horsechoker
The Caf's Ezza.
hoooo boy. This is a bad take.
Was just going to write thisPretty much agree with whatever Nev said about United. ETH came into a tough job and it’s been made much worse by Ronaldo & the recruitment. You genuinely watch that show & think about the attacks of the big clubs and then try to see how in this world are we planning to compete with what we have
try to see how in this world are we planning to compete with what we have
Glazers want to be 4th place, so we are now competing with Arsenal, West Ham and Lester.
Any person that believes our hierarchy wants us to be at the top needs their head examined.
Ty was not there, so it's already a win. But the Arsenal segment was a bit boring to be honest, nothing really interesting. The Spurs guy is a live version of the Arsenal thread "you spent 200M you should be going for the league"
Tottenham being able to close down on Liverpool and fight for 2nd/3rd was a weird one from Neville. I think they would need a catastrophic chain of events for it to happen.
That only fans Chelsea lass is insufferable.
Is it even worth watching without a Ty meltdown.
That only fans Chelsea lass is insufferable.
The way they're going on you'd have thought they'd have already dispatched one or two of the "top 6" when all they've faced is relegation teams and a work in progress United (which they lost to).I don't understand why fans get so defensive and offended at the suggestion their team could miss out on top 4.
There's 6 teams going for 4 spots. Even if 6 teams have a great season, 2 of them have to miss out. It's not a slight on any team to think they may miss out but just an acknowledgement that the competition is difficult and it will be a close race.
So many Arsenal fans are bizarrely overconfident, they have as much chance as anyone else of getting 3rd or 4th but by the same token they have as much chance as anyone else of taking 5th or 6th.
Every "popular" Arsenal fan that gets invited are too biased and annoying. Liked the United one in the middle, forgot his name, didn't have to shout like a 6y old to express himself.Robbie is far too biased with Arsenal. It's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with him about them. Ty is way more fecking annoying than him but surprisingly both are equally irritating to debate on the subject.
Robbie is far too biased with Arsenal. It's impossible to have a reasonable discussion with him about them. Ty is way more fecking annoying than him but surprisingly both are equally irritating to debate on the subject.
Carragher endeared me in this one simply because he's the only pundit brave enough to point out it's a clear foul on Eriksen. Everyone else are sheep going with the "too soft" narrative.
I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.
It's all that donut of a ref's fault, allowing it to go, and a goal arising.
If he blows immediately, there's absolutely nothing to make that foul stand out above 25-30 fouls every game.
I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.
It's all that donut of a ref's fault, allowing it to go, and a goal arising.
If he blows immediately, there's absolutely nothing to make that foul stand out above 25-30 fouls every game.
It's funny isn't it. I've had Arsenal fans at work saying how soft it was, never a foul...then proceed to tell me about other incidents when there was contact against Saka in the box that wasn't a penalty and it should have been?
So what is it? They're annoyed that VAR caught this one and not in their previous games. Not because of the actual challenge. That's the rub of it.
How does it makes up for that?Carragher is an idiot and he makes up for it by shouting the loudest.
I like Carragher but he’s being weird about Martinez. Wish they’ve have gone into it more about how he was happy to judge him after 2 games but now suddenly it’s “too early to judge” after 6 games where he’s been great in the last 4.
JoeEvery "popular" Arsenal fan that gets invited are too biased and annoying. Liked the United one in the middle, forgot his name, didn't have to shout like a 6y old to express himself.
I can't remember such an obvious foul being debated for so long.
It's all that donut of a ref's fault, allowing it to go, and a goal arising.
If he blows immediately, there's absolutely nothing to make that foul stand out above 25-30 fouls every game.