Inter Yer Nan
Full Member
United get rejected for 90m but Leicester accept 65m? Yeah, that makes sense.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
United get rejected for 90m but Leicester accept 65m? Yeah, that makes sense.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Oh my this is getting comical now and I'm bored of it alreadyTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
And when City gets they player, they beat us to it. When we got the player, is always because City pulls out. How convenient.United get rejected for 90m but Leicester accept 65m? Yeah, that makes sense.
Haha. first Koulibaly and now Maguire.. both valuations dropped from 150/90m to 95/65m.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Yes, every year.Has transfer window journalism (I use the word journalism extremely reluctantly) ever been this insanely erratic and borderline nonsensical in terms of the constantly shifting numbers involved, degree of progress involved in transactions etc.?
Why do we get quoted close to £90 million?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Ye I wasn't having a go mate, more just responding to the general idea that seems to have made its way around that he's useless going forward. Also, thought the article was a really interesting read and goes into really good detail about all aspects of his game.I will read the article at a later time, I asked the question because, as stated in the initial post, I'm not familiar with his attacking output, and majority of the posts/analyses of him I've seen focus on his defensive side. I did not ask it because I'm on the fence regarding signing him.
not arsed about moving but agreed terms with three clubs? okay mate
Different price for United, so doubt we get hm for 65If Maguire is going for 65M, then we should buy, in my opinion.
United and Palace officials have been in talks since the weekend over a fee for the England Under-21 right-back, with the Selhurst Park club wanting at least £50m guaranteed for the 21-year-old.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
How do you poise yourself to do something?Always find it funny, when united are poised to sign the value becomes 80 or 90 millions but when city is poised the value is 65 million.
United and Palace officials have been in talks since the weekend over a fee for the England Under-21 right-back, with the Selhurst Park club wanting at least £50m guaranteed for the 21-year-old.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Palace also want United to remove the sell-on clause that was part of the deal that took Wilfried Zaha back to Palace in January 2015.
That's more like it. No more poising crap, just sign them.How do you poise yourself to do something?
Poised:
H having a composed and self-assured manner.
Any tweets from The Sun today?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We reportedly pulled out a few weeks ago when it became obvious that Raiola had simply used us to get him a better deal elsewhere.No mention of us in De Ligt article at all. I really think we are truly out of the race for him. He's not coming here. It's Maguire or none
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I actually thought I'd deleted that oneThat's more like it. No more poising crap, just sign them.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He wasn’t taken over United, but Spurs. There is a big difference. It is like saying Brendan Roger took 4 years to make leceister top four and champions league finalist over Lampard at Chelsea. Difference in the quality of the squad and resource is a big factor. Plus, I believe it took Poch only 1 season to make spurs top four candidate.And your favourite poch was given 4 years to do that.
City are known to leak much lowered transfer fees to the press. They like to keep up this absurd pretence of doing things on a shoe string budget. It’s totally patheticWhy do we get quoted close to £90 million?
Whereas we leak higher fees to the press right? Yet somehow with their lower leaked fees and our higher leaked fees, we’ve both spent roughly the same if you took a look at the respective accounts of both teams over the past 6 years. Maybe the ABU media now also prepare both set of accounts too? Did the USA fake the moon landing too?City are known to leak much lowered transfer fees to the press. They like to keep up this absurd pretence of doing things on a shoe string budget. It’s totally pathetic
He doesn’t have just one job to focus on right now, though. That’s part of the problem and why we need a DoF (or whatever the hell the club wants to call it).It’s ridiculous how long this is taking. What is Woody doing every day? He has one job to focus on right now.
Whereas we leak higher fees to the press right? Yet somehow with their lower leaked fees and our higher leaked fees, we’ve both spent roughly the same if you took a look at the respective accounts of both teams over the past 6 years. Maybe the ABU media now also prepare both set of accounts too? Did the USA fake the moon landing too?
They're having our pants right down it that's what we give them.United and Palace officials have been in talks since the weekend over a fee for the England Under-21 right-back, with the Selhurst Park club wanting at least £50m guaranteed for the 21-year-old.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Palace also want United to remove the sell-on clause that was part of the deal that took Wilfried Zaha back to Palace in January 2015.