Of course it's two different subjects. You were saying that people are getting cancelled for not accepting 50+ genders, but what you're saying now is that they're getting cancelled if they're saying that non-binary people aren't non-binary. Those are obviously different things.
As for your evidence of this cancelling, you refer to social media backlash: that people who disagree with the "woke narrative" receive insults and hate shows both this cancelling and that you can't disagree with said narrative. I assume I can use the same methodology as you just did, and that you would be ok with that. Just on the last page, in
comment #1 424 we can see a few examples of trans people getting harassed to such an extent that they're driven to suicide or have to flee the country. In a less extreme example, what first came to my mind when thinking about non-binary representation in the media was Star Trek Discovery, so here is the tweet where Blu del Barrio and Ian Alexander were welcomed to the franchise:
As you can see, there are some negative reactions here. ST keeps losing fans, this is queer theory, tokenism, "diversity" more important than script, no one wants to see this, mental illness, queer baiting, et. etc.
Given that just existing as trans will be met with backlash, hate, insults and abuse on social media, does that mean that you cannot agree with the "woke narrative" without getting cancelled?