g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
City, Spurs and Arsenal all received around 10M which is basically printing money considering how much veto rights clubs get on the final edit + the "free" marketing boost.Doesn't anyone have any (realistic) estimates as to how much this kind of deal would be worth for United?
A sadistYes please, more United the better.
Thanks. Yeah, that sort of fee sounds reasonable. For £15m, plus further exposure/marketing, it makes sense. As a kid in the 90s, I was probably drawn to United by the marketing - the cup final songs, I remember having a United edition of Beano (or it was an edition that had a United section), and my mate having a season review/highlights video which we watched together about 50 times. At the time, United were well ahead of the curve, as basic and cheesy as it seems today. We were also either the first to do pre-season tours abroad, or at least upped the scale of it, bringing in a huge worldwide audience. We need to catch up with the times.City, Spurs and Arsenal all received around 10M which is basically printing money considering how much veto rights clubs get on the final edit + the "free" marketing boost.
United could probably milk it and get a few millions more but there's no way it goes over 15/20. Amazon doesn't really make money on these, it's produced at loss just to grab even more Prime subscribers.
Oh god (we need a puking emoji)Spurs apparently received £10M from their Amazon documentary. Not that I think we should be doing this from a sporting perspective, but there are plenty of interesting sagas happening that United fans would love to know about, if not watch. We should be demanding £50M minimum if this goes ahead. It may even end up being an annualised series...
Netflix is mainly subs yes, hence why they're in deep sh*t. Shows cost dozens to hundreds of millions to be made and they dont get you millions new subscribers and even less long-term ones.Thanks. Yeah, that sort of fee sounds reasonable. For £15m, plus further exposure/marketing, it makes sense. As a kid in the 90s, I was probably drawn to United by the marketing - the cup final songs, I remember having a United edition of Beano (or it was an edition that had a United section), and my mate having a season review/highlights video which we watched together about 50 times. At the time, United were well ahead of the curve, as basic and cheesy as it seems today. We were also either the first to do pre-season tours abroad, or at least upped the scale of it, bringing in a huge worldwide audience. We need to catch up with the times.
I would add, aren't all Amazon Video/Netflix revenues purely from subscriptions? So all their shows would be made at a loss, discounting subscriptions
It wasn’t for alcohol, it was for a fruit juice. Jack-off Joel is such a cheapskate, he couldn’t even let £1 slip by.Zlatan is Muslim mate he doesn't drink.
Unneeded distraction.Please do.
(Arsenal started last season with L L L, and they filmed it, now the cameras have gone to somewhere else its been W W W W so don't dismiss it out of hand). It is actually a shame they are not doing United this season, new start and all that - plus possibly Ronaldo's last season before he goes to America or Saudi Arabia).
Actually, if you dressed him in black and a cool hat, ETH would look like Heisenberg!
An episode.They missed a trick. I would have paid £100.
Nah. This is just bread & circus drama for small clubs. We should be better than that.Wish we had one for this season, I would have paid good money for that.
What a season it's been and it would have been great joy to see the side's evolution from that abysmal start.
It's not though is it?Nah. This is just bread & circus drama for small clubs. We should be better than that.
Username checks out (although I agree with you!)I’d rather we didn’t.
That’s how I see it and I’d much rather it didn’t happenNah. This is just bread & circus drama for small clubs. We should be better than that.
Feels like something drama queens like Barca and the dippers do. We’re better than that.Username checks out (although I agree with you!)
Not necessarily if we're actually winning things, I know the chances of them showing anything juicy is pretty low if the club has any control over the final product but I still would love to see some backstage footage like what happened in our dressing room before the Barcelona second half.Nah. This is just bread & circus drama for small clubs. We should be better than that.
All Or Nothing was an NFL thing first I believe, and those ones have been brilliant, much the same as Hard Knocks which has been going for many years and is great.Not a fan of this. Reduces professional sport to Tik-Tok consumer goods and that I'm firmly against.
All the sports that want to do it are just desperate because they cannot sell themselves to the Gen Zs and younger. It was F1 who did it first because were dying with younger audiences, then there's talk of it with tennis (same reason) and this is not much different.
But maybe if they tried charging less for football and made it more accessible, this wouldn't be a problem. Looking at you, chief rat Glazer.