- Joined
- Dec 17, 2013
- Messages
- 11,616
- Supports
- Brazil, Arsenal,LA Aztecs
All reasonable points. There was clearly no shortage of goals, creativity and match-winning ability there. I'd just reiterate that they didn't necessarily seem to ramp each other up in terms of productivity in the way you'd expect from such a famous combination, and in some ways it can be seen as a zero sum game between Best and Law as regards to who actually got the goals, with their combined totals actually declining in general as Best hit his stride:
1963-64: 52 goals between Best and Law
1964-65: 53 goals
1965-66: 41 goals
1966-67: 35 goals
1967-68: 42 goals
1968-69: 52 goals
Now that doesn't tell the full story given that Law was getting older and more injury-prone, but given Law's own views on the matter I think it's not outrageous to state that only one of those two will be at their absolute best at a given time. Will there be enough firepower to score in a given match anyway? Sure, but when the sheen of that proven partnership is dulled slightly I think we have a strong argument for having the better attacking unit. Muller is the best goalscorer on the pitch, and maybe the best ever, and Matthews/Muller is just a classic creator/scorer duo with minimal room for friction. Rivaldo had probably the third highest goalscoring peak on the pitch after the two No. 9s, and he too looks right at home playing off a centre forward as he did at his peak. Notably, he was able to keep a very high level of productivity even when said forward was a dominant scorer like Ronaldo at WC 2002.
If either you or skizzo drafts any combo with those three in the future you are going to regret this post