Wesley Sneijder

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mozza

It’s Carrick you know
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
23,353
Location
Let Rooney be Rooney
Having Jones covering for Fletcher and Carrick as the holding midfield role, why is that a gamble?

You mentioned the departure of Hargreaves. Is irrellevant, hasn't played for 3 years. O'Shea's departure makes little difference to our midfield, he's hardly played there the last couple of seasons.
He's barely played the position

We are short in midfield, doesn't mean we wont muddle through, doesn't mean we should go into the season planning to though
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,400
Location
La-La-Land
Having Jones covering for Fletcher and Carrick as the holding midfield role, why is that a gamble?

You mentioned the departure of Hargreaves. Is irrellevant, hasn't played for 3 years. O'Shea's departure makes little difference to our midfield, he's hardly played there the last couple of seasons.
Have you seen Jones in midfield? Is he really that good to cover for Carrick or Fletcher and add quality?

All this is based on assumptions and too much of a gamble.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
Well, firstly because he's an inexperienced 19-year-old, secondly because if injuries hit the midfield at the same time Jones is required to help out in the back four (because, let's say, Ferdinand and the twins are injured), we're fecked.

People seem to forget that Jones is basically a centre-back and had one good season with Blackburn bloody Rovers. Hardly the answer to our problems in midfield.
In the unlikely event of having Rio, Vidic, Smalling, Carrick, Fletcher all injured at the same time, we will struggle whatever midfielder we bring in.

Jones is not the answer to anything, just an option.

And I reckong our so-called midfield problems are overstated.
 

Brwned

Have you ever been in love before?
Joined
Apr 18, 2008
Messages
50,855
Jones is a defender, Park a winger. If we lost Carrick and Fletcher at the same time we'd be screwed.

Last season we could cover that loss with Gibson, Scholes and O'shea, all capable of acting as holding players. With what we have now we'd only have Jones.
Yes but then we did pull through surprisingly well with Giggs-O'Shea so...
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,886
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
Having Jones covering for Fletcher and Carrick as the holding midfield role, why is that a gamble?
1. He has little experience and isn't a natural midfielder.
2. With our recent injury record in defence. We will definitely need him to cover the center backs above all else.

You mentioned the departure of Hargreaves. Is irrellevant, hasn't played for 3 years. O'Shea's departure makes little difference to our midfield, he's hardly played there the last couple of seasons.
1. Hargreaves missing was significant that is why we kept trying to bring him back. We got away with it however by having also Gibson and Scholes around. Just last season alone we used O'shea in midfield vs the likes of Everton. We no longer have those options if only Jones is the only one around as cover.

2. We now have 2 injury prone fullbacks and Rio. When Vidic picks up his usual suspension too we could so easily end up like this at the back (Smalling, Evans, Jones, Evra)

That would leave us zero cover in holding midfield if Flecther remained sick and something happened to Carrick.


The fact is our options in midfield have reduced significantly. It makes sense to replenish them with at least one player.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
Have you seen Jones in midfield? Is he really that good to cover for Carrick or Fletcher and add quality?

All this is based on assumptions and too much of a gamble.
Yes, I've seen him in midfield. Totally different to Fletcher and Carrick. Jones won't add anything attacking-wise, purely there to stop the opposition play.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
The only way to give a player experience is to play the player.

We have 5 centrehalves, no probs there.

Scholes and Gibson out, Jones and Cleverly in.

If we are short in a game or two, play a youngster.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
There is no role or position we are short in terms of numbers.

We are lacking an outstanding centre midfielder. But, not many of them around, and even fewer that could be bought for a realistic fee.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,834
There is no role or position we are short in terms of numbers.

We are lacking an outstanding centre midfielder. But, not many of them around, and even fewer that could be bought for a realistic fee.
We do lack central midfielders. We have three of them, four if you count Giggs. Not nearly enough.

Jones, Park etc. are not central midfielders. Yeah, with wingers and centre-backs we're likely to be able to name an 18-man squad for every game but quality is kind of important for a club like Manchester United. People seem to forget that.

Going into the season with the midfield we have now basically means we'll rely on the rivals being shite again. Worked last time but not a comforting thought.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
We do lack central midfielders. We have three of them, four if you count Giggs. Not nearly enough.

Jones, Park etc. are not central midfielders. Yeah, with wingers and centre-backs we're likely to be able to name an 18-man squad for every game but quality is kind of important for a club like Manchester United. People seem to forget that.

Going into the season with the midfield we have now basically means we'll rely on the rivals being shite again. Worked last time but not a comforting thought.
That's rubbish, to be fair.
 

Kelvin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
21,342
That's rubbish, to be fair.
what is it that is rubbish that we lack central midfielder, surely we can't start the season with just carrick anderson and a 37 year old giggs with fletcher being a sicknote. its too huge of a gamble to take. I don't believe all this no value bollocks, its crazy to think we can't afford to buy someone to strengthen our midfield.
 

Dion

Full Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2010
Messages
4,417
Park is not and never has been a central midfielder, he'll do a job chasing the ball further up the pitch but you only have to look at his 12 second cluster-feck of a performance against Arsenal where he didn't bother tracking back at all and allowed Ramsey to score from a chance he wouldn't have gotten if Scholes had been marking him, never mind Keane.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,956
what is it that is rubbish that we lack central midfielder, surely we can't start the season with just carrick anderson and a 37 year old giggs with fletcher being a sicknote. its too huge of a gamble to take. I don't believe all this no value bollocks, its crazy to think we can't afford to buy someone to strengthen our midfield.
We did signed another defender (5th choice?) and another winger though.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
What's Giggs' age got to do with it? People have used that as an argument for 5 years now!

We are NOT going into the new season with just Anderson, Carrick and Giggs.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,834
We won the league and finished second in Europe because we were good, not because the opposition was crap.
We were OK, sometimes good. We amassed 80 points in the league - the last time that was enough for anything better than third place was in 2004.

As for Europe: Bayern, Inter, Milan etc. were all crap last season - I know Milan won their league but failing to score TWICE against Spurs? Really? -, we avoided the Spanish giants so the only really good team we had to beat was an out-of-sorts Chelsea. It was a good run, no doubt, and based on the quality of the entire European season we deserved to be there but other sides might improve for next season - Bayern definitely did, Inter have a new coach, Real Madrid look even stronger, Chelsea have a new manager and look to spend, there's City to worry about in the CL now - so we cannot risk being left behind. We've been steadily getting worse since Moscow and it's high time to buck that trend.
 

robthered

Full Member
Joined
Feb 15, 2006
Messages
2,071
Location
That's Dr. robthered
Bloody hell - doom monger.

At least we improved from that crappy season in 99 when we got even less points and had to put up with scraping past Bayern in the CL final.....
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,834
Bloody hell - doom monger.

At least we improved from that crappy season in 99 when we got even less points and had to put up with scraping past Bayern in the CL final.....
Oh God. That was with a much smaller squad, in a different era. Football has changed tremendously since 1999.

Then again, I know it's a heinous crime to suggest that United are not actually perfect. So let me repent: we are perfect, the Jones-Park midfield will take the Premier League by storm and nobody will stand a chance against us.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,956
Oh God. That was with a much smaller squad, in a different era. Football has changed tremendously since 1999.

Then again, I know it's a heinous crime to suggest that United are not actually perfect. So let me repent: we are perfect, the Jones-Park midfield will take the Premier League by storm and nobody will stand a chance against us.
Park and Jones will probably eat Iniesta-Xavi for breakfast. Believe!;)
 

Maajid

Formerly Mad
Joined
Oct 20, 2006
Messages
7,451
Location
127.0.0.1
Where's this €45M figure coming from? Last time I checked Inter's demands were around the €35M mark?
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
Oh God. That was with a much smaller squad, in a different era. Football has changed tremendously since 1999.

Then again, I know it's a heinous crime to suggest that United are not actually perfect. So let me repent: we are perfect, the Jones-Park midfield will take the Premier League by storm and nobody will stand a chance against us.
There's no such a thing as the perfect football team.

If it is the Jones-Park partnership you are scared of, I doubt you will see that often, if at all.
 

gaz1185

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
3,467
Location
Manchester
Where's this €45M figure coming from? Last time I checked Inter's demands were around the €35M mark?
It was supposed to be Inter wanted £35M, so around €40M. Heard €45M mentioned yesterday, but I think that was just a new figure randomly thrown out there by someone in the press.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,834
Where's this €45M figure coming from? Last time I checked Inter's demands were around the €35M mark?
I don't think anyone knows exactly what Inter want, it's all speculation.

My opinion is that they want a shedload of money which we have no intention of paying, thus the deal died before it had a chance to really live.
 

CnutOfAllCnuts

Bald Boring Cnut
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
29,997
I don't think anyone knows exactly what Inter want, it's all speculation.

My opinion is that they want a shedload of money which we have no intention of paying, thus the deal died before it had a chance to really live.
Good
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,834
There's no such a thing as the perfect football team.

If it is the Jones-Park partnership you are scared of, I doubt you will see that often, if at all.
Yeah but we have to keep striving for perfection. Meek acceptance of mediocrity isn't what Manchester United are about. And right now our central midfield is mediocre at best and we're planning to rely on wingers and centre-backs to pull us through if our virus-hit or injury-prone and inconsistent midfielders fail to do their job.
 

Godfather

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2007
Messages
30,114
Location
Austria
Yes but then we did pull through surprisingly well with Giggs-O'Shea so...
That's the solution! Let's concentrate on buying defenders and wingers and let's convert them into CM! It surely works just as well as it did with Giggs
 

Eyepopper

Lowering the tone since 2006
Joined
Sep 1, 2006
Messages
67,019
Fergie on the prospect of Rooney playing the Scholes role:

Ferguson feels their styles are totally different.

"Scholesy is being very generous there," he said. "He's underestimating himself and the value he had to us. Wayne could play centre-midfield, but not the way that Scholesy played it. They're too different.

"The way Wayne would play as opposed to Scholesy is that he would be more dynamic and all over the place, using his energy to run everywhere, challenge and hit those cross-field passes that he's terrific at.

"Scholes was more calculated. He always had that control about him, controlling the speed and pace of a game, which is pretty difficult to do. He was an absolute one-off.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,834
And anyway, if we move Rooney back to midfield then the problem of replacing a fantastic player will still be there, just in a different position...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.