You'll be telling me next that Pokemon is deeper than a simple game of Rock, Paper, Scissors.
Gaming Wii-U
- Thread starter AVARiCE
- Start date
How have you ended up mixing up the depth of a game with how good it is? Explain to me your thinking behind that?
How can you guarantee you would win if it requires little skill? Surely you would be susceptible to defeat through luck or chance of your opponent.
Because I'm at an age where, simple games are no longer compelling at all, so going along that line, they aren't very good are they? You might as well play Battleship or Draughts.
Because I've played it for 20 years! It's a matter of timing and knowing the tracks. There is very little more to it.
In that case GT5 is the better game for someone in your position, in your opinion. That does not make it the better game, it does not make it a fact.
You have played it a lot for a shallow game.
The fact is that my 6 year old prefers playing it to Mario Kart. Christ!
Yes I have. Do you have a problem with that?
Yes and I pointed that out. Your son prefering it is a fact. That does not make you saying its a better game, a fact. Are you seriously arguing that point with me? I never denied for a second that your son prefering it wasn't a fact. Just go back a few posts, to the post where I've pointed out the difference between the two.
You have played for a game for twenty years that you don't find stimulating or deep. You claim to know all the timings and tracks to pretty much guarantee you win. Where does the replay value come from?
It's fun to play it. Do you have a problem with that?
I never said it was a bad game, I said that it was shallow.It comes from the fact that it's a great game!Isn't that right Weaste?
How can it be fun of there is no challenge or depth though?
What has fun got to do with challenge and depth? Playing with balloons can be fun.
Playing with balloons isn't very deep. It's sort of like playing fetch with your dog!
I'd be worried if you've invested as much time playing with balloons as you do playing Mario Kart
Crikey Weaste, I leave you unsupervised for one night and you start an argument about balloons!You nutjob!
Weaste
I wish I could find something shallow involving no skill, fun to play for twenty years
You nutjob!
Well I know one thing, for such a superior game he won't be playing GT5 for 20 years!
Though he might be considering how long those hacks take to pump out a new one
Though he might be considering how long those hacks take to pump out a new one
You touch your cock don't you, every now and then?
So you says that MarioKart gives you the same hormonal rush than a good wank? High praise from you, mate.
No, I'm saying that it's shallow involving no skill, yet fun to play for twenty years.
Now, a woman on the other hand is deep, involves a lot of skill, and can be fun for twenty years, or not - depends on how good you are at playing her.
Any game thats fun after 20 years is a masterpiece. (Wanking included)
See. Mario Kart = Balloon. GT5 = Woman.
Well GT5 didnt prove its longevity yet. Get back to us in 2030.
Is a balloon shallow though? You can play balloon football, balloon tennis, use it as an example of static electricity and make balloon animals. That is a lot of depth.
How on earth has a wii u threaded ended up being about women?!Is that a fact lambs? Weaste only deals in (non) facts.Well I know one thing, for such a superior game he won't be playing GT5 for 20 years!
Though he might be considering how long those hacks take to pump out a new one
And that's a facht.
When Weaste says woman, he means his PS3. Which he's named Penelope.
You can only imagine what he does with Penelope's Move attachment
I'm suprised it didnt happen earlier.
Don't you mean what Penelope's move attachment does to him?When Weaste says woman, he means his PS3. Which he's named Penelope.
You can only imagine what he does with Penelope's Move attachment
Women don't normally last for 20 years either, thus the divorce rate.
So if GT5 is like a woman, therefore you are saying GT5 is shallow right?