mu4c_20le
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2013
- Messages
- 43,965
He's the Adriano of centrebacks
*1 season.Really weird career trajectory. He was world class for 3 years and then his rapid decline started.
Such a short stint in his "prime".
Its a one match ban obviously. That’s the rule.Hopefully they appeal it and win so they have to play him for the next 3 games. Every time i watch them he's costing them goals.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Spoke too soonIts a one match ban obviously. That’s the rule.
You could clearly lip read what he said. TV cameras picked it up. Hope they increase the suspensionTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They've actually come down on one of the cnuts. Expect Klopp to have a moan at his next press conference
What did he sayYou could clearly lip read what he said. TV cameras picked it up. Hope they increase the suspension
I had a look on RAWK and their opinion on what he said/did is that they always get victimised and punished by the FA, which funnily enough you couldn't make up, because they have been getting away with all sorts for years.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
They've actually come down on one of the cnuts. Expect Klopp to have a moan at his next press conference
I can't recall exactly, from memory I think he called the ref a "F**King Disgrace" or something along those lines.What did he say
Told him to go feck himselfI can't recall exactly, from memory I think he called the ref a "F**King Disgrace" or something along those lines.
If you had the replay from when VAR check completed, he was asked to leave the field and could be clearly seen verbally abusing the referee
That’s the rule for the red card offence he committed (and it would be ‘obvious‘ if that were all he’d done) but he refused to leave the pitch when sent off, which is a separate offence that should add to the length of the ban, and he stood for a prolonged period screaming abuse in the referees face on live TV, which is another offence that should add to the length of the ban.Its a one match ban obviously. That’s the rule.
Is it not a three match ban for a straight red or am I mistaken?That’s the rule for the red card offence he committed (and it would be ‘obvious‘ if that were all he’d done) but he refused to leave the pitch when sent off, which is a separate offence that should add to the length of the ban, and he stood for a prolonged period screaming abuse in the referees face on live TV, which is another offence that should add to the length of the ban.
He also hurled abuse at the 4th official as he left the pitch, which if judged separately from the effing he gave the referee should also add to the length of the ban.
I hope that they follow the rules, tot up the offences, and ban him for 4 games and I recon he’ll be very lucky to get anything less than a 3 game ban.
That’s for violent conduct, I think. This is denial of a goal scoring opportunity, which is just a one-match ban.Is it not a three match ban for a straight red or am I mistaken?
Ah, I see,That’s for violent conduct, I think. This is denial of a goal scoring opportunity, which is just a one-match ban.
‘I don beleef it’What did he say
"Don't you know who I am??"What did he say
He said,What did he say
iirc it’s 1 for being the last man and fouling a player heading towards goal or for abusing the officials or for refusing to leave the pitch, 3 for a straight red for violent conduct, 6 for a red for spitting.Is it not a three match ban for a straight red or am I mistaken?
His competition in Liverpool are Gomez and Matip. Can't decide which is better - VVD getting a ban or not getting a ban?I’d prefer him not to get a ban. Man’s been trading on past reputation for a good 18 months and shat himself whenever anybody actually ran at him.
I think he just got a fine for that one. Which is fine, he's shite now so it's better if he's on the pitch.Any update on a further ban for mouthing off yet?
There’s been no official word on it though has there?I think he just got a fine for that one. Which is fine, he's shite now so it's better if he's on the pitch.
Well, I'm asking you, you posted this!There’s been no official word on it though has there?
I saw “set to be handed an extra game” somewhere and thought that sounded very low considering they are trying to enforce respect to the referee this season with yellows instantly handed for talking back.
You’d think standing there refusing to leave the field, while swearing at the referee and then giving the fourth official a mouthful on your way off the pitch and having to be ushered away by your manager might be made an example of even if it is Liverpool.
But yeah of course I agree on principle, his behaviour was disgraceful.The FA choose to uphold the one match suspension and will add an additional £60k fine to the charge.
Oh haha sorry that was my cynical predictionWell, I'm asking you, you posted this!
But yeah of course I agree on principle, his behaviour was disgraceful.
Ohhhh I thought it was you reporting some newsOh haha sorry that was my cynical prediction
If you don't actually defend, you don't have a chance of getting dribbled past.Was just watching highlights of some weekend games and there was a situation at the end of the Liverpool game where a Luton player was attacking the left hand side of Liverpool box.
VvD did his usual thing of defending from 5 yards away. Luton player ran past him easily and put a cross in.
Not sure how that doesn’t count as being dribbled past.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date