Transfer Tweets - 2019/20 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.

FujiVice

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
7,365
80 million and we get the pleasure of paying Gareth Bale's wages? Where do we sign.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,346
Why do we simply believe anything said by a random person on Twitter?
 

deafepl

New Member
Joined
May 19, 2017
Messages
2,974
I know Andreas Periera is an average player but I have a strong feeling that Ole will use him as advanced midfielders with new two DM/CM sitting who will control the games and let Andres Periera do his thing as soon as he sorts out the weight of passing and composure on the ball, he'll be a top player. I can see him put more work rate in defense than Pogba would

We won't buy Pogba's replacement but invest in top attacking and defense with Bruno and Longstaff we sign even if Pogba stays. We won't miss Pogba's creativity much, all of his creativity come from wide of long passing and loft passes but not through ball or breaking the line.

I hope Andreas Periera can save us 100m on new fancy CM replacement for Pogba.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,346
I know Andreas Periera is an average player but I have a strong feeling that Ole will use him as advanced midfielders with new two DM/CM sitting who will control the games and let Andres Periera do his thing as soon as he sorts out the weight of passing and composure on the ball, he'll be a top player.

We won't buy Pogba's replacement but invest in top attacking and defense with Bruno and Longstaff we sign even if Pogba stays.

I hope Andreas Periera can save us 100m on new fancy CM replacement for Pogba.
Yeah we can keep hoping but it will be another season down the drain.

These players just aren't capable of achieving anything. Time and time again these feckers have let us down and they will do it again.
 

Johnnyredboots

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 1, 2013
Messages
246
Seriously hope we tell Madrid to stuff it regarding any deal with Pogba involving Bale.

Last thing we need is pocket change and being lumbered with 350k per week past it perma-crock for our best player.

150mil or nothing.
 

Bullhitter

New Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
766
Location
in the opposite direction of crowds
Supports
Chelsea
RLC apparently earn 150k, nobody care. When Rashford signed new contract worth 200k per week, yet everyone feel so outraged about this
Loftus-Cheek is a far better talent than Rashford and our wage bill is quite balanced across the whole squad and under control, not inflated paying top wages to average players because of a couple of desperation contract (offers)s.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,642
Location
DownUnder
Loftus-Cheek is a far better talent than Rashford and our wage bill is quite balanced across the whole squad and under control, not inflated paying top wages to average players because of a couple of desperation contract (offers)s.
:lol::lol::lol:

Chelsea wage bill v total turnover is 55%, United's 50%, so you need to fact check.

As for Loftus-Cheek being a better player, I really don't know where to begin :lol::lol::lol:
 

reddev3

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2018
Messages
461
I know Andreas Periera is an average player but I have a strong feeling that Ole will use him as advanced midfielders with new two DM/CM sitting who will control the games and let Andres Periera do his thing as soon as he sorts out the weight of passing and composure on the ball, he'll be a top player. I can see him put more work rate in defense than Pogba would

We won't buy Pogba's replacement but invest in top attacking and defense with Bruno and Longstaff we sign even if Pogba stays. We won't miss Pogba's creativity much, all of his creativity come from wide of long passing and loft passes but not through ball or breaking the line.

I hope Andreas Periera can save us 100m on new fancy CM replacement for Pogba.

You think Adreas will be playing the furthest forward in a midfield containing Fernades? thats bold. I think if Pogba goes he probably moves to 4231 like you say as I think I read he used that mostly at Molde with 4-3-3 in tougher games. I would guess Fernandes furthest up and Longstaff and Mctominay in a two. You can still drop Bruno deeper in bigger games to the right of a 3 as he has played a lot there also.

They will probably try and get the best CM possible with the Pogba money as well if they can judging by the Saul links.

For me Periera stays for a similar role as he had last year but just a little more frequently, a squad player covering a couple of positions.
 

Bullhitter

New Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2019
Messages
766
Location
in the opposite direction of crowds
Supports
Chelsea
:lol::lol::lol:

Chelsea wage bill v total turnover is 55%, United's 50%, so you need to fact check.

As for Loftus-Cheek being a better player, I really don't know where to begin :lol::lol::lol:
On who is the better talent, you are entitled to your opinion, I very strongly disagree (I will say that with words rather than six smilies). I would say a very decent % of United fans would say Loftus-Cheek is the superior talent and very few Chelsea fans would rather have Rashford.

You miss the point re wages. Obviously United's turnover is massive but that doesn't mean a player at United should be on more money than he would be worth if he were at another club.

55% is under control ( at least it most certainly doesn't qualify as out of control) and wages are well balanced across the squad, we don't have a player earning 3-5 times what others in the squad are that is artificially inflating the wage demands of and offers to players that would never get the same offer elsewhere.
 

Red_toad

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2010
Messages
11,642
Location
DownUnder
On who is the better talent, you are entitled to your opinion, I very strongly disagree (I will say that with words rather than six smilies). I would say a very decent % of United fans would say Loftus-Cheek is the superior talent and very few Chelsea fans would rather have Rashford.

You miss the point re wages. Obviously United's turnover is massive but that doesn't mean a player at United should be on more money than he would be worth if he were at another club.

55% is under control ( at least it most certainly doesn't qualify as out of control) and wages are well balanced across the squad, we don't have a player earning 3-5 times what others in the squad are that is artificially inflating the wage demands of and offers to players that would never get the same offer elsewhere.
50% is more under control and your opinion is incorrect. Only a Chelsea fan would be of that opinion and only extremely bias ones at that.
 

Cantona in disguise

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
722
Loftus-Cheek is a far better talent than Rashford and our wage bill is quite balanced across the whole squad and under control, not inflated paying top wages to average players because of a couple of desperation contract (offers)s.
I rarely laugh at someone on here but... behave. Haha
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,826
Loftus-Cheek is a far better talent than Rashford and our wage bill is quite balanced across the whole squad and under control, not inflated paying top wages to average players because of a couple of desperation contract (offers)s.
Dude about time your username should be changed to bullshitter going by some of the posts.
 

Kaivalya

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2018
Messages
231
Can anyone make sense of this?

Supposedly a 130m release clause, but Atletico are only entitled to 81m of that and would have to pay the rest to retain him.

I've never heard of anything of the sort and it makes no sense.
I dont understand it either.
Who would Atletico be paying the 50m to retain Saul? The way Spanish clauses work is the player is released into the free market and then obligated to sign for the new club.
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,979
Loftus-Cheek is a far better talent than Rashford and our wage bill is quite balanced across the whole squad and under control, not inflated paying top wages to average players because of a couple of desperation contract (offers)s.
And people complain about my posts in the "transfer" thread...
 

Gasolin

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2007
Messages
6,107
Location
NYC
You do know thats not how the football market operates right
I do know that we should set a precedent because Real is insulting us. We gave them a good deal with Ronaldo and now they think it's an open bar... so yeah, I think we should show to Pogba, Raiola, Real and Juventus that if you want something, you should value it, and act accordingly.
 

Tosicsleftpeg

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2010
Messages
3,835
Location
Carlos Valderamas hair
Such a strange summer for us, massive state of flux at the moment. Really wouldn't mind Pogba going now as I think the fanfare around him, both good and bad is a bit mad. Lukaku leaving is another thing I'm not that bothered about and seeing him go to inter for decent money would be good for us and for him, his streaky side is REALLY streaky and if he's not scoring he's not much good and we can't carry someone like that.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,626
Loftus-Cheek is a far better talent than Rashford and our wage bill is quite balanced across the whole squad and under control, not inflated paying top wages to average players because of a couple of desperation contract (offers)s.
Delirious opinion.
 

M Utd

Full Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2018
Messages
317
If we have any sense and Pogba does leave this season we need to conclude our buying of midfield players. As a club we usually pay a little more than other clubs, factor in other clubs knowing we are further desperate need of players and the club we buy from knowing we got a big sum from sales will push the price higher still. Liverpool suffered something similar when the sold Torres. Carroll was suddenly £35m ish.

In years gone by quiet transfer dealing were easier. These days everyone and his dog has a social network account and agents leak news all the time for their and their clients benefit.
 

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,714
Location
Barrow In Furness
Why should United sell quickly when buying clubs aren't prepared to pay what the club wants?
I don't think we will get that amount of money for him. However what Real and Juve are offering is not enough. Real's offer is derogatory and if they want to include a player I do not want either Isco or Bale. It would have to be someone much better than that, somebody who will improve us. I honestly think we should buy the midfield replacement for him and if we do not sell him, he can rot in the reserves. I just don't want a petulant Paul Pogba in that dressing room, we have seen in the past the damage he can do.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,488
I have never felt less bothered about the prospect of one of our top players leaving the football club.
Strange, you must have full confidence that he'll be adequately replaced? Because he's our best player by some distance.
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Rafael Varane and 75 Million cash would be an acceptable compromise.
 

Sunny Jim

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
29,434
Location
Warsaw...that's too far away from Edinburgh...
I dont understand it either.
Who would Atletico be paying the 50m to retain Saul? The way Spanish clauses work is the player is released into the free market and then obligated to sign for the new club.
Maybe part of the sum is income tax which the player is due to pay (given the buying club transfers money to the player's account so he himself can buy out his contract).
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,488
You know he won't be adequatly replaced. Not with this idiot in charge.

I think next season will be a terrible experience and maybe the penny will drop for the owners and they sack Ed the idiot.
Agreed. So if we can't replace him, let's not sell him yet.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,242
Location
Hell on Earth
Is the rumours are correct, Juve only received like 60+M of the 80+ transfer fee. So I can see why they are paying 120m -- double of what they had originally received. I can see them thinking of that as a fair deal.
 

Sanche7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 22, 2018
Messages
2,796
120 mill plus a player would do. Would have taken Cancelo but we already have AWB, so there’s no point in getting Cancelo
 

Sultan

Gentleness adorns everything
Joined
Sep 1, 2004
Messages
48,569
Location
Redcafe
Agreed. So if we can't replace him, let's not sell him yet.
Very difficult to keep a player intent on leaving and not happy at the club. The club just needs to make good of a situation which is quite frequent in football. Might not be possible to replace him as an individual but a team can be assembled which can be bettered without Pogba.
 

Eric's Seagull

Full Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
3,707
Location
4-4-2: The Flat One
Why should United sell quickly when buying clubs aren't prepared to pay what the club wants?
Think we should sell quickly so that hopefully Woody gets replacement in quickly as I cant Woody freeing up funds until we sell Pogba, of which I hope we invest the full fee if we can;t get any players in exchange. Hoping this gets done soon, as the longer it takes the more excuse it gives Woody to say something like we were after 'x' player but didn't have enough time to get said transfer done.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.