Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.

DomesticTadpole

Doom-monger obsessed with Herrera & the M.E.N.
Joined
Jun 4, 2011
Messages
101,629
Location
Barrow In Furness
We haven't sold anyone, right? Few loans and that is it.
Shiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiit.
It is our fault. They over pay players who now think they are worth that sort of money. Which might be why we are having problems even shifting the likes of Brandon Williams out on loan because clubs won't pay the loan fee. It will be a raft of loans to get Pereira and the likes out at the end of the transfer window. Then we have the same problem again next summer.
 

DULLAGHAN

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 16, 2020
Messages
147
IF Varane takes 19 he's taking Amad's number.
19 isn't confirmed and my understanding is he only takes 19 if Diallo goes on loan. Either way players shouldn't be dictating terms to the club, we need to get back to the idea that playing for the club is an honour.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,450
Location
Dublin, Ireland
It is our fault. They over pay players who now think they are worth that sort of money. Which might be why we are having problems even shifting the likes of Brandon Williams out on loan because clubs won't pay the loan fee. It will be a raft of loans to get Pereira and the likes out at the end of the transfer window. Then we have the same problem again next summer.
Our valuation of players is off in many cases. Look at Romero last summer, was poised to join Everton for a couple of million then United raised it to wanting 7 million. Fast forward a year and he’s released on a free. What’s the point?
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,660
Our valuation of players is off in many cases. Look at Romero last summer, was poised to join Everton for a couple of million then United raised it to wanting 7 million. Fast forward a year and he’s released on a free. What’s the point?
Not just released on a free, but also a year of wages were also paid by us during the last season
 

No Idea For Nickname

Patroness Saint of the anti-RAWKites
Joined
Jan 1, 2015
Messages
19,799
Location
Split, Croatia
Our valuation of players is off in many cases. Look at Romero last summer, was poised to join Everton for a couple of million then United raised it to wanting 7 million. Fast forward a year and he’s released on a free. What’s the point?
Was the same with Darmian, Juve wanted him and was willing to pay 10-12 mil. Euros, next season he left fot fish and chips. Some people at the club really are horrible at their job. Not to mention giving new contracts to "protect the assets".
 

James35

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
3,982
Location
Cardiff
Our valuation of players is off in many cases. Look at Romero last summer, was poised to join Everton for a couple of million then United raised it to wanting 7 million. Fast forward a year and he’s released on a free. What’s the point?
Exactly we paid like 4m in wages to not use him and lose him for free instead. Brilliant piece of business that was.
 

giggs-beckham

Clueless
Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
6,987
It is our fault. They over pay players who now think they are worth that sort of money. Which might be why we are having problems even shifting the likes of Brandon Williams out on loan because clubs won't pay the loan fee. It will be a raft of loans to get Pereira and the likes out at the end of the transfer window. Then we have the same problem again next summer.
I think it's still good to loan the deadwood as you trim a year off of their stupid contracts
 

Jacob

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
25,578
Our valuation of players is off in many cases. Look at Romero last summer, was poised to join Everton for a couple of million then United raised it to wanting 7 million. Fast forward a year and he’s released on a free. What’s the point?
Two points;

1) You get to keep them one additional season for whatever reason
2) It's about the messaging, market value or nothing

Having said that, for petty fees I agree we should've sold them, especially considering we're paying wages on top of not getting a transfer fee.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,892
Our valuation of players is off in many cases. Look at Romero last summer, was poised to join Everton for a couple of million then United raised it to wanting 7 million. Fast forward a year and he’s released on a free. What’s the point?
"Protecting their value"
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,450
Location
Dublin, Ireland
"Protecting their value"
Romero let’s say got 4m in wages
Everton offered 2 - 3m to take him
We say give us 7. Everton walk away
We keep him for a year, pay him wages then he walks for free.

id say it’s more like “protecting our debt”
 

Fooza

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2014
Messages
3,173
no way they pay 50 million for him, he didn't do all that much did he?
that is what I thought till I saw this, I wouldn't put it pass them over paying like they did on ben white

 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,892
Romero let’s say got 4m in wages
Everton offered 2 - 3m to take him
We say give us 7. Everton walk away
We keep him for a year, pay him wages then he walks for free.

id say it’s more like “protecting our debt”
It's incredibly stupid, don't get me wrong, but the only rationale I can think of is that the club thinks they can get transfer fees for them. No idea who makes those assessments.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,442
Location
left wing
It's incredibly stupid, don't get me wrong, but the only rationale I can think of is that the club thinks they can get transfer fees for them. No idea who makes those assessments.
I would assume that, like most monumental cockups, it's an Ed Woodward special.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
4,013
No idea; but IF it’s true and IF it is, the likes of Haaland might find less money next summer for wages. Though I’m sure certain clubs can be creative in getting around it
The proposal being talked about is a soft salary cap. So any spending over the limit is then taxed with the funds redistributed into prize money and lower league solidarity.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
4,013
Two points;

1) You get to keep them one additional season for whatever reason
2) It's about the messaging, market value or nothing

Having said that, for petty fees I agree we should've sold them, especially considering we're paying wages on top of not getting a transfer fee.
Possible insurance against De Gea or Henderson leaving as well. Hendo was being linked to Spurs and Chelsea and making a big fuss about being no1.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
4,013
Legally very hard to enforce.

The way around it usually is to only allow a percentage of earnings to be used for the wage bill. This already in sport and works well
Wouldn’t they just make it voluntary in the same way that clubs have to agree to certain conditions to partake in European football. So while you could pay bigger salaries you wouldn’t be able to take up your place in European competition as those rules are set by UEFA as a private entity and they can have what rules they want. You are choosing to sign up to them in order to compete.
 

Syphon Wallet

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2014
Messages
437
Possible insurance against De Gea or Henderson leaving as well. Hendo was being linked to Spurs and Chelsea and making a big fuss about being no1.
This.
4m in wages isn't that much for a club like united.
It's overkill for a 3rd keeper yes, but we still needed one and we shouldn't set a precedent that clubs can roll us over with ridiculous offers.

Having said that, we are very poor at getting consistent value for our sales.
Wages are a massive part of this, we need to get control of the wages for squaddies like Jones, lingard etc
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,450
Location
Dublin, Ireland
The proposal being talked about is a soft salary cap. So any spending over the limit is then taxed with the funds redistributed into prize money and lower league solidarity.
Oh. Not sure how I feel about that.

so a club that buys the best talent, goes over their limit then probably wins back a portion of it anyway in prize money
 

Widow

Full Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2020
Messages
7,193
Location
Can't spell Mkhitaryan
Wouldn’t they just make it voluntary in the same way that clubs have to agree to certain conditions to partake in European football. So while you could pay bigger salaries you wouldn’t be able to take up your place in European competition as those rules are set by UEFA as a private entity and they can have what rules they want. You are choosing to sign up to them in order to compete.
I'd imagine so but they wouldn't want push back from the big teams (Super League pt2) also, only allowing teams that sign up for this wouldn't really be voluntary.
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,779
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
Ødegaard for 40 million may turn out to be abit of a coup.
Liked what I saw of him last season.
 

golden_blunder

Site admin. Manchester United fan
Staff
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
120,450
Location
Dublin, Ireland
This.
4m in wages isn't that much for a club like united.
It's overkill for a 3rd keeper yes, but we still needed one and we shouldn't set a precedent that clubs can roll us over with ridiculous offers.

Having said that, we are very poor at getting consistent value for our sales.
Wages are a massive part of this, we need to get control of the wages for squaddies like Jones, lingard etc
Technically Grant was our 3rd keeper last season.
 

sparx99

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2016
Messages
4,013
I'd imagine so but they wouldn't want push back from the big teams (Super League pt2) also, only allowing teams that sign up for this wouldn't really be voluntary.
What I mean is all European competition is voluntary. We don’t have to take our place in the Champions League. We choose to for obvious reasons but we accept UEFA as the controller of the competition. If UEFA clubs vote this through then you are right it’s not really voluntary as you’d be left on your own (as Real Madrid, Barca and Juventus have been with the super league).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.