VanGaalEra
Full Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2014
- Messages
- 13,270
What are your sales likely to be?Bascombe said a while back that lfc had a kitty of 200mil but wasn't clear if that was gross or net. Time will tell I guess.
What are your sales likely to be?Bascombe said a while back that lfc had a kitty of 200mil but wasn't clear if that was gross or net. Time will tell I guess.
Hard tackler, fast, fantastic on the ball, knows when to take a risk, can pick out a pass and he's dominant in the air. Not the same but he's the most similar player in the league right now that i can think off.What? He's nothing like Rio.
Anyway, I'm delighted to see them blow most their budget on VVD and Salah.
Studge 25milWhat are your sales likely to be?
Because I'm not convinced they'll splash out that much more, and there are other holes in their team they need to address.Hard tackler, fast, fantastic on the ball, knows when to take a risk, can pick out a pass and he's dominant in the air. Not the same but he's the most similar player in the league right now that i can think off.
Why would you be happy to see Liverpool add 2 quality players to their squad? the prices are irrelevant if the owners have decided to relax their fists a bit.
So you'll need two forwards as well if Sturridge and Origi leave.Studge 25mil
Moreno 5mil
Stewart 10mil
Lucas free
Origi. 20mil possibly
Yeah Origi will only go if Klopp thinks salanke can step up. There is talk of lacazette for 50milSo you'll need two forwards as well if Sturridge and Origi leave.
They think he's shit for the most part. Think they're a little surprised lfc are paying that much. Bit like the cafe tbhHow is bluemoon receiving the news?
Really that long, usually isn't it at the most 5 years?Van Djik is quality. The same people were laughing at Mane last year. Hes 24 and already one of the best in the league. The 50m spread over 7-8 years will look like a great investment if he lives up to his potential.
Might as well just get used to the fact that any price is going to be "crazy" from now on.Crazy price.
Is Jeremy Corbyn reliable when it comes to transfers?Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Graeme Kelly saying its a lot less.
Bascombe said a while back that lfc had a kitty of 200mil but wasn't clear if that was gross or net. Time will tell I guess.
Good for them then, that's a lot of money.Do you really think we'd spend £100m on Salah and Van Dijk if that's the only money we have available? That would be fecking ridiculous.
I know FSG hasn't always been reliable in the past but all the signs point to a figure closer to £200m.
Well for a player of that quality it is. If they were signing a world beater, sure why notMight as well just get used to the fact that any price is going to be "crazy" from now on.
You guys spent £61m last summer (recouped more than that in sales last year), I reckon you have an addition 90m (60m extra from the new TV deal, and 30m guaranteed from CL group stages). Though I don't know where else you need to balance the books tbf.Do you really think we'd spend £100m on Salah and Van Dijk if that's the only money we have available? That would be fecking ridiculous.
I know FSG hasn't always been reliable in the past but all the signs point to a figure closer to £200m.
Because we must be turning into f*cking good negotiators.Why would any club include an add on payment that required a Premier league win from Liverpool of all clubs?
27 years and counting YSB
Not entirely true! I would say the news has been largely received with a gallic shrug and a little shake of the head. Centre halfs are less of a priority for City than full-backs. I'm not convinced that VvD is significantly better than Otamendi or Stones and definitely not as good as Kompany. I would be fine if City bought no central defenders but would be nervous every time Kompany took the pitch!They think he's shit for the most part. Think they're a little surprised lfc are paying that much. Bit like the cafe tbh
No he's an arsenal fan Graeme does have contacts at pool though.Is Jeremy Corbyn reliable when it comes to transfers?
Stones is dreadful mate, I'd rather have Daly Blind in my defence than him.Not entirely true! I would say the news has been largely received with a gallic shrug and a little shake of the head. Centre halfs are less of a priority for City than full-backs. I'm not convinced that VvD is significantly better than Otamendi or Stones and definitely not as good as Kompany. I would be fine if City bought no central defenders but would be nervous every time Kompany took the pitch!
However, I think this is a great signing for Liverpool.
Yes I agree, I was being a little unfair.Not entirely true! I would say the news has been largely received with a gallic shrug and a little shake of the head. Centre halfs are less of a priority for City than full-backs. I'm not convinced that VvD is significantly better than Otamendi or Stones and definitely not as good as Kompany. I would be fine if City bought no central defenders but would be nervous every time Kompany took the pitch!
However, I think this is a great signing for Liverpool.
That appears to be the theme amongst Liverpool and Man Utd fans. I disagree completely.Stones is dreadful mate, I'd rather have Daly Blind in my defence than him.
Pallister?Anyone got the world record progression for a defender?
David Luiz
Rio
Thuram
Rio
What came before?
How the hell would he know. Hes just a fan expressing what he'd like.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Graeme Kelly saying its a lot less.
Not a chance its spread out that long... Maybe 40 + 4 payments is more realistic. If its the 60 quoted and im guessing it is seeing who lfc outbid. But we'll seeReally that long, usually isn't it at the most 5 years?