arnie_ni
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2014
- Messages
- 15,299
Just seen it on the replay and deleted the post. Look a certain dive live. But It's either a pen or a yellow for diving if the ref thinks there's no contact.He got kneed by the goalie
Just seen it on the replay and deleted the post. Look a certain dive live. But It's either a pen or a yellow for diving if the ref thinks there's no contact.He got kneed by the goalie
Plus, KWP's actually led to a (hopefully temporary) injury.Another one where KWP wins the ball but takes out the player recklessly at the same time and nothing is given.
Yeah I said on the match thread in the first half, slide tackles always endanger an opponent. The reason for the red is that those studs into the shins always look the worse; in reality you might see one of those cause serious injury per season. .Another one where KWP wins the ball but takes out the player recklessly at the same time and nothing is given.
Exactly. Book him if you’re not giving anything.Just seen it on the replay and deleted the post. Look a certain dive live. But It's either a pen or a yellow for diving if the ref thinks there's no contact.
Couldn't agree more. They don't run replays in slow motion in the NFL for this exact reason.VAR should not be looked at in slow motion. Have you ever watched the boxing and seen someone get twatted slow motion? It looks like they've been hit by a train yet full speed it just looks a normal hit.
It's simple. The refs go out of their way to be as harsh on United as the rules allow them to be, because otherwise there's an outrage campaign in the media. Anything a United player does is scrutinized to see if it's possible to punish them for it. If the ref gives United anything, they become the target of insane amounts of doubt and criticism by the largely Liverpool-led football media.I find it really frustrating and inexplicable when challenges like Casemiro are a red when others which are clearly more dangerous receive no punishment. He didn’t go in above the ball and didn’t go through the player to get it. If that’s deemed too dangerous then fine but apply the rule consistently.
That boiled my blood. It was like he’d love to have given 3 minutes but knew that was too far so added a minute.4 minutes added time had me climbing the walls.
Garnacho down for quite some time and there was 5 breaks for substitutions.
The math doesn't add up it's as simple as that.
Especially considering the Fabinho red cards he’s avoided for much worseIt's so infuriating to see so many inconsistent decisions time and again. First the Cas sending off versus Palace for holding a player's neck, a week later, Pool-Everton players go at it, nothing. Today, yes, Cas did lunge in but he won the ball and it's momentum of that that carries his foot into the Southampton player. Yellow was fair, VAR thinks nope.
Absolutely garbage level of consistency.
Fabinho, saka, Leicester yesterday. You could make a list of 30-40 easily and do the same for softer penalties given than the handball today.Fabinho got away with worse last month.
Should have been a pen for the handball.
Actually both were good tackles but obviously one set of rules for..Wait. Wait. Wait. Walkers-Peters follows through but thats not a card/foul?! Utter bullshit.
Great tackle. His studs are facing downward toward the ball.This is why it's a red, you can't fly in with with a stretched leg and studs showing like this even if you get the ball.
Especially considering how silly his first red card was.4 match ban is excessive. The sport has become so soft. Team is already punished having to play a man down. Maybe suspend for the next match. No need for a multiple match ban for a tackle. Ridiculous.