ship sailed a long time ago.
 

Infestissumam

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
2,309
Location
Austria
how the feck has this deal not happened? Are we being difficult or are Roma being cheap ... or both? Just mind-boggling. It feels like there's been hundreds of report of Roma offers all summer, they clearly want him and we're not asking for the moon. Crazy stuff.
 

OneUnited24

Full Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2008
Messages
9,867
Man he must be pissed. However it’s good to see consistency in our board. They suck on both fronts
 

ti vu

Full Member
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
12,799
WTF. Conflict report.

If Smalling not leaving, would he get registered to play? We're now 2 or so player over the limit.
 

Woodenlung

Full Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
2,467
Can't sell a player who wasn't in the managers plans, who wanted to leave, who had a willing buyer.

:lol::lol::lol:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.