He has a point. We’ve been talking about this cultural reset, so clearing the mercenaries like Sanchez. We then go and sign a galactico looking for his last pay day.
He has no point. We can sign who we want if we feel they can contribute. We are not obligated to sign a more shit striker than Cavani to prove that we have put ‘thought’ into it - he is an obvious choice as striker cover as he is unattached and proven top quality. We sign a footballer looking for a club. The ‘galactico looking for his last pay day’ is the negative interpretation you choose to put on it, and is a generalisation of every Latin player leaving a big club, the same nonsense applied to James. Cavani has every right to continue his career somewhere, he’s a footballer who still has something to offer and no club. So long as the manager has had a word and is satisfied, these stereotypical generalisations are not needed. Cavani is just a footballer, the rest is all guff. Would it be more noble to have signed Sturridge or something? And what’s the difference between him and Zlatan?
There is always a media complaint with every player we sign. Too late, too old, too young, not good enough, too high a salary, too many injuries, no planning (as if they would have a clue). Cavani is a top striker, signed for free. If they wanted to, they could speak far more positively about it.
Because we talk about cultural reset we shouldn’t sign Cavani? What is out new culture then? Just sign Brits? I imagine the mantra is signing players with the right attitude and hunger. Only harmful prejudice and generalisations would lazily exclude Cavani from such a category.