Tiber
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2014
- Messages
- 10,278
Sounds about rightI can see Iglaho getting 8/9 goals for us during his loan spell and earning himself a contract and scoring 2 goals in total next season.
What does that even mean actual no9? How Martial is not that? He is quick, has lethal finishing and excellent technique. What else he needs?He's not particularly good, but he is an actual #9.
I know sewer workers in London who nickname the bigger fatbergs “a lukuku”Come on, we all know Lukaku isn't fat.
Im not being funny but I feel like that’s the sort of thing you know the answer to if you follow football.What does that even mean actual no9? How Martial is not that? He is quick, has lethal finishing and excellent technique. What else he needs?
In relation to this thread. He should start ahead of Ighalo. Should we get a better no9 if we can in the summer? Yeshe’s not a no. 9 though. Surely we all know that Martial as our first choice striker is not going to be good enough to consistently win trophies.
his best position is where Rashford plays.
he’s not Dong, and he’s a good player. A top class striker would benefit the team far more than just the goals scored.
to head the ball, hold it up, occupy centre backs, bring in midfielders, score the ugly goals etc etc.What does that even mean actual no9? How Martial is not that? He is quick, has lethal finishing and excellent technique. What else he needs?
Positioning. Martial is never central and it’s a hindrance when we attack.What does that even mean actual no9? How Martial is not that? He is quick, has lethal finishing and excellent technique. What else he needs?
I’d start Ighalo and have Martial on the left whilst Rashford is out. When Rashford is back, I would then go with Rashford on the left and Martial as striker, and Ighalo as back up. We can definitely improve on Martial in the long term.In relation to this thread. He should start ahead of Ighalo. Should we get a better no9 if we can in the summer? Yes
Hahahahahahahah, no. Don't be ridiculous.You play Ighalo and bench Martial? Hahahahahaha
Sense for positioning and movementWhat does that even mean actual no9? How Martial is not that? He is quick, has lethal finishing and excellent technique. What else he needs?
He's static, he doesn't get into poaching positions, he doesn't have a striker's instinct in the box and he's often flat footed too.What does that even mean actual no9? How Martial is not that? He is quick, has lethal finishing and excellent technique. What else he needs?
this is exactly how I feelIm not being funny but I feel like that’s the sort of thing you know the answer to if you follow football.
The thread wasn't made to discuss whether they were on the same level as players.Stupid thread
I like Ighalo but they are not on the same level
I agree that he needs to work about positioning. 100%. But his movement and even hold up play are not that bad like some people here say. There is no striker in the world who has all striker traits on maximum.Sense for positioning and movement
Martial has a lot of skill and is a great wide attacker or inside forward but he's a poor number9/poacher. It's not a coincidence that Ighalo gets those sitter chances.I agree that he needs to work about positioning. 100%. But his movement and even hold up play are not that bad like some people here say. There is no striker in the world who has all striker traits on maximum.
Yep, oh how our standards had apparently fallen by signing him.And some were bemoaning the signing of him. Way better to make moves in the transfer window to strengthen a problem position than just ignore it (see: Spurs on a four game losing run and Mourinho saying that Levy has to make a choice whether he wants Mourinho to focus on the league game against Burnley or the CL game against Leipzig and not both).
It's incredible but I actually think I haven't seen him attempt a single stepover..He knows his limits which is refreshing, keeps it simple.
I made this thread and I was one of the people bemoaning the signing of him. I just feel his natural position makes him look more suitable up top, and he's looking sharper as the minutes go by.And some were bemoaning the signing of him. Way better to make moves in the transfer window to strengthen a problem position than just ignore it (see: Spurs on a four game losing run and Mourinho saying that Levy has to make a choice whether he wants Mourinho to focus on the league game against Burnley or the CL game against Leipzig and not both).
So, are you saying that if he does well on his loan we should just give him the boot... cut him off?I can see Iglaho getting 8/9 goals for us during his loan spell and earning himself a contract and scoring 2 goals in total next season.
Something else comes to mind - like how many people got into football / man utd because of games like FIFA and how in that, pace, skill and finishing is literally everythingIm not being funny but I feel like that’s the sort of thing you know the answer to if you follow football.
Did you feel the same about Solskjaer?So, are you saying that if he does well on his loan we should just give him the boot... cut him off?
Personally, I never wanted Solskjaer as manager, so I wouldn't mind if he got the boot too.Did you feel the same about Solskjaer?