Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.

theklr

Full Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2019
Messages
2,659
Just so jealous of how proactive they are always. Even when it doesn’t work out they fill the holes they have in the squad.
Ah, thats true. Easy when you dont need to care about money I guess
 

Adamsk7

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
2,708
He’s not remotely a DM or the player we need. Honestly I’d rather wait for a target that actually makes sense. Camavinga wanted Madrid, Saul wasn’t right and Neves isn’t currently good enough. Let’s be honest here.

Next summer it’ll be our number one priority and we’ll have the money to spend.

So much crying on here and socials. We’ve had a bloody amazing window! Some are acting like spoiled brats
 

pascell

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2012
Messages
14,189
Location
Sir Alex Ferguson Stand
Can't wait for the next fans forum when Woody and Joel tell us how we "invested heavily" in improving the first team squad, yet after the James sale we've broke even, maybe even made profit for this summer.
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Ah, thats true. Easy when you dont need to care about money I guess
Neither do we. Not signing a CM isn’t because of money. This was a must do deal. Is he exactly what we need? No. Is our CM situation that dire? Yes.
 

Hansi Fick

New Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
5,057
Supports
FC Bayern
Seems like Chelsea, Juventus, and PSG feel the need to hoard all the world's decent midfielders. I hate them.
Strange list considering Juventus didn't have a single decent midfielder before they signed Locatelli, and midfield is arguably the area where PSG are the least stacked.

Even Chelsea's midfield wasn't exactly brimming with quality in depth, really, let's not pretend like everyone rated Jorginho that highly, or Kovacic for that matter. I certainly didn't, and kind of still don't.
 

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,559
Supports
Everton
Rice is a more 'United' signing in midfield than any of the others you've been linked with this window.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,659
He’s not remotely a DM or the player we need. Honestly I’d rather wait for a target that actually makes sense. Camavinga wanted Madrid, Saul wasn’t right and Neves isn’t currently good enough. Let’s be honest here.

Next summer it’ll be our number one priority and we’ll have the money to spend.

So much crying on here and socials. We’ve had a bloody amazing window! Some are acting like spoiled brats
Next summer we will need to sign a world class striker, and potentially replace Pogba. So by not getting a DM now we are just trying to catch up every season. Getting it done now would make far more sense.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,659
Can't wait for the next fans forum when Woody and Joel tell us how we "invested heavily" in improving the first team squad, yet after the James sale we've broke even, maybe even made profit for this summer.
How do you work that one out?
 

BluesJr

Owns the moral low ground
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
9,052
Next summer we will need to sign a world class striker, and potentially replace Pogba. So by not getting a DM now we are just trying to catch up every season. Getting it done now would make far more sense.
People don’t realise we’ve been saying “we’ll be complete next season” since SAF retired. It’s a never ending process. It’s obscene.
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,308
Can't wait for the next fans forum when Woody and Joel tell us how we "invested heavily" in improving the first team squad, yet after the James sale we've broke even, maybe even made profit for this summer.
How?
 

Pace Abuser

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Messages
1,722
Because we are paying for the incoming over a number of years in instalments. Total expenditure is something like 26 million this year.

And he's taking the James fee as one lump sum, neglecting to factor that that too is being paid in instalments.

It's an intellectually dishonest point to say we've broke even on the net spend this season.
 

SATA

Full Member
Joined
Nov 8, 2005
Messages
15,221
Location
We all love United
Paying Sancho off over 5 years, Varane over 4 and Ronaldo over 5.

£14.6m for Sancho
£11m for Varane
£4m for Ronaldo
£29.6m total

£28.2m for James

Fair enough it's not profit but net spend of -£1/2m isn't great.
It really doesn’t work like that
 

mazhar13

Kermit Inc. 2022
Scout
Joined
Sep 10, 2013
Messages
36,817
Location
Toronto, ON, Canada
Can't wait for the next fans forum when Woody and Joel tell us how we "invested heavily" in improving the first team squad, yet after the James sale we've broke even, maybe even made profit for this summer.
The income statement is not a true indication of the cash in hand. If you want to know whether United would have had the cash available for more signings, check the cash flow statement.

We're paying for our transfers in installments, but we're also receiving the transfer fees in installments.
 

Devil_forever

You're only young once, you can be immature f'ever
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
Head of the naval division of lolibfascon
Paying Sancho off over 5 years, Varane over 4 and Ronaldo over 5.

£14.6m for Sancho
£11m for Varane
£4m for Ronaldo
£29.6m total

£28.2m for James

Fair enough it's not profit but net spend of -£1/2m isn't great.
What about the transfers from last year, the year before and the year before that which were also meant to be paid in instalments? Which would be paid this year? Oh and you do realise that Leeds will be paying that fee in instalments too right? Its the norm in football.

Take a look at the outgoings every year in transfers in our accounts, you might be in for a shock with just how much we've spent and just how much will leave our accounts this year.
 

Withnail

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
30,155
Location
The Arena of the Unwell
Paying Sancho off over 5 years, Varane over 4 and Ronaldo over 5.

£14.6m for Sancho
£11m for Varane
£4m for Ronaldo
£29.6m total

£28.2m for James

Fair enough it's not profit but net spend of -£1/2m isn't great.
That's not really how it works though.

And if you're looking at it that way are you also leaving out all the transfer fees we're still paying off. How much is left there?
 

alexthelion

Full Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2019
Messages
3,624
Can't wait for the next fans forum when Woody and Joel tell us how we "invested heavily" in improving the first team squad, yet after the James sale we've broke even, maybe even made profit for this summer.
?????????????????????
 

Idxomer

Full Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2014
Messages
15,308
Because we are paying for the incoming over a number of years in instalments. Total expenditure is something like 26 million this year.

And he's taking the James fee as one lump sum, neglecting to factor that that too is being paid in instalments.

It's an intellectually dishonest point to say we've broke even on the net spend this season.
It's the 1st time I've seen people calculate transfers like that, good PR from United leaking these figures to the press I guess.

We've spent about 120m on players without add-ons and received 25m in sales, all the other numbers are just noise for me.
 

Mickeza

still gets no respect
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
14,110
Location
Deepthroating information to Howard Nurse.
Paying Sancho off over 5 years, Varane over 4 and Ronaldo over 5.

£14.6m for Sancho
£11m for Varane
£4m for Ronaldo
£29.6m total

£28.2m for James

Fair enough it's not profit but net spend of -£1/2m isn't great.
How much are we paying for other transfers this year? How much have we committed next year instalments? Would another signing impact our ability to sign players next year? Is the James fee in one sum? How much has our wage bill increased? How much will it further increase with Shaw, Bruno and Pogba contracts? Are we limited by FFP? Well done though. We’ve only signed Varane, Sancho and fecking Ronaldo. Let’s all have a good whinge eh.
 

HailtotheKing

Full Member
Joined
Aug 28, 2018
Messages
1,015
Location
NYC
He’s not remotely a DM or the player we need. Honestly I’d rather wait for a target that actually makes sense. Camavinga wanted Madrid, Saul wasn’t right and Neves isn’t currently good enough. Let’s be honest here.

Next summer it’ll be our number one priority and we’ll have the money to spend.

So much crying on here and socials. We’ve had a bloody amazing window! Some are acting like spoiled brats
If we were buying Saul, sure. But as a loan it was a deal absolutely worth doing. If we get no one else it was a huge miss.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,483
Paying Sancho off over 5 years, Varane over 4 and Ronaldo over 5.

£14.6m for Sancho
£11m for Varane
£4m for Ronaldo
£29.6m total

£28.2m for James

Fair enough it's not profit but net spend of -£1/2m isn't great.
Curious to see how you are going to double down on this.

I have a feeling you'll just ignore all these posts.
 

FPL addict

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 20, 2021
Messages
95
Supports
Leeds Utd
Paying Sancho off over 5 years, Varane over 4 and Ronaldo over 5.

£14.6m for Sancho
£11m for Varane
£4m for Ronaldo
£29.6m total

£28.2m for James

Fair enough it's not profit but net spend of -£1/2m isn't great.

Are you forgetting the big increase in an already hugely bloated wage bill ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.