Josh 76
Full Member
- Joined
- Mar 14, 2018
- Messages
- 5,598
It's not them. It's Klopp!I know we should hate them, but we need to become them.
Spirit and passion, I'd kill for some of what they've got.
It's not them. It's Klopp!I know we should hate them, but we need to become them.
Spirit and passion, I'd kill for some of what they've got.
Well you seen them off in that title race and poch was there. He bottled the CL final against Liverpool despite being the better teamYou're stretching it a bit now !!!
Nah, while you may be technically correct, the narrative is that they missed a lot of first team players and brought on some kids, while your lot are mercenaries. They made this point a few times at the end of the match, about how their kids overcame your overpaid stars.It's insane how everyone is just buying into the narrative that they're ravaged with injuries and playing youngsters. Chelsea had just as many injuries and our team was younger than theirs.
Liverpool probably deserved to win that, just based on extra time but there's no need to make it out as though it some Herculean effort against all odds. They were the favourites FFS!
He’s not been on the CAF in three months.@Amadaeus you ok?
It's going to be hero worship every time Klopp farts between now and the end of the season.Chelsea actually started AND finished the game with a team younger than theirs, but the media had pre-agreed their narrative and people are too stupid to form their own opinions, they just let the commentary team tell them what to think.
Not gonna lie it's sort of why, as depressing as it is to say, I sort of want City to win the title again this season. Feel like it'd be the perfect anti-climactic way to piss on that parade.It's going to be hero worship every time Klopp farts between now and the end of the season.
If the win the league, I think we might see Neville and co lining up to give him a rusty trombone live on Sky Sports.
I mean there is a third option which would pretty clearly be preferable, surely?Not gonna lie it's sort of why, as depressing as it is to say, I sort of want City to win the title again this season. Feel like it'd be the perfect anti-climactic way to piss on that parade.
Ehh, Arsenal winning it in many respects would be preferable but then you'd have the almost equally irritating Arsenal wankfest on Sky.I mean there is a third option which would pretty clearly be preferable, surely?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Someone showed me how it offside in the end. So I think it was the correct decision but honestly at the time it felt like I was watching American football.Same- pmsl but feck knows what was up with that.
Feck off.I know we should hate them, but we need to become them.
Spirit and passion, I'd kill for some of what they've got.
I didn't see it, but Klopp gets a tune out of the players he manages and you have to respect that, massively. They are rivals, but I respect Liverpool FC, great club and great fans.Poch should be sacked for that, how can such as expensively assembled squad be unable to beat Liverpool's kids, they just gave up and didnt even try for most of the extra time.
A lot think that Man City winning is meaningless (I know they used to think the same about Chelsea).Liverpool, ok, but United-fans wanting City to win over Arsenal is just strange.
If Arsenal win would be "irritating" is all it takes, i guess people here genuinely don't even mind City winning it anymore.
Ruins the games with his insufferable nonsense and it's even worse with Carragher and Neville piping up every now and again so much worse.Drury is actually unbearable.
I mind. I mind the 115s winning four in a row. I mind the Scousers winning it too (still preferable to the 115s unfortunately).Liverpool, ok, but United-fans wanting City to win over Arsenal is just strange.
If Arsenal win would be "irritating" is all it takes, i guess people here genuinely don't even mind City winning it anymore.
I really don't rate Poch very highly at all. The media seem to love him though. Personally I feel they would have been further ahead to have struck with Potter.Well you seen them off in that title race and poch was there. He bottled the CL final against Liverpool despite being the better team
I get that, that's why my initial question was a genuine one. Who are your big injury absences? I know Silva and Reece James. Can't think of any more.Shitter for sure but younger!
I ain't having "lost against kids" when they were older and the bloke who scored the winner is a 32 year old world record transfer.
They are currently missing James, Silva, Badiashile, Cucurella, Wesley Fofana, Chukwuemeka, Ugochukwu, and LaviaI get that, that's why my initial question was a genuine one. Who are your big injury absences? I know Silva and Reece James. Can't think of any more.
Oh come on. BehaveI know we should hate them, but we need to become them.
Spirit and passion, I'd kill for some of what they've got.
No far from it"Also"? You think this Chelsea team today was elite?
You conveniently forgot about Szoboszlai, Jota, Nunez, Jones, Thiago, Matip. 2 to 4 are most likely starters, other would have been options from the bench. Then Gravenberch got eliminated as well. That's almost a complete 11.Liverpool were missing Salah, Alisson and Alexander Arnold.
So James and SilvaThey are currently missing James, Silva, Badiashile, Cucurella, Wesley Fofana, Chukwuemeka, Ugochukwu, and Lavia
So James and Silva
Relax. I mentioned those three because I think they are the ones who can turn a game with a moment, on their own. These other names you list are not miles better than who ended up starting anyway.You conveniently forgot about Szoboszlai, Jota, Nunez, Jones, Thiago, Matip. 2 to 4 are most likely starters, other would have been options from the bench. Then Gravenberch got eliminated as well. That's almost a complete 11.
So James and Silva
So you don't think Nunez and Jota are good game changers? You think these two are the same quality as Gakpo and Elliot?Relax. I mentioned those three because I think they are the ones who can turn a game with a moment, on their own. These other names you list are not miles better than who ended up starting anyway.
The 11 for Liverpool cost 160 million pounds whilst Chelseas 11 cost 530 millionDiaz, Gakpo, Konate, Virgil, Robertson, Endo, Gravenberch, Mac Allister, Kelleher. 9 of 11 players who started today are expensive and experienced players. Lets not overreact here.
'Not miles better' means 'same quality'. Yes. You got me.So you don't think Nunez and Jota are good game changers? You think these two are the same quality as Gakpo and Elliot?
I can see why Utd fans rate Hoijlund so highly now. With this level of insight Utd have a very long way to go before they wake up.
No one's saying that Chelsea haven't wasted close to a billion.The 11 for Liverpool cost 160 million pounds whilst Chelseas 11 cost 530 million
I think an overreaction is warranted
You don't think Jota and Nunez are miles better than Gakpo and Elliot? Then you need to watch more football.'Not miles better' means 'same quality'. Yes. You got me.
The most over hyped player in recent times. In an era when social media has brainwashed the football world!
I respect Liverpool and Arsenal as football clubs. However I don’t respect City as a football club. I don’t take anything they win seriously. Hence them winning anything hurts less than Liverpool or ArsenalLiverpool, ok, but United-fans wanting City to win over Arsenal is just strange.
If Arsenal win would be "irritating" is all it takes, i guess people here genuinely don't even mind City winning it anymore.
160 mil? . 300 mil euros was payed for that first 11 today.The 11 for Liverpool cost 160 million pounds whilst Chelseas 11 cost 530 million
I think an overreaction is warranted
They kind of did though.160 mil? . 300 mil euros was payed for that first 11 today.
And what Chelsea have with this? We are not talking about Celski. We are talking about myth (which is now all over media) how you won it with kids. You didn't win it with kids and you didn't win it with some kind of cheap B team.