horsechoker
The Caf's Roy Keane.
hoooo boy. This is a bad take.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
hoooo boy. This is a bad take.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wow. What a clown.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
This has been taken out of context to make him look bad. It’s been worded very badly no doubt but he was comparing it in football terms and in no way trying to disrespect the people who lost their lives. Literally goes on to explain himself seconds later but this fella has cropped the video before you can hear his explanation.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Was just going to write thisPretty much agree with whatever Nev said about United. ETH came into a tough job and it’s been made much worse by Ronaldo & the recruitment. You genuinely watch that show & think about the attacks of the big clubs and then try to see how in this world are we planning to compete with what we have
Glazers want to be 4th place, so we are now competing with Arsenal, West Ham and Lester.try to see how in this world are we planning to compete with what we have
I'd tend to agree were it not for us outspending just about everyone over the last 10 years. The Glazers did try and recruit Pep and Klopp but Fergie and Woodward took it in turns to feck that up. Had we recruited either, combined with the spending I think we would be top 1 or 2 the last few years.Glazers want to be 4th place, so we are now competing with Arsenal, West Ham and Lester.
Any person that believes our hierarchy wants us to be at the top needs their head examined.
That Spurs fan was a bit cocky. Seems like signing Lenglet and Richarlison has made him think they’re the undisputed 3rd best side in the league. They’ll be in for a surprise.Ty was not there, so it's already a win. But the Arsenal segment was a bit boring to be honest, nothing really interesting. The Spurs guy is a live version of the Arsenal thread "you spent 200M you should be going for the league"
Tottenham being able to close down on Liverpool and fight for 2nd/3rd was a weird one from Neville. I think they would need a catastrophic chain of events for it to happen.
Unfortunately a lot of the fan channels have atrocious football knowledge but are popular for other reasons. I think Robbie from AFTV, the Liverpool and Everton lads have decent knowledge, the City fan too despite being annoying. Her and the Spurs lad are wank.That only fans Chelsea lass is insufferable.
Not seen it yet but probably moreso, last time was too much and had to skip forward.Is it even worth watching without a Ty meltdown.
Been in my pub, she's lovelyThat only fans Chelsea lass is insufferable.
The way they're going on you'd have thought they'd have already dispatched one or two of the "top 6" when all they've faced is relegation teams and a work in progress United (which they lost to).I don't understand why fans get so defensive and offended at the suggestion their team could miss out on top 4.
There's 6 teams going for 4 spots. Even if 6 teams have a great season, 2 of them have to miss out. It's not a slight on any team to think they may miss out but just an acknowledgement that the competition is difficult and it will be a close race.
So many Arsenal fans are bizarrely overconfident, they have as much chance as anyone else of getting 3rd or 4th but by the same token they have as much chance as anyone else of taking 5th or 6th.
Every "popular" Arsenal fan that gets invited are too biased and annoying. Liked the United one in the middle, forgot his name, didn't have to shout like a 6y old to express himself.Robbie is far too biased with Arsenal. It's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with him about them. Ty is way more fecking annoying than him but surprisingly both are equally irritating to debate on the subject.
He's done an incredible job with that channel engineering the false impression that's he a calm knowledgable guy.Robbie is far too biased with Arsenal. It's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with him about them. Ty is way more fecking annoying than him but surprisingly both are equally irritating to debate on the subject.
I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.Carragher endeared me in this one simply because he's the only pundit brave enough to point out it's a clear foul on Eriksen. Everyone else are sheep going with the "too soft" narrative.
Yeah exactly right.I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.
It's all that donut of a ref's fault, allowing it to go, and a goal arising.
If he blows immediately, there's absolutely nothing to make that foul stand out above 25-30 fouls every game.
It's funny isn't it. I've had Arsenal fans at work saying how soft it was, never a foul...then proceed to tell me about other incidents when there was contact against Saka in the box that wasn't a penalty and it should have been?I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.
It's all that donut of a ref's fault, allowing it to go, and a goal arising.
If he blows immediately, there's absolutely nothing to make that foul stand out above 25-30 fouls every game.
There truly is nothing more tedious than whataboutery.It's funny isn't it. I've had Arsenal fans at work saying how soft it was, never a foul...then proceed to tell me about other incidents when there was contact against Saka in the box that wasn't a penalty and it should have been?
So what is it? They're annoyed that VAR caught this one and not in their previous games. Not because of the actual challenge. That's the rub of it.
How does it makes up for that?Carragher is an idiot and he makes up for it by shouting the loudest.
One of the paddock lads seemed to be making that point but it got drowned out.I like Carragher but he’s being weird about Martinez. Wish they’ve have gone into it more about how he was happy to judge him after 2 games but now suddenly it’s “too early to judge” after 6 games where he’s been great in the last 4.
JoeEvery "popular" Arsenal fan that gets invited are too biased and annoying. Liked the United one in the middle, forgot his name, didn't have to shout like a 6y old to express himself.
I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.
It's all that donut of a ref's fault, allowing it to go, and a goal arising.
If he blows immediately, there's absolutely nothing to make that foul stand out above 25-30 fouls every game.