Isn't that because he's supporting a child who has cancer and has a scar like that?
The fact that news is centred around things like that ^
Isn't that because he's supporting a child who has cancer and has a scar like that?
The fact that news is centred around things like that ^
I have no problem with the lost of consciouness you are debating alone here, if you lose conscious you have to go to the hospital.Every single one of those protocols will include "loss of consciousness" as a key criteria in deciding whether or not someone is concussed. If any player, in any sport, is knocked unconscious he should not be allowed to continue. You're right that there's shades of grey in assessing the severity/extent of a concussion but being KO'd is one aspect where the guidance is black and white. Look at the recent Froch fight, for example. The ref stopped counting as soon as it was obvious that Groves was unconscious even though he probably could have beaten a 10 count.
Here's a link to some guidance produced by the IRB. Any medic following this guidance wuld not have allowed Pereirra to continue playing.
http://www.irbplayerwelfare.com/?documentid=112
Football should produce something similar, or someone is going to get badly hurt.
http://group.bmj.com/group/media/la...follow-international-guidelines-on-concussion
Ok, cool. I know I'm labouring the point but it's quite important everyone reading the thread doesn't get misinformed. A lot of us will play amateur football and need to know it's not ok to play on after being KO'd.I have no problem will the lost of consciouness you are debating alone here, if you lose conscious you have to go to the hospital. B
what? Chelsea just won the champions league when he chose them.Top players going to clubs for money. The fact is they're gonna make millions either way, just pure greed. (Hazard)
Don't worry you are right, we need to be careful.Ok, cool. I know I'm labouring the point but it's quite important everyone reading the thread doesn't get misinformed. A lot of us will play amateur football and need to know it's not ok to play on after being KO'd.
Well, that and me being an argumentative cnut!
I did it once and think I very much regretted it.I have no problem with the lost of consciouness you are debating alone here, if you lose conscious you have to go to the hospital. B
Yes money was a factor, but you said 'players who go to clubs for money' as if that's the one and only benefit to the move.Money was the biggest factor. Chelsea finished 6th that season, we were champions. We offered probably somewhere around 100k and Chelsea 200k plus their manager situation.
How do you know what the biggest factor was? How do you know what each club offered him?Money was the biggest factor. Chelsea finished 6th that season, we were champions. We offered probably somewhere around 100k and Chelsea 200k plus their manager situation.
Why ?I did it once and think I very much regretted it.
Well said.Worse thing about modern football? The false 9. The classic No 9 is the lead Singer of a rock band. I grew up watching Van Basten, Bastituta, Shearer, Romario, Ronaldo, Ruud et al, and they were footballing gods. Playing without a no 9 is like listening to the Rolling Stones without Mick Jagger.
By all accounts he cut the zig zag in his hair in support of a young spanish lad whom had surgery on his brain, surgery that Ronaldo paid for.
The fact that news is centred around things like that ^
Yeah, false 9s or deep-lying centre forwards from Hidegkuti to Messi have been 'packing the midfield'.Well said.
The term itself is just pretentious twaddle to avoid saying "packing the midfield".
We didn't win any trophy that season while Chelsea won the Champions League.Money was the biggest factor. Chelsea finished 6th that season, we were champions. We offered probably somewhere around 100k and Chelsea 200k plus their manager situation.
Ah, I meant continued playing after being KO'd, seems the knock on effects are worse than I thought.Why ?
Yeah, that's not cool a feeling. Once i lost colored vision.Ah, I meant continued playing after being KO'd, seems the knock on effects are worse than I thought.
The term has certainly been butchered in the last couple of seasons as a catch-all for any central striker who isn't just a big man playing back to goal or a wee man poaching in the box.Well said.
The term itself is just pretentious twaddle to avoid saying "packing the midfield".
Thank you.Yeah, false 9s or deep-lying centre forwards from Hidegkuti to Messi have been 'packing the midfield'.
I heard that this morning too a while after posting it, but my point was not about his specific hair cut but the general necessity for players to have flash hair cuts and designs in their hair...Nani is a huge culprit.By all accounts he cut the zig zag in his hair in support of a young spanish lad whom had surgery on his brain, surgery that Ronaldo paid for.
Hasn't been confirmed though
'Necessity' is a weird word to use. Most footballers don't have hairstyles any flashier than the same short back and sides that every other man has these days (like Luke Shaw). Some do, but they'd probably still do it even if they weren't footballers. So how it really relates to football, I don't know.I heard that this morning too a while after posting it, but my point was not about his specific hair cut but the general necessity for players to have flash hair cuts and designs in their hair...Nani is a huge culprit.
Yeah but tattoos are awesome'Necessity' is a weird word to use. Most footballers don't have hairstyles any flashier than the same short back and sides that every other man has these days (like Luke Shaw). Some do, but they'd probably still do it even if they weren't footballers. So how it really relates to football, I don't know.
If any trend in football can be described as anything like a 'necessity' it's tattoos.
I first met a lad I know in the early nineties and he was an avid Liverpool fan, by 1995 swung around he was a massive Blackburn Rovers supporter, these days he is seen wearing an Arsenal shirt.Anyone who changes club should have the word traitor branded in their forehead
Things i hate about the modern game. Fans who are bothered by haircuts of players. Get a grip.I heard that this morning too a while after posting it, but my point was not about his specific hair cut but the general necessity for players to have flash hair cuts and designs in their hair...Nani is a huge culprit.
Feel free to beat him. No court in the land would blame youI first met a lad I know in the early nineties and he was an avid Liverpool fan, by 1995 swung around he was a massive Blackburn Rovers supporter, these days he is seen wearing an Arsenal shirt.
I mean that's just wrong, I even remember when Blackburn beat us 2-0 at Ewood Park, I was at home listening to the game on the radio and when they scored the second, this bellend appeared at my front door to take the mike mouse out of me. To think that just a few years before he was wearing Liverpool shirts and these days it's arsenal makes me sick.
whats the point in the thread then...Things i hate about the modern game. Fans who are bothered by haircuts of players. Get a grip.
and again.Far and away at number 1 is the total disregard of head injuries and concussions.
Sickeningly stuck in the dark age stuff.
I remember hearing that sort of thing in the 60's and 70'sI hate the hero worship. Maybe it's not the same everywhere but it's like I always hear not that Portugal scored a vital last gasp goal or that Valela scored a vital last gasp goal, but that Ronaldo set it up.
Better than the soulless and bland PR that most official communication channels perpetuate.Huge bump but club twitter accounts thinking they're comedians. You will have the odd account that does post something genuinely amusing but for the most part it seems pretty unprofessional and I don't understand why it's became an okay thing. /grumpy old man.