If they would offer Pjanic + cash I would absolutely snap their hand off. Don't see it happening unfortunately.
Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter KM
- Start date
- Status
I think I would accept this offer knowing that it means Madrid get shafted
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
What a weird and angry man you are. If you had opened the article, it clearly said that the club is looking for Tielemans, Rabiot and Rice. Instead you looked at the headline and went out on this weird rant
Sounds like a load of bollocks from shit stirring Luckhurst. Though we would do well to avoid certain agents (Raiola) who are known to shop their players around and drive up the price.
We need 4 players to compete for 4th! We are NEVER going to be in a title challenge next season.
I presume that’s a cack-handed way of saying we’re not going to get drawn into auctions this summer. Which is sort of sensible but, let’s be honest, beggars can’t be choosers.
So the plan to get us back to the summit of European football is to exclusively sign players that nobody is interested in.
He's such a moron. Luckhurst just ten mins ago posted an article where he said:
"The MEN previously reported United remain interested in Adrien Rabiot of Paris Saint-Germain and admire West Ham's Declan Rice and Monaco's Youri Tielemans."
"The club has focused on the British market this summer amid interest in England Under-21 international Aaron Wan-Bissaka and senior regular Harry Maguire."
Given the interest of Spurs, Leicester in Tielemans. Various continental teams in Rabiot. City's interest in Maguire. He has just contradicted himself.
So our transfer strategy is to target players other big clubs don't want? Sure it is Mr. Luckhurst
"This club can do things other's can only dream of"
"United in record breaking income"
"We are loaded"
What do you expect?
There were some reports that he's definitely leaving form a Juve journo.
He's the biggest prick going. I ignore him.
Lurkhurst exists to wind us up.
Really? Well if he says both then one statement will be right I guess
unless we sign no one 
https://t.co/wxdBXYDDCEReally? Well if he says both then one statement will be right I guess
It's in this article. What a clown.
One of the off-the-pitch reasons I love European football so much (compared to the big American sports) is that players cannot simply be traded against their will. They have to be willing to and then agree to a new contract. Which is why I don’t see ya getting too far with player swaps.
Some quarters of our fan base are delirious. They seem overly eager to be negative about our club and believe every little thing that paints us negatively. The press have seen this and pray upon it which is why Woodward and United are disproportionately mentioned, especially in a negative light.What a weird and angry man you are. If you had opened the article, it clearly said that the club is looking for Tielemans, Rabiot and Rice. Instead you looked at the headline and went out on this weird rant
It's quite sad how crazed grown adults get over transfers nowadays - hence all the fake ITKs. I'd understand venting at the end of the window, but during the window when we know nothing...? Drama Queens
He's in tier 3 for reliability. How?
His transfer value hasn't improved since he joined us seeing as he plays decent for 10 games a season for the last what, 3 years?
Is Lloris worth Double De Gea because he won the world cup?
Think logically, Pogba is probably worth what we paid for him and no more. Plus he wants to leave. 180 is absurd, that figure is reserved for world class players. Pogba is average
So we and Brighton have best scouts in the world, i guess
Absolutely ridiculous.
So force an unhappy to player to stay against his will when he only shows up for a handful of games anyway?
Good plan
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Good planning.
You have to admire the ruthlessness of City in the transfer market. They see areas that need improvement and they get it done no messing around.
Yes, do.
There is a reason Real Madrid and Juventus want him.
Despite the disappointing season he has had his best personal season in football and with a good side around him not consisting of Young, Matic, Lingard etc he will thrive and these clubs know this.
Combine this with the remaining time on his contract and he is easily worth £150m...
This is without mentioning what he brings in a marketing sense.
This is how top clubs are expected to work. We have been doing exact opposite for last 6 years. Rewarding mediocrity.
We better continue our shopping in the Championship then.
Why not do what City are doing and pay release clauses?
Luckhurst seems to be a bit of a gobshite
They have a bottomless pit of money and don't really need much to strengthen their squad because has already spent more than £600m in 3 years, on top of an already strong squad he inherited. There is nothing to admire about their transfer business.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
THREE YEARS!!!!!! Our contract negotiating team are insane.
ok a 3 year deal is madness. I was ok with a 1 year or 1+1 but 3 years? insane.
If we've offered Mata a three year deal this place will be in full on meltdown.
Excellent. Thats our RW sorted for foreseeable future then. Onto the next one.
If this is our strategy, why would we tell him?
If true, I can’t wrap my head around that one.
Hope I'm wrong but can't see players like Longstaff and James working out for us. Longstaff has played 7 games in the PL. They need more experience. If we buy him, hope we loan him out for a year.
Why are people taking this luckhurst idiot seriously?
Mata with 3 year deal.
Mata with 3 year deal.
How would I know what? That we're not in for Rodri or that he won't flop?
- Status