Falk vs. Stone - battle of the whisperers.
Transfer Tweets - 2020/21 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik and Imran hold a long overdue conversation about United's awful league form with 1 win in 7. They discuss a disappointing draw at Bournemouth, a not so disappointing draw against Liverpool and a crushing defeat at Chelsea - Is time nearly over for Erik Ten Hag?
Then in a special second half of the pod, Nik welcomes Natalie ( https://twitter.com/natalie_17) to discuss the fortunes of Manchester United Women as they booked a place in the FA Cup Final after a historic first ever win vs. Chelsea.
- Status
No I go with the delayed “Here.....we......go“like Heath Ledgers Joker.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
That's a fitting name for an agent.
So if we get Sancho for reported €120m, considering that City have a sell-on clause, will we effectively be financing their Torres acquisition?
Couldn't care less.
Oh great! I was really losing my sleep asking myself over and over again, whether or not you would care about it.
Why would it matter though? Shouldn't we get him because of it?
Sleep-ception
It was an interesting observation, no need to get your knickers twisted because of it.
Right winger that had a good individual season at Valencia, going for less than €30m is interesting. Wonder why we can't do deals like this...
Last edited:
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Wanted first team football, so signs for Lille.....who then sends him on loan to the Bottom half of the Primeira Liga, Boavista. Makes sense.
do they have a sell on clause?
We have our own strengths too, which other PL club can point to a couple £100m talents in Rashford and Greenwood all of whom we got for free. If you look at the impact Rashford, Greenwood, McTominay and William's have had I think it balances out in the end.
We overpay for the players we need but we have a you set up that gives us two superstars, a potential DM for the next ten years and a utility player. That is before the likes of Tuanzebe and Henderson are factored in. How much is that in saved transfer fees?
Well yeah it does, he'll be getting first team football.
It is very strange, you would have thought if he had insisted on a loan for him to sign a new contract then we would have done it rather than lose a potentially multi-million pound asset.
Poorly advised to say the least.
It does make no sense, as he could have gone on loan whilst under contract with us
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Dunno, it was purely hypothetical from my part.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
So because we got a lot of talent coming through we should not try to get good talent for cheap as well? Are those two mutually exclusive?
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Absolute bargain if it's true about 10m deal. Liverpool are good at this transfer lark.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
With Brentford failing to reach the premiership, that lad, Benrahma will be the selling block i presume?
Roma prepare an offer of a 5 year loan with an expired £50 voucher for Carluccios option to buy
Can't see Norwich selling him for that cheap.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Is he a defender
Hes an LB
Isn't it normal that clubs pay players through several years? Dortmund expect
120 mil at once? I doubt it is true
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Something we apparently prevented him from doing, even though he wanted to go on loan.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
- Status