What are you banging on about? You really can't focus can you
Because they've repeatedly said that they won't, so I'm not assuming anything. Do you want me to find quote for you? They've even said the same in regards to VITA.
Sony have said they won't target the casual market?
Because you're all talking a load of shite. Cryengine will run on Wii U because Wii U is capable of running Cryengine, nothing more, nothing less. It has feck all to do with who is the employer of a particular bloke.What are you banging on about? You really can't focus can you
No one is saying it is difficult or only going to be on it because of this guy! It's more that they are in on the ground floor and are being more public with it. Which, knowing how these things work, is probably right.
I honestly don't know why you get involved sometimes, you are going to give yourself a heart attack one of these days!
So the PS move was made for the hardcore market? I doubt it somehow
Correct!
Considering how wrong you keep being of late, that'a rich. You're also swearing a lot which shows you have no handle on things.
Well what the feck is Move then, you giant bellend!
Do you see it bundled in with the PS3? No! Do you see a major marketing push for it? No! It's not their main focus, it's a periphery concern in their minds.
A controller. You won't get it packaged in with PS4. If Move was so important to them, then why do they let Naughty Dog totally ignore its existence? It would probably take around 20 minutes to shoehorn Move support into Uncharted.
It was launched with a massive campaign, the tv and billboard adverts still run over here!
No, it didn't have a massive campaign at all. The money spent on marketing Move was nowhere near what Microsoft spent of marketing Kinect.
Err because typically like them they were two years behind the game and by that point it was nothing new to consumers?
Probably because it was not as succesful as they anticipated. They released it to compete with the Wii and for no other reason. Rest assured they will want the casual market, who wouldn't want a piece of a market worth at least the same as the hardcore part of the market. If money is there to be made then that is Sonys primary motive.
Yeah, you're right again Weaste
Owned (again)Yeah, you're right again Weaste
Right, so you've proved my point. They are not targeting the casual for the first 2 years of the VITA's life. Thanks for that!Yeah, you're right again Weaste
They are going after the core market for the first 2 years of VITA's life. Can you not read?
You don't target casuals with a 250 quid hand-held box. You don't target casuals with a 450 quid console box. The casual demographic is not going to shell out the money, they would rather play 1 quid iOS games.
God bless you Weaste, I do so enjoy our back and forths!
Though I believe I'm 3-0 up now this week alone
That's not what you said though. You specifically said Sony have said they WON'T target the casual market, yet they actually have said they WILL target that market.
You're a cruel cruel man Lambs! Talk about kicking a man when he's down! @Weaste re:the 360 and ps3 already running the cryengine, so? My point was now, Nintendo will be able to directly compete with the other two and they will. The next gen war's going to be very interesting to say the least. Can only be a good thing for us consumers.Yeah, you're right again Weaste
They don't want to target the casual market out of the gate, that was implied, and is correct. They have never gone after that market out of the gate, ever, EyeToy, Move, etc. have always been added later. PS4 will come with nothing more than a Dual Shock controller or its redesigned equivalent.That's not what you said though. You specifically said Sony have said they WON'T target the casual market, yet they actually have said they WILL target that market.
It's really that simple, you are wrong again
Quote the marketing budgets for Kinect and for Move. Go on!You are definitely turning into Comical Ali now.
That was a given though, due to the hardware that's likely in the thing. It's not news is it?
I can't help it!
You've not proven anything at all have you? That's your problem, you really think that you are making a point, but most of the time it's baseless.I can't help it!
Usually I enjoy our little discussions, and sometimes onlookers might even learn a thing or two from them. He knows I respect him and his knowledge of hardware.
But I can't help getting cheeky from time to time. I certainly can't resist making him look a little silly, but sometimes he makes it just too easy! I mean look, he's blatantly been proved wrong, yet is still trying to dig his way out! I suppose you've got to admire his perseverance
It was a bundle pack in the same way as any bundle with LBP on the PS3. Do you really believe Nintendo didn't factor in development costs when deciding on the price of the Wii bundle?
What, you mean other than you are wrong yet again, just like you was about the Unreal engine and any number of other subjects?
Two years ago! How many has it sold since then?
Oh and when did I say it'd sell as many as the PS2? Utter tripe! You can keep saying the same thing over and over until it becomes true, which is what you've been doing for years now.What the hell is this even about? You are insane!
I've not been wrong on a single point, not one. I've been calm, focused, and provided facts. All you've done is provide a lot of smilies.
Then you won't see me ask if the Wii-U will run the Unreal engine!
LOL? You trying to be down with the kid's gramps?
It was:
YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG...YOU'RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG.
To the sound of Big Ben
