UK General Election - 12th December 2019 | Con 365, Lab 203, LD 11, SNP 48, Other 23 - Tory Majority of 80

How do you intend to vote in the 2019 General Election if eligible?

  • Brexit Party

    Votes: 30 4.3%
  • Conservatives

    Votes: 73 10.6%
  • DUP

    Votes: 5 0.7%
  • Green

    Votes: 23 3.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 355 51.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 58 8.4%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 3 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 9 1.3%
  • SNP

    Votes: 19 2.8%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 6 0.9%
  • Independent

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Other (BNP, Change UK, UUP and anyone else that I have forgotten)

    Votes: 10 1.4%
  • Not voting

    Votes: 57 8.3%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 41 5.9%

  • Total voters
    690
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Sweet Square

ˈkämyənəst
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
24,203
Location
The Zone
It depends why they are poor. Lazy knob heads who can’t be arsed working why should I give a shit? People who are pro active and work hard? Different question all together. I’ve seen this shit first hand under Labour. One half of my family were wasters, did feck all other than breed like rats, sponge off family and the government. Would you believe it but they had to start working when the free lunch was withdrawn.
Really have a bit of self respect and class pride, for christ sake. Just say you aren't interesting in helping the poor, that they deserve the conditions they live in. To her credit Thatcher was at least honest about this.
Finally! Thats more like it.

:lol:
 
Last edited:

esmufc07

Brad
Scout
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
49,932
Location
Lake Jonathan Creek
I’ve had to block Darren Grimes and Tom Harwood on Twitter. I’m all for different opinions but these feckers seem to be everywhere and I don’t know why they are given so much airtime to talk as if they are an authority on anything.
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
The Tories have pumped money into homelessness this last two years, especially in Manchester, Birmingham and Merseyside. Most people I talk to expect this November’s rough sleeper count to fail on last year. Will be interesting (if it happens) to see if this pops up in the campaign narrative.
It's definitely got better in the last 12 months. I walk several miles across town every day, and it's particularly improved in areas away from Piccadilly Gardens. The middle is still bad, but at least there I'm seeing far fewer spice zombies.

However, I wouldn't credit the Government too much. The Mayor has had a much bigger influence on the state of affairs, as far as I can see.
 

EwanI Ted

Full Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2018
Messages
1,755
It's definitely got better in the last 12 months. I walk several miles across town every day, and it's particularly improved in areas away from Piccadilly Gardens. The middle is still bad, but at least there I'm seeing far fewer spice zombies.

However, I wouldn't credit the Government too much. The Mayor has had a much bigger influence on the state of affairs, as far as I can see.
It’s definitely central Government funding and a (patchy, sort of a) strategy, though Burnham has belatedly started to make a difference on his own terms after a bad start.
 

T00lsh3d

T00ly O' Sh3d
Joined
Mar 20, 2014
Messages
8,769
The fear with the ‘tax the rich’ methodology is that the über-rich, the ones that are meant to be targeted, will just avoid it anyway. The effect being that it will hit the level below them, the wealthy but wealthy through hard-work, entrepreneurialism, outstanding talent etc etc
That’s the turnoff with the whole idea. It’s a bit like upping CTX across the board. The huge corps will just move their tax bases, and the net effect is that SMEs without an international group structure will end up being the ones effected.
Most people that are against these measures don’t want to see children starving, people trapped in poverty, etc etc at least I doubt they do. They’re just skeptical that they will have the desired effect
 
Last edited:

Ultimate Grib

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2016
Messages
2,124
Location
Static
Supports
LA Galaxy
The fear with the ‘tax the rich’ methodology is that the über-rich, the ones that are meant to be targeted, will just avoid it anyway. The effect being that it will hit the level below them, the wealthy but wealthy through hard-work, entrepreneurialism, outstanding talent etc etc
That’s the turnoff with the whole idea. It’s a big like upping CTX across the board. The huge corps will just move their tax bases, and the net effect is that SMEs without an international group structure will end up being the ones effected.
Most people that are against these measures don’t want to see children starving, people trapped in poverty, etc etc at least I doubt they do. They’re just skeptical that they will have the desired effect

Well we can’t just not try something just because there’s a possibility it might not work. This country creates billions upon billions of pounds worth of wealth and it’s about time it got its dividend.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,721
Easy way to mitigate the aspiration problem being quoted, put that funding towards tuition bursaries or fees so the lower classes can be encouraged to be more aspirational.

Put it towards SME loans and lending to green energy businesses.
 

Ekkie Thump

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2013
Messages
3,902
Supports
Leeds United
Easy way to mitigate the aspiration problem being quoted, put that funding towards tuition bursaries or fees so the lower classes can be encouraged to be more aspirational.

Put it towards SME loans and lending to green energy businesses.
As far as I can work out Labour's current tax plans would mean a person earning Sun Tzu's 104k per year would pay an extra 1200 quid, or + 1.6%. A massive aspirational dampner to be sure.

Maybe I've got the wrong figures.


Edit: I think maybe the inheritance stuff might be more important to some
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
Interesting how people on this forum are so pro Labour according to the poll.
 

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
We're people who aspire to not starving.
Haha, yeah. General polling would show this forum is massively over represented by Labour supports and Conservative supporters are under represented, I wonder why that is? I imagine an age profile thing.
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,721
Interesting how people on this forum are so pro Labour according to the poll.
It is more than i expected especially as i went undecided and i blather on about Labour.

Still you know northerners should be voting Labour. Only southerners should really be considering Lib Dem
 

Wibble

In Gadus Speramus
Staff
Joined
Jun 15, 2000
Messages
89,777
Location
Centreback
Q: How will you vote in the next Brexit referendum?

Corbyn says Brexit has divided people, communities and families. He says there are people who voted leave and remain who experience the same problems.

He says Labour wants to take no deal off the table. That is why he refused to support any move that might allow Boris Johnson do to this.

He says a Labour government would open negotiations with the EU about a sensible relationship with the EU, that would not destroy jobs. There would be a customs union, which would keep the border in Ireland as it is now. And the Good Friday agreement would be intake (intact?). And a sweetheart trade deal with Donald Trump would not be an option.

You can see why remainers should (not) vote for Jeremy . Still doesn't understand you can't take no deal off the table, still doesn't understand customs' unions and still doesn't understand it's not only the CU that is needed re NI/Ire.
I'm sure he understands but is selling Labour as willing to Brexit but only on terms that won't destroy our economy or the GFA. Lets face it nuanced detail doesn't seem to matter much any more.
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,672
Location
Glasgow
Haha, yeah. General polling would show this forum is massively over represented by Labour supports and Conservative supporters are under represented, I wonder why that is? I imagine an age profile thing.
I can think of many other reasons. What age profile do you think the general forum has?
 

Fingeredmouse

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2014
Messages
5,672
Location
Glasgow
What are the reasons you think?
I think that this forum is primarily Northern UK, Celtic or metropolitan and that those demographics tend to be more to the left, amongst other reasons. This doesn't surprise me.
I suspect a West Ham forum to overly represent the Tories and their less disguised allies for similar reasons.

To expand, although the globalisation of the PL dilutes this, especially in the football forum, UTDs core fanbase UK (and Eire) fanbase is broadly left leaning.
 
Last edited:

Fiskey

Can't stop thinking about David Nugent's hot naked
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
4,667
Location
Oxford
I think that this forum is primarily Northern UK, Celtic or metropolitan and that those demographics tend to be more to the left, amongst other reasons. This doesn't surprise me.
I suspect a West Ham forum to overly represent the Tories and their less disguised allies for similar reasons.

To expand, although the globalisation of the PL dilutes this, especially in the football forum, UTDs core fanbase UK (and Eire) fanbase is broadly left leaning.
Yeah, definitely a good point. I wonder if Fergie supports this iteration of the Labour Party like he did in the Blair/Brown years.
 

TheGame

Full Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2002
Messages
19,944
Location
In the Land of Saints and Sinners
I’ve had to block Darren Grimes and Tom Harwood on Twitter. I’m all for different opinions but these feckers seem to be everywhere and I don’t know why they are given so much airtime to talk as if they are an authority on anything.
They are both despicable individuals masquerading as political experts. Some of the comments they come out with are laughable yet as you say it’s ridiculous how they are given any air time at all.
 

Volumiza

The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
13,736
Location
Somewhere in the middle
Edit: I think maybe the inheritance stuff might be more important to some
well edited. I’m not against paying a slightly increased tax rate but the proposed IHT levels (or lifetime gifts bullshit) are too low and will hit some people who aren’t wealthy in monetary terms.

And there’s no party that can convince me that I shouldn’t want to pass what I’ve worked for on to my children without them being hit with a massive tax bill.
 
Last edited:

Cockney Phil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2018
Messages
587
Location
London
Corbyn threw a surprise when he set out the Labour agenda today. Finally buried the curse of Blair and cheap Toryism.
Defending the NHS, saving the people and protecting Britain - old style 50s Socialism delivered in 21st century rhetoric.
This might just turn into a very interesting election.
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,670
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
Corbyn threw a surprise when he set out the Labour agenda today. Finally buried the curse of Blair and cheap Toryism.
Defending the NHS, saving the people and protecting Britain - old style 50s Socialism delivered in 21st century rhetoric.
This might just turn into a very interesting election.
From what?
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,670
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
I think that this forum is primarily Northern UK, Celtic or metropolitan and that those demographics tend to be more to the left, amongst other reasons. This doesn't surprise me.
I suspect a West Ham forum to overly represent the Tories and their less disguised allies for similar reasons.

To expand, although the globalisation of the PL dilutes this, especially in the football forum, UTDs core fanbase UK (and Eire) fanbase is broadly left leaning.
West Ham has a 36k+ Labour majority.
 

NWRed

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2019
Messages
1,196
Corbyn threw a surprise when he set out the Labour agenda today. Finally buried the curse of Blair and cheap Toryism.
Defending the NHS, saving the people and protecting Britain - old style 50s Socialism delivered in 21st century rhetoric.
This might just turn into a very interesting election.
Yep, the curse of being in government and expanding the welfare state.
 

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
Corbyn threw a surprise when he set out the Labour agenda today. Finally buried the curse of Blair and cheap Toryism.
Defending the NHS, saving the people and protecting Britain - old style 50s Socialism delivered in 21st century rhetoric.
This might just turn into a very interesting election.
The curse of 3 wins with comfortable majorities... Yup burried
 

Volumiza

The alright "V", B-Boy cypher cat
Joined
Jul 13, 2018
Messages
13,736
Location
Somewhere in the middle
Corbyn threw a surprise when he set out the Labour agenda today. Finally buried the curse of Blair and cheap Toryism.
Defending the NHS, saving the people and protecting Britain - old style 50s Socialism delivered in 21st century rhetoric.
This might just turn into a very interesting election.
There were no surprises from JC. Exactly what was expected.

The curse of Tony Blair? You mean the curse of actually being electable? The last time Labour were actually electable?

Old style 50’s socialism ... brill!
 

Jippy

Sleeps with tramps, bangs jacuzzis, dirty shoes
Staff
Joined
Nov 19, 2009
Messages
57,670
Location
Jet fuel doesn't melt steel beams
The team is not the area. I'd be surprised if a West Ham forum polled like the Caf. I may be wrong.
The team isn't the area, but most of East London is a Labour shithole. They might have a few more vocal Brexit Party types, although we'll defo have a good few shy ones lurking in the shadows.
 

Sweet Square

ˈkämyənəst
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
24,203
Location
The Zone
There were no surprises from JC. Exactly what was expected.

The curse of Tony Blair? You mean the curse of actually being electable? The last time Labour were actually electable?

Old style 50’s socialism ... brill!
Yep, the curse of being in government and expanding the welfare state.
Instead they now celebrate losing but not too badly. And that’s their peak.

Progress.
I see the Blair cultists have been angered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.