kouroux
45k posts to finally achieve this tagline
He can do what Makelele did and has also more tools indeed.Comfortably for me. Different type of midfielder but even more influential.
He can do what Makelele did and has also more tools indeed.Comfortably for me. Different type of midfielder but even more influential.
The younger version of Makélélé was like Kanté, people tend to remember the late 20s and beyond 30 version. Chelsea only saw the older version but Makélélé was initially a wide player, then a defensive box to box for Nantes/Vigo and then he became a figurative wall infront of defenses.Such a different player to watch than Makas was, for me (maybe my bad memory).
I don't remember Maka charging forward and going for far post headers like Kante did last night. Or joining in with attacking breaks regularly.
Maka was an incredibly reliable barrier in our defensive midfield but he never, ever did things like this...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I don't know about Balon d'Or because I don't watch much football outside the Prem but would be awesome to see a "defensive" player get one for once.
The group that played for Spain and Madrid/Barca between 2008 & 2012.CL, EL, PL and WC. Would be insane if he adds the Euros this summer — has anyone ever done that?
Pretty much. His abilities suit a midfield 2.I can remember listening to a few ‘expert’ journalists saying Kanté was a huge problem for Lampard. The only issue is that Lampard wasn’t playing him in his correct position. Tuchel has corrected that and ever since Chelsea have looked so much better.
Maybe Makalele is the better as a pure CDM, while Kante who is a Box to Box type of CM is better in contribution to the attacking of the team, both are very different players.Is he already better than Makelele?
Pedro did.The group that played for Spain and Madrid/Barca between 2008 & 2012.
they didn't win EL as they only played in UCL.
Cassillas, Ramos, Poyol, Pique, Xavi, Iniesta, Xabi Alonso, and D.Villa
i remember Makelele when he played for RM, he used to execute a lot those accurate penetrative through passes from deep, he also had the close control and skill to beat the press, but as you said, he became a wall in front of the defense, reading the game and breaking up play, he was so good at that.Makélélé was initially a wide player, then a defensive box to box for Nantes/Vigo and then he became a figurative wall infront of defenses.
Yes, i missed out Pedro, so you are right as well as the question includes PL, the ones i mentioned didnt win PL, Pedro not only won PL, he also won EL, very impressive haul.Pedro did.
Iirc scored in every final in club footballYes, i missed out Pedro, so you are right as well as the question includes PL, the ones i mentioned didnt win PL, Pedro not only won PL, he also won EL, very impressive haul.
he didn't score in WC 2010, Ineista did.Iirc scored in every final in club football
Ie all the cups in Spain the cwc the supercup the cl final the europa final
The Bayern core of the 72-74 German NT did (CWC, not EL of course). The Euros were just a smaller KO tournament back then, though. But the EC hattrick kind of makes up for it.CL, EL, PL and WC. Would be insane if he adds the Euros this summer — has anyone ever done that?
A true world class player delivers consistently in both big games and other games, period.Big games are what makes people's opinion change.And you know what, i believe Football it's about winning big games, especially when playing for a big team like Chelsea, period.
For instance, Kane playing for England can score all he wants against tier 3 NTs like Scotland,Slovakia,Slovenia, Ireland,Tunez,Panama,etc but then if he does nothing in big games against Croatia,Belgium,France,Netherlands,Italy,Germany,etc no one will care about his records against San Marino, Lithuania, Scotland,Panama,etc...(BTW he even choked against Iceland in the Euro 2016 knockout).
I'd take a 'big game player' over a consistent player who delivers everywhere except in big games.You need the former to actually win trophies.
Massive role. He was France's top scorer, but missed the final.Did Henry play a prominent role in '98?
true world class player can not deliver every time either. If two ‘true world class’ player play against each other, only 1 can win, despite the losing team having that true world class player.A true world class player delivers consistently in both big games and other games, period.
Nobody is going to bump this thread after he puts in a great performance against Sheffield United because nobody cares.It’s expected that the best players put in performances against these sides. The expectation is less in big semi-final / final matches because you have more pressure and you’re playing against high quality opposition. It’s pretty simple.A true world class player delivers consistently in both big games and other games, period.
All your examples prove for me that big games do not necessarily mean everything. A player can be world class if he can deliver consistently, despite losing in big games. Vice versa, a player should not be considered as world class if he only performs in big games, while struggling in other games. Kante is the latter.true world class player can not deliver every time either. If two ‘true world class’ player play against each other, only 1 can win, despite the losing team having that true world class player.
zidane head butt,
United 2 losing finals to Barcelona
Robben with that gigantic misser at the World Cup final
France losing to Portugal in 2016, having the superior team.
Gotze winning Germany the World Cup despite Argentinia having the legendary Messi.
Ibrahimovic never winning a CL.
football is a team sport as well, world class individual player(s) can make a difference (which historically they have done), but a organized team with an ‘inferior’ team can defeat a team with a superior team (which historically has happened also frequently).It all depends on the form on the day (and luck) during the most important moments.
Or because he never puts in a great performance against smaller sides.Nobody is going to bump this thread after he puts in a great performance against Sheffield United because nobody cares.It’s expected that the best players put in performances against these sides. The expectation is less in big semi-final / final matches because you have more pressure and you’re playing against high quality opposition. It’s pretty simple.
He didn't had a massive role and he was a substitute for every games after Paraguay, the only game where he was key was the second game against Saudi Arabia. Now he played his part but there was nothing massive about it and in general none of the attacking players had a massive role, the team was all about defense.Massive role. He was France's top scorer, but missed the final.
A defensive midfielder like Kante is rarely going to stand out against smaller sides when Chelsea have 65% possession and look to dominate the game...but what is noticeable is Chelsea are much worse without him. They lost to Villa and West Brom in the run-in when he was missing and drew with Brighton.Or because he never puts in a great performance against smaller sides.
I'm done repeating myself. Please just refer to the OP.A defensive midfielder like Kante is rarely going to stand out against smaller sides when Chelsea have 65% possession and look to dominate the game...but what is noticeable is Chelsea are much worse without him. They lost to Villa and West Brom in the run-in when he was missing and drew with Brighton.
You caught him on a bad run of form, amid a good spell of 7 years of football. The no good against the small sides argument doesn't hold up for me.I'm done repeating myself. Please just refer to the OP.
Germany had a superior team, I'd take Neuer,Lahm,Kroos,Schweinsteiger, Muller, and Hummels over what Argentina had in the same positions.true world class player can not deliver every time either. If two ‘true world class’ player play against each other, only 1 can win, despite the losing team having that true world class player.
Gotze winning Germany the World Cup despite Argentinia having the legendary Messi.
football is a team sport as well, world class individual player(s) can make a difference (which historically they have done), but a organized team with an ‘inferior’ team can defeat a team with a superior team (which historically has happened also frequently).It all depends on the form on the day (and luck) during the most important moments.
Exactly. Makelele was a hall of fame player. Just like Kante. No need to diminish either in comparison.The younger version of Makélélé was like Kanté, people tend to remember the late 20s and beyond 30 version. Chelsea only saw the older version but Makélélé was initially a wide player, then a defensive box to box for Nantes/Vigo and then he became a figurative wall infront of defenses.
Vieira was great when he broke up play, but he was a bit underrated when he roamed forward like Kante.Nah, not really. Makelele was very similar for most of his career. I'd say in terms of ability the two are more or less the same. Kanté's edges it for achievements. Btw i'd say the same wrt Vieira(who was a different player indeed)
I don’t disagree that Germany had the better players. The point was that you can have teams with world class players, but even a team with (a) world class player(s), can lose to a superior team. Likewise an ‘inferior’ team can win against an superior team. This was in regards to a comment saying that true word class players will always make a difference... unless your playing against even more world class players on the opponent’s side.Germany had a superior team, I'd take Neuer,Lahm,Kroos,Schweinsteiger, Muller, and Hummels over what Argentina had in the same positions.
The only superior player Argentina had was Messi and Higuaín (who chokes on finals and knockout matches), that's 2 vs 7-8 better german players in their respective positions.
The team with better players won.
Yes you’re right, another stupid caf threadWasn't the cafe saying Herrera was better than him
I agree that big games do not necessarily define a player, but they do as well. Messi is the greatest if not one of the all time greats and he never managed to win a World Cup, except for a final against Germany. Ronaldo (cr7) likewise and many more other players.All your examples prove for me that big games do not necessarily mean everything. A player can be world class if he can deliver consistently, despite losing in big games. Vice versa, a player should not be considered as world class if he only performs in big games, while struggling in other games. Kante is the latter.
This is interesting. I think this is the case with a lot of players who end up in the prem towards the latter stages of their career. Especially during the times when other leagues, especially outside of the top clubs, weren’t as accessible as they are now. We see when they’re usually a little more static, and less dynamic than their younger counterpart may have been, and miss out on the evolution of the player.The younger version of Makélélé was like Kanté, people tend to remember the late 20s and beyond 30 version. Chelsea only saw the older version but Makélélé was initially a wide player, then a defensive box to box for Nantes/Vigo and then he became a figurative wall infront of defenses.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date