They will be earning more than they are currently by moving in terms of wages so no they won't be demanding to compensate for lost wages .
Transfer Tweets - Manchester United - 2023/24
- Thread starter mazhar13
- Start date
-
Hello, Guest! We have two new competitions (with taglines and awards as prizes) starting for the new Premier League season.
A new Premier League Predictions competition is starting now. Click here to enter to submit predictions for MD1.
A new Last Man Standing competition is starting now. Click here to enter to submit predictions for MD1.
For Last Man Standing you have until the 16th August to submit your predictions. Submissions will be open for the next 20 days, 16 hours, 57 minutes, 6 seconds, and will close on Aug 16, 2024 at 20:00.
Bonus: for fans of Odds or Evens, the thread will be going up mid-August with a deadline for after the transfer window shuts.
- Status
I think both Kane and Neymar are moving to teams that will pay them significantly more than what they earn now hence selling club does not have to pay anything to the departing player
In our case most of our players that we get rid of are sold to teams that might pay them less than what they earn at United, hence some times the club will agree some sort of a payment term to incentivise the player to leave.
Its easier for the selling club to define the payoff rather than the buying club butvfactoring it into the transfer. This avoids upsetting the buying clubs wage structure and players
Let’s get Todibo then
Why? Everton paid £33m last summer for him and would want double that at least - probably more.
Think it’s a bit of a bollocks story.
Two Onanas?
Would only take him if we still got Amrabat,however pretty certain it would only be one or the other and know which I prefer
Isn’t Amrabat cheaper and better?
I’d say it is in the case they’re getting England’s vice captain for £30mil & are paying him ‘only’ £100k a week.
Cheaper, yes. Better, I'm not too sure about that. They are very different profile of midfielders but Amrabat might struggle to really make an impact in the PL. Every time I've seen him play for Fiorentina, he thrives when the game suits his pace.
The PL will be a very different cup of tea and Onana has great potential, and yet could still contribute immediately.
For over £50m?
Just buy Lavia.
Just buy Lavia.
It won’t be. It may be the first that you’ve heard off but it certainly won’t be the first that a financial settlement has had to be agreedThe only transfer in the history of transfers where we have to pay a player off
Source (Tier 1):
Again, that seems like a remarkably low fee for a player who did very well out on loan last year.
£5m is ridiculous.
He had a good loan playing 40 games for Preston.
He had a good loan playing 40 games for Preston.
£5 million for Preston’s Young player of the year last season???? Why are we low balling we must really be short of cash flow.
If he was a city/Liverpool /Chelsea player they’d be looking for £15 million and that’s not exaggerated.
Hopefully it will come with buyback clause/first refusal etc. for that low transfer fee.
Maybe one of the transfer guys was off on holidays since before we signed Onana and just got back, sat down at his desk and saw an old sticky note saying "Todo: Sign Onana" and here we are...
That's ridiculous... he will turn out to be a better left back than Malacia will.
The reason the transfer fee is that low is probably because we'd have a 12-15 mill buyback or 40-50% sell on fee.
he is painfully average. I do not believe these links.
Disagree
He seems more of the Fred profile rather than being able step in and cover for Casemiro.
He'd probably be an improvement on McT in backing up Casemiro but doesn't seem a good fit if the intention is to be cover for Casemiro (as well as playing alongside him in tougher games).
Aside from the profile, from what I've seen I'm not convinced he's all that good anyway.
If he was a City Chelsea or Dortmund loanee he'd be selling for £20m in this window. Just the usual United clownshow.
What part? the average or the false rumors? or both?
That he is painfully averageWhat part? the average or the false rumors? or both?
Agree to disagree.
Time will tell
Why not look at his showing on Saturday
I am not going to lie. I have not seen him more than 10 times play. So my judgment is maybe tainted by the Everton and Belgium shows last season. But what I remember off his performances was not impressive. Amrabat gave him a game to forget and he was subbed off in the 60th min in the world cup game against Morocco.
I’m not as big a fan as some around here. Don’t think he’s good defensively and lacks pace. Let him go elsewhere to reinvent himself and buy him back if he becomes good. There’s no point holding him just for the sake of it to loan him again
I’m a bit gutted to read that, yeah hopefully a buy back option and sell on clause inserted in any sale. Looks a good player to me, better on the ball than Malacia also from what I have seen.
We do seem to be quite desperate for money. Hopefully we will see some movement on Amrabat soon.
Genuinely thought he’d be good enough for the first team. He was more talented than Jurado from reports.
Last edited:
Disappointed by that. Think he has a lot of potential and certainly should be going for more than €7m if we are to sell him. Don't see why we'd be considering selling for that amount, not like it's going to make the difference in terms of getting another player and his wages will be low.
We had two Djembas in midfield a long time ago...
If there's a buyback clause I imagine it would have to be fixed at a higher sum. A sell on clause attached also might decrease the upfront price.
Not many of the youngsters we purchased over the past few years and had high hopes for have progressed that well have they?
It's pretty much just Sancho and Antony though isn't it? Still quite early to write off Antony completely also, even if he hasn't been great so far. Apart from those 2 we've tended to go for older players or players coming into their prime.
- Status