Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

dove

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
7,899
Well normally you would go off current form not last season if your coming to a stick or twist decision when he picked up midway through a shitshow but fill ya boots with your negativity pal.
So everyone agrees that he picked up a team in a shitshow. But Ole's supporters just can't see or ignore the fact that we are more of a shitshow now compared to when he took over. Interesting.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
I fear that as well. His disdain towards us would create an environment of a very aggressive game and out team has shown that we can't handle that at all. We will definitely see a few of our players getting flattened, the likes of James and Williams would be the biggest targets.
We are actually quite decent against the top teams.We beat Chelsea twice this season....We beat Leicester and drew with Liverpool,so we are actually quite good on the break when the top teams come at us.I think Jose will sit deep and try to hit us on the break...Jose won’t let his team forward like Chelsea,he will be very pragmatic and it should be an interesting game...
 

Hernandez - BFA

The Way to Fly
Joined
Jan 5, 2011
Messages
17,324
I love Ole, but keeping him as a manager is ridiculous. The way we're going we’re not going to finish anywhere near the top 4 and we look clueless when we play. We have less of a style than what we had with Mourinho.

Sure, he’s allowed the youngsters through which is genuinely brilliant and I love seeing the likes of Greenwood and Williams making waves in the first team. But that doesn’t mean Ole gets an extra few weeks before we sack him. Because let’s be honest, he’s in the plank at the moment - the question is how far along the plank does he need to walk before he gets pushed off.

He isn’t the man who take us back into the top 4 and back into the champions league.

Poch is available and the previous reason for not going for him “because we’d have to pay millions and millions in compensation to Spurs for letting him go” is no longer valid.

Ole needs to go.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
So no other competition matters now, then?
If we finish 10th and win a domestic cup do you think Ole is keeping his job ? Van Gaal didn't so I see no reason as to why Ole should.

The only viable competition that will give Ole any merit despite a disastrous league campaign would be a Europa League win.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
So everyone agrees that he picked up a team in a shitshow. But Ole's supporters just can't see or ignore the fact that we are more of a shitshow now compared to when he took over. Interesting.
Or maybe they don't agree with that statement.

I'd rather see the likes of McTominay, AWB, Williams, James, Rashford(in his proper position), Martial(in his proper position), Greenwood & Tuanzabe all putting in inconsistent performances but developing than watching what we watched last year with awful games and awful players with no hope to boot.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,309
Location
Tool shed
Christ you argue with me about form since Liverpool so it either does or it doesn’t count?
What the actual feck are you on about?

I listed stats about this season.
You said it's not fair to list stats about last season.
I pointed out that it was about this season, not last season.
You then go on about the last 7 games.
I pointed out that 7 games is not the full season.
You say I'm claiming that our last 7 games don't count even though my stats include our last 7 games.

Are you high?
 

Vault Dweller

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
6,696
Location
Vault 88, The Commonwealth
If we finish 10th and win a domestic cup do you think Ole is keeping his job ? Van Gaal didn't so I see no reason as to why Ole should.

The only viable competition that will give Ole any merit despite a disastrous league campaign would be a Europa League win.
I don't think he will keep his job regardless. That being said, the poster I replied to cited the Premier League stats and told another poster to stop dressing up stats. That indicates that the only competition worth mentioning is the league. If that's the case, why bother competing for anything else at all then?
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,706
Moyes got 7th and both LvG and Jose got 5th in one of their seasons in charge, considering we are 2 points off 5th, thats not a crisis is it? The difference is that Ole is putting out very young starting XI's and is the first one since Fergie who actually seems to think about the future and just not the here and now.

The last 7 games we have won 5 and drawn 2, one against the reigning European Champions and now after being 0-2 down away from home. That's progress, and that is with our best player injured the entire time and yet another CM out yesterday. No matter who is in charge, the fact is this squad is paper thin and is always just one or two injuries away from a massive drop in quality.

We were in the position that we needed to get rid of a lot of players (5-7 at least), but also needed to get in new ones and that cant be done in one window. Considering we lost two CM's and a CF and have yet to replace them cant only be blamed on Ole. The squad is in dire need of investment and any PL team and any manager would struggle if they had to play Jones, Pereria and Fred in midfield. Pereira and Jones are getting scores of 1-3/10 in most papers today and rightly so. They are fecking terrible and the fact that we have to resort to players like these says a lot about the state of our squad

Results have been bad yes, but i am more concerned about what is happening long term and here Ole is doing fine. His transfers have been very good, hes giving chances to the likes of Williams and Greenwood and has frozen out dinosaurs like Mata and Matic. If the board puts their money where their mouth is and gives him funds to get a CM and and maybe Haaland in January then we might finish the season a lot stronger than we have started it. Everyone was moaning when Jose kept putting out old first XI's and kept going for short term fixes in the market. People wanted youth and they wanted us to buy for the future. Ole is doing that and still people are moaning because we've had some rough results.

Despite the shite results the players still back him. If we sack him now, how would they respond? If we get say Poch and the players dont warm up to him straight away, things might actually get worse and then he gets sacked as well and we repeat this ad infinitum.
I couldn’t care less how far off 5th we are, we’re also 2 points off 14th, but in November our top 4 chances are gone.A third of the way through the league and we’ve won 4 games, can’t even remember when we won league games back to back. Ole is doing a rubbish job, that’s the reality and he will struggle to hit the dizzy heights of David Moyes.

When you say progress you mean progress from Ole making us so bad that we couldn’t win a game to now 2 league wins in 5 games is held up as some kind of improvement not actual progress.

For the money cost I don’t see how anyone can call AWB and Maguire excellent signings, improvements but very expensive (especially Maguire).

There is no magic January transfer window, Ole will have to coach and manage his way out of this mess. What he needs to save himself is ability and skills he simply doesn’t have. Can give him time and money but you are asking an inferior manager to get the job done, that won’t change.
 

dove

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
7,899
Or maybe they don't agree with that statement.

I'd rather see the likes of McTominay, AWB, Williams, James, Rashford(in his proper position), Martial(in his proper position), Greenwood & Tuanzabe all putting in inconsistent performances but developing than watching what we watched last year with awful games and awful players with no hope to boot.
I see. So basically the only requirement we have for the manager of the biggest club in England is to play the likes of McTominay, AWB, Williams, James, Rashford and Martial (in their proper positions). Knowing United way is a nice bonus. I think our legendary kitman Albert perfectly qualifies for the manager job then. Maybe he would be better instead of Ole?
 

Smores

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2011
Messages
25,566
So no other competition matters now, then?
Whether it counts or not it certainly doesn't impact any judgement on our premier league form.

The excuses in here are desperate. Thinking he can turn it around is one thing, trying to paint the picture that we're not in crazily bad form and he's not currently doing a bad job is genuine delusion.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,309
Location
Tool shed
I don't think he will keep his job regardless. That being said, the poster I replied to cited the Premier League stats and told another poster to stop dressing up stats. That indicates that the only competition worth mentioning is the league. If that's the case, why bother competing for anything else at all then?
No that's not what I said at all.

I think the Europa is generally an important competition for a team struggling in the league who want to get top four, no doubt, and we should be looking to win it

But the quality of opposition we've played in it and the league cup (Chelsea aside) is far lower than we've played in the PL and picking just our last seven games, four of which have been in those competitions, and saying "look how much better we're doing", is very selective stat picking to suit an agenda.

Also.. it is true, the PL is much more important than either of those competitions. Managers should generally be judged on the PL results first and foremost.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,676
Location
The rainbow's end
Yeah thank feck we tied Jones, Mata, and Lingard down to new contracts.
This one of the main issues for me. Solskjaer is being credited for clearing out the deadwood, for trusting & improving our young first team and for getting his three transfers spot on. Let's leave the debate about the extent of this argument's credibility aside for a while and let's pretend that the people who suggest that he deserves full credit are correct. If he's doing all these things right and he still has the worst win % out of all United managers (post-SAF), what does this say about his actual managerial abilities? If the players are improving, if the deadwood is gone and if the transfers are successful, then why the team struggles against most midtable PL clubs? Maybe he's not good enough, after all?

I wrote on another thread that 13 of the 14 players that were utilized yesterday are in the team because Solskjaer wants them to be in the team. Jones and Pereira got new deals under him and Lingard will soon follow. His three signings were on the pitch too. His preferred attacking trident too. The youngsters that played are all part of his vision for the future. Yet, here we are with 4 wins in 13 PL games, nearly a year after his first match. People keep blabbering "Woodward this, Woodward that" but this is Solskjaer's team we're seeing week in and week out. There's no doubt about that.

All these players, like Mata-Lingard-Pereira, will be here in three years time but somehow, by some strange swing of a magical wand, we'll be title contenders.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,390
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
As long as I see a gradual improvement I am fine. Can anyone here honestly say we look better now than when Ole took over? I absolutely can't. Apart from decent 10 minute spells here and there we look horrendous in every single game. I don't even look into results much unlike most people here whose opinion is swayed way too easily by it. I just want to see us progressing, with Ole in charge we simply are not.

I also don't get the points of "transfers have been good" and "he is giving youth a chance". Transfers have been mixed bag for me. Maguire has been average so far and I predict him to join the deadwood list pretty soon. James has been OK but he had a lot of very poor performances as well, jury is still out for him. The only one you can say is a good signing for now is AWB. But it was no brainer, he was one of the top rated fullbacks in the league. Ole's playing youth is forced due to injuries. When everyone was fit, youth were nowhere near the matchday squad. The match that I fully realised Ole has no balls is the last game of the season against Cardiff where he started only Greenwood. FFS even Jose gave chance to more youngsters.

How long are we gonna let this continue I don't know but the longer we do, the more we show the world how incompetent we are. As I mentioned before, our deluded fanbase is as much to blame as our board though. We can barely win a game for half a year now but half of the fans are still Ole in. Mental. I am convinced most of these people are either oppos or they don't watch our games. There is no other logical explanation.
Well considering when Ole took over we looked like we had given up before kick off that an improvement, but we should aim higher than that. Of course things could be better, but outside of the pitch there have been improvements imo.

Maguire has not been spectacular considering his price, but solid imo. His key defensive stats (clearances, tackles, blocks) are way and beyond better than Lindelof so hes at least the best of a bad bunch. James already has 3 goals and 4 assists (should have been 6 at least) and if he keeps this up he will end the season with double digits in both. Thats good for 15 million player. AWB is great, we agree on that

Fitness and mentality also seems to have improved. Fighting back from 0-2 to get 3-2 away from home gives me hope, because its a long time since we have seen a comeback like that. With Martial out we could not score in a brothel and now suddenly we are putting 3 past Sheffield who have conceded almost no goals at home this season. Get Pogba and Scott fit again and our midfield suddenly goes from utterly shite to quite solid. Injuries happen, but right now lack of depth is killing us.

Ole is not the best manager in the world, but if he gets sacked now, Woody and many of these players will have outlived their 4th manager. Is that okay? I dont want to get into whether or not those other managers deserved the sack or not, but managers are not our only problem. When Jose was sacked we had the mother of all new manager bounces because relations between him and the players were so poor. Considering the players still back Ole, they might not react well to a change.

Getting us back on track was never a 1 season job. Ole took over a mess and it is still a mess, so if we change managers now we are placing the next one in a really unfortunate position. If we dont look better at the end of the year then he should probably go, but i honestly see no realistic benefits of changing managers mid season.
 

troylocker

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2019
Messages
2,595
So you think we got rid of Moyes too soon?
I don't think everything is that black and white. We allways seem to dig out something or someone to compare situations, players, managers to what fits our narrative. The thing is that we really haven't been in a transition state like this before, and before we get a couple of more pieces of the puzzle in place it is hard so see where this project is headed and the quality of it. Our squad and the state of it with all it's injuries makes it hard show for any sort of continuity and to judge the quality or the ceiling of it.

If you want to compare the Ole and Moyes then at least factor in this:
- Moyes inherited a PL winning squad with Rooney, RVP, Vidic, Ferdinand, Carrick, Evra, de Gea and Valencia. He didn't need to go directly into rebuildmode.
- The first thing he did was bringing in Felaini (the only one we really wanted from that Everton squad was Baines), sacking SAFs coaching team and tried to replicate what he did at Everton.
- He was never really liked and he lost the wardrobe.

Besides mediocre results, there really isn't much that is similar between the two situations.

I am pretty sure that Ole has presented a longterm vision and plan for the club to the board, and the fact that the results hasn't been as good as we want them to hasn't changed the longterm picture. If he doesn't get the support he needs from the board/Glazers to do one or two premium signings in January, I'm pretty sure it's game over for him. If he gets these signings I am very interested in seeing how far he can take us, and with more signings in the summer I think things will look a lot better. I am optimistic.
 

Red Freak

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 9, 2018
Messages
6
Location
Zimbabwe
The guy is clearly out of his depth but you just know Woodward will delay doing the inevitable because he desperately wants Ole to be a success. Ed jumped the gun by giving Ole the permanent job and the ego in him will not want to be seen like he made the wrong decision.
 

dove

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
7,899
Well considering when Ole took over we looked like we had given up before kick off that an improvement, but we should aim higher than that. Of course things could be better, but outside of the pitch there have been improvements imo.

Maguire has not been spectacular considering his price, but solid imo. His key defensive stats (clearances, tackles, blocks) are way and beyond better than Lindelof so hes at least the best of a bad bunch. James already has 3 goals and 4 assists (should have been 6 at least) and if he keeps this up he will end the season with double digits in both. Thats good for 15 million player. AWB is great, we agree on that

Fitness and mentality also seems to have improved. Fighting back from 0-2 to get 3-2 away from home gives me hope, because its a long time since we have seen a comeback like that. With Martial out we could not score in a brothel and now suddenly we are putting 3 past Sheffield who have conceded almost no goals at home this season. Get Pogba and Scott fit again and our midfield suddenly goes from utterly shite to quite solid. Injuries happen, but right now lack of depth is killing us.

Ole is not the best manager in the world, but if he gets sacked now, Woody and many of these players will have outlived their 4th manager. Is that okay? I dont want to get into whether or not those other managers deserved the sack or not, but managers are not our only problem. When Jose was sacked we had the mother of all new manager bounces because relations between him and the players were so poor. Considering the players still back Ole, they might not react well to a change.

Getting us back on track was never a 1 season job. Ole took over a mess and it is still a mess, so if we change managers now we are placing the next one in a really unfortunate position. If we dont look better at the end of the year then he should probably go, but i honestly see no realistic benefits of changing managers mid season.
I absolutely cannot see why it is not okay. That's what every single club in the world does, we need to stop thinking we are special and that any average manager will turn out to be great if we give him 5 years. It's basically saying managers are not important in football, just give a good squad to any average manager and he will do good. We all know it's not true. I fully realise it will take years to sort out this mess but is it really not possible to be at least decent and watchable while we are doing it? I just can't see how can people be okay giving a rebuilding job to someone who has showed absolutely nothing he is good enough to do it. Everyone was unhappy that Jose looked always miserable but seeing Ole always smiling after every humiliation just gets on my neves even more because it reminds me he is only hired to be a shield for our board/owners and unfortunately Ed's plan worked. Basically if instead of Ole we had someone like Dick Jones, the poll would be 80% in favour to sack right now, I am sure of it.
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,706
Well considering when Ole took over we looked like we had given up before kick off that an improvement, but we should aim higher than that. Of course things could be better, but outside of the pitch there have been improvements imo.

Maguire has not been spectacular considering his price, but solid imo. His key defensive stats (clearances, tackles, blocks) are way and beyond better than Lindelof so hes at least the best of a bad bunch. James already has 3 goals and 4 assists (should have been 6 at least) and if he keeps this up he will end the season with double digits in both. Thats good for 15 million player. AWB is great, we agree on that

Fitness and mentality also seems to have improved. Fighting back from 0-2 to get 3-2 away from home gives me hope, because its a long time since we have seen a comeback like that. With Martial out we could not score in a brothel and now suddenly we are putting 3 past Sheffield who have conceded almost no goals at home this season. Get Pogba and Scott fit again and our midfield suddenly goes from utterly shite to quite solid. Injuries happen, but right now lack of depth is killing us.

Ole is not the best manager in the world, but if he gets sacked now, Woody and many of these players will have outlived their 4th manager. Is that okay? I dont want to get into whether or not those other managers deserved the sack or not, but managers are not our only problem. When Jose was sacked we had the mother of all new manager bounces because relations between him and the players were so poor. Considering the players still back Ole, they might not react well to a change.

Getting us back on track was never a 1 season job. Ole took over a mess and it is still a mess, so if we change managers now we are placing the next one in a really unfortunate position. If we dont look better at the end of the year then he should probably go, but i honestly see no realistic benefits of changing managers mid season.
Interesting thing about that team that looked like it was beaten before kick off is Ole needs to win 3 of next 4 league games to match their points tally at same stage of season.
 

peridigm

Full Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
13,893
Interesting thing about that team that looked like it was beaten before kick off is Ole needs to win 3 of next 4 league games to match their points tally at same stage of season.
This is how I see it playing out.
Spurs - draw
City - loss
Everton - Silva(win) or Moyes (draw)
Watford - win
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
4 wins in the league and we are almost in December. Simply awful start to the season. I dont even think we will win more than 12 league games this season
 

Vault Dweller

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
6,696
Location
Vault 88, The Commonwealth
Whether it counts or not it certainly doesn't impact any judgement on our premier league form.

The excuses in here are desperate. Thinking he can turn it around is one thing, trying to paint the picture that we're not in crazily bad form and he's not currently doing a bad job is genuine delusion.
I haven't argued or stated what you have said.

All I asked was, is the Premier League be all and end all, and did no other competition matter? Whatever you think of the opposition we have played we have a quarter final in the league cup (that with all due respect we should win, then be in the semi's) and are in the knock out stages of the Europa League. Sure, the league form has been rotten, and we should be doing much better. But we have improved recently and other competitions are there to play for, surely we go for them?

No that's not what I said at all.

I think the Europa is generally an important competition for a team struggling in the league who want to get top four, no doubt, and we should be looking to win it

But the quality of opposition we've played in it and the league cup (Chelsea aside) is far lower than we've played in the PL and picking just our last seven games, four of which have been in those competitions, and saying "look how much better we're doing", is very selective stat picking to suit an agenda.

Also.. it is true, the PL is much more important than either of those competitions. Managers should generally be judged on the PL results first and foremost.
I wasn't replying to you in my first post, I don't think? So I never said that's what you said?

And that's my opinion too for what it's worth, we should absolutely be targeting the Europa League in the New Year.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,101
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
No that's not what I said at all.

I think the Europa is generally an important competition for a team struggling in the league who want to get top four, no doubt, and we should be looking to win it

But the quality of opposition we've played in it and the league cup (Chelsea aside) is far lower than we've played in the PL and picking just our last seven games, four of which have been in those competitions, and saying "look how much better we're doing", is very selective stat picking to suit an agenda.

Also.. it is true, the PL is much more important than either of those competitions. Managers should generally be judged on the PL results first and foremost.
I never think of Europa as a tier bellow CL.

Yes off course they're a tier bellow CL, but if we somehow ended up in Europa it also means we're a tier bellow CL teams. So winning Europa is never a given, even if we put all our eggs on that basket it's far from being an easy run. The later stages will have CL teams, and the top 8 will have good teams from Spain / Italy / German.

At our current form I don't think we're even top 4 favorites to win this
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,334
But surely you can rebuild whilst showing signs of good coaching?

Or can a manager only be judged after 3 years when a rebuild is complete? Did Klopp not win a Europa League whilst rebuilding and did his side not look miles better at football and coached within a few months?
Im choosing to look at the positives:

  • Results against the best teams have generally been good to very good. At the standard required for a United manager. We are not being found out tactically against the best so for me the jury is still out about the competence of this management team in that area
  • Transfers were good. I trust him to spend our money as things stand
  • We are getting a good look at our young players. By seasons end we will know which ones are going to make it here
  • Much of the dross has been cleared out from the squad. Nothing players that were hanging around and stealing a living are gone
  • The squad looks happier - morale around the club seems to be a lot better
Of course there are negatives
  • We don't always turn up against the teams we are expected to beat. Inconsistency is a problem
  • When we are bad, we are very bad. When we are good, some glimpses of an exciting team are there
  • The league position must improve - in the cups so far so good
What am I missing here? Does anyone disagree with any of the above? When you look at these things without emotion its not a terrible appraisal - and in terms of the rebuild that I feel has been essential we are made decent progress in one window. A strong midfielder and additional attacking presence added to this squad will do wonders. Until then, we are in the position where any key injury (and we've had our fair share) is going to hurt this team badly.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,101
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
This is how I see it playing out.
Spurs - draw
City - loss
Everton - Silva(win) or Moyes (draw)
Watford - win
Spurs - Lost (Mourinho knows us better than Ole knows Spurs)
City - Lost (anything other than a win for them is blinkered, they are the 100 pts team after all)
Everton - could go either way, but if it's Moyes I think they'll have a new manager bounce
Watford - Win

But the key is the Spurs/City, if that's indeed a 2 lost I don't think Everton / Watford matters, we'll be well and trully buried in midtable by then.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,101
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Im choosing to look at the positives:

  • Results against the best teams have generally been good to very good. At the standard required for a United manager. We are not being found out tactically against the best so for me the jury is still out about the competence of this management team in that area
  • Transfers were good. I trust him to spend our money as things stand
  • We are getting a good look at our young players. By seasons end we will know which ones are going to make it here
  • Much of the dross has been cleared out from the squad. Nothing players that were hanging around and stealing a living are gone
  • The squad looks happier - morale around the club seems to be a lot better
Of course there are negatives
  • We don't always turn up against the teams we are expected to beat. Inconsistency is a problem
  • When we are bad, we are very bad. When we are good, some glimpses of an exciting team are there
  • The league position must improve - in the cups so far so good
What am I missing here? Does anyone disagree with any of the above? When you look at these things without emotion its not a terrible appraisal - and in terms of the rebuild that I feel has been essential we are made decent progress in one window. A strong midfielder and additional attacking presence added to this squad will do wonders. Until then, we are in the position where any key injury (and we've had our fair share) is going to hurt this team badly.
On the bolded part. On the contrary, we win because to be honest Leicester/Liverpool are looking at us with half closed eyes. Liverpool didn't think we can hurt them and goes for the jugular since the first minute and that's actually played to our strenght (counter attack, no need to think much, hoof, run, and shoot). If they're not so cocky and treat us with respect and play the cautious game we'd be clueless on how to win.

It's not because of our tactics, it's because they're overconfident .

The dross, I fear isn't really a dross. A mismanaged player can look like a deadwood given time, only to spring to live under new teams. So what seems to be "not deadwood" in ole's first year can somehow turn into deadwoods in year 2 because of lack of coaching.

"Perreira, Lingard, Mata, Matic, Fred" - I don't know if they're actually deadwoods or just mismanaged
"AWB, Maguire" - slowly turning into mediocre players, Maguire isn't that much better than smailing the more he plays. AWB is limited at attacking and doesn't look like he'll be improving

The question is, wrong personnel for the right system? Or the right personnel in the wrong system?
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,673
I want Ole sacked but merely replacing him with another manager is not going to resolve all our problems.

The midfield and front 3 are clearly not good enough. Even when Pogba and McTominay come back we need another CM to compliment those two. James should not be a regular starter IMO. Whilst I like Rashford and Martial both are too inconsistent to be guaranteed a starting place as well. They need competition. Neville commented on the front three's lack of movement yesterday. I'm sure Ole will get blamed for not coaching them but it was exactly the same from those two players when Jose was in charge. A clear lack of movement off the ball. That tells me it's the players not putting the shift in.

Add to the fact Shaw is never fit. Williams is doing a good job as back up to be fair but again a 19 year old should not be expected to step and play every week. And I would replace Lindelof because I think he's a terrible defender and lacks the pace and strength to be in the Premier League.

So in all that's a CB, LB, two CM, ST & RW. Anyone can view my posts from the beginning of the season. We went into the season with too small of a squad and any injury to key players would ruin us. That is exactly what happened. Can you blame Ole for all of that? Yes and no, it's difficult to know who's to blame for the transfer window. We needed a mass overhaul but only if you sign players to replace them. Selling two first team CM and two forwards only to replace them with youngsters with no first team experience is absolute suicide. It's not like half our players had gone out on loan like the Chelsea youngsters, the likes of Greenwood, Williams, Gomes, Chong, Garner had played minutes for the first team.

Saying the above I would expect better results and more importantly performances against a lot of the poor teams we have played this season. We were dominated by Sheffield United for 70 minutes. One shot in that time. That has been a mirror of games against Astana, Alkmaar, Belgrade away, Bournemouth, Southampton... I could go on.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,334
On the bolded part. On the contrary, we win because to be honest Leicester/Liverpool are looking at us with half closed eyes. Liverpool didn't think we can hurt them and goes for the jugular since the first minute and that's actually played to our strenght (counter attack, no need to think much, hoof, run, and shoot). If they're not so cocky and treat us with respect and play the cautious game we'd be clueless on how to win.

It's not because of our tactics, it's because they're overconfident .

The dross, I fear isn't really a dross. A mismanaged player can look like a deadwood given time, only to spring to live under new teams. So what seems to be "not deadwood" in ole's first year can somehow turn into deadwoods in year 2 because of lack of coaching.

"Perreira, Lingard, Mata, Matic, Fred" - I don't know if they're actually deadwoods or just mismanaged
"AWB, Maguire" - slowly turning into mediocre players, Maguire isn't that much better than smailing the more he plays. AWB is limited at attacking and doesn't look like he'll be improving

The question is, wrong personnel for the right system? Or the right personnel in the wrong system?
See to me this is not an impartial opinion. The good sides we beat we did so because they didn't take us seriously? That's your honest view?

All the players that playing crap are being mismanaged?

Just reads like someone looking for the negative in everything in my view
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Quite irritated with this place lately and I see nothing done about it.

You are entitled to think Ole should be sacked and you are entitled to believe he should stay, there are arguments for both and I won't disagree with anybody who has a decent argument for their case.

What I am sick of seeing is the abuse and downright disgusting comments aimed at Ole.

Fraud, Dipshit, Idiot, Clueless feck, arsehole... It is tiring and it doesn't add to the conversation whatsoever.

Quality control here is lacking and the people who spout this drivel need sorting.
Sssshhhhhh!!!! Keep that same energy when Pogba is back and has a poor game.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,190
Im choosing to look at the positives:

  • Results against the best teams have generally been good to very good. At the standard required for a United manager. We are not being found out tactically against the best so for me the jury is still out about the competence of this management team in that area
  • Transfers were good. I trust him to spend our money as things stand
  • We are getting a good look at our young players. By seasons end we will know which ones are going to make it here
  • Much of the dross has been cleared out from the squad. Nothing players that were hanging around and stealing a living are gone
  • The squad looks happier - morale around the club seems to be a lot better
Of course there are negatives
  • We don't always turn up against the teams we are expected to beat. Inconsistency is a problem
  • When we are bad, we are very bad. When we are good, some glimpses of an exciting team are there
  • The league position must improve - in the cups so far so good
What am I missing here? Does anyone disagree with any of the above? When you look at these things without emotion its not a terrible appraisal - and in terms of the rebuild that I feel has been essential we are made decent progress in one window. A strong midfielder and additional attacking presence added to this squad will do wonders. Until then, we are in the position where any key injury (and we've had our fair share) is going to hurt this team badly.
Mata, Lingaard, Fred and Jones are dross too.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,334
Mata, Lingaard, Fred and Jones are dross too.
Agreed (though I think Mata was retained because of his influence off the pitch as much as his current abilities on it). These players will be gone as soon we can sign better players.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
What has Pogba done for our club compared to Ole? Absolute shambolic mindset if you believe this is OK.
What has Ole done? He was a good servant but gets more respect than David Beckham which is just bloody odd. Meanwhile it’s okay to call Pogba names because he didn’t score a goal in a Champions League final, but yet he’s our best player something Ole has never been.

End of the day people can critise who they want. Fans shouldn’t come out policing people especially a player of the level of Ole. When he leaves his post I’m sure there will be no love lost for what he done as a player.
 

Massive Spanner

Give Mason Mount a chance!
Joined
Jul 2, 2014
Messages
28,309
Location
Tool shed
Im choosing to look at the positives:

  • Results against the best teams have generally been good to very good. At the standard required for a United manager. We are not being found out tactically against the best so for me the jury is still out about the competence of this management team in that area
  • Transfers were good. I trust him to spend our money as things stand
  • We are getting a good look at our young players. By seasons end we will know which ones are going to make it here
  • Much of the dross has been cleared out from the squad. Nothing players that were hanging around and stealing a living are gone
  • The squad looks happier - morale around the club seems to be a lot better
Of course there are negatives
  • We don't always turn up against the teams we are expected to beat. Inconsistency is a problem
  • When we are bad, we are very bad. When we are good, some glimpses of an exciting team are there
  • The league position must improve - in the cups so far so good
What am I missing here? Does anyone disagree with any of the above? When you look at these things without emotion its not a terrible appraisal - and in terms of the rebuild that I feel has been essential we are made decent progress in one window. A strong midfielder and additional attacking presence added to this squad will do wonders. Until then, we are in the position where any key injury (and we've had our fair share) is going to hurt this team badly.
See I think the positives you mention above should be the bare minimum for any manager here. Good performances against the big teams, good transfers, good squad harmony, give the youngsters some minutes, clear out dross. I also don't agree that Ole has done all that but that's a different debate entirely.

If we were to hired a new manager and that positive list was what was given to them I'd say feck that, get a better manager who also gets us playing good football, gets our players performing well, gets our players fitter, gets consistent results, looks like he knows what he's actually doing tactically, you know, what a good manager can do.

Just because our previous managers failed to do a lot of the above positives doesn't somehow mean Ole doing them means he's in anyway good enough especially as his overall performance and results are far worse than Mourinho or LvG ever gave us.
 

momo83

Massive Snowflake
Joined
Dec 5, 2013
Messages
1,463
If the name of the manager was Sam Allerdyce... hired as interim and made permanent manager because he had a great run. By now everyone would want him sacked.
 

DoomSlayer

New Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2019
Messages
4,875
Location
Bulgaria
What has Ole done? He was a good servant but gets more respect than David Beckham which is just bloody odd. Meanwhile it’s okay to call Pogba names because he didn’t score a goal in a Champions League final, but yet he’s our best player something Ole has never been.

End of the day people can critise who they want. Fans shouldn’t come out policing people especially a player of the level of Ole. When he leaves his post I’m sure there will be no love lost for what he done as a player.
Pathetic. I should know better and not engage in such embarrassing conversation.
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
If the name of the manager was Sam Allerdyce... hired as interim and made permanent manager because he had a great run. By now everyone would want him sacked.

100% this.

Replace Ole with any other manager, exact same set of circumstances, and the poll would be around 90% get rid. It's blind loyalty and romanticism stewing in an awful, putrid pot alongside fear.

Fear, in that we've tried so many different angles and spins on our managerial approach, that this one has to work because the alternative is that maybe we are just genuinely fecked as a major club for the foreseeable future.
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,400
Location
Flagg
I think you picked the wrong game to argue this on. For 70 minutes we were truly awful and whilst I agree the midfield need to take some of the blame, Martial was poor, Rashford was back to his headless chicken routine and James showed his passing isn't up to it.

Not that I disagree that they are exciting but yesterday they were poor by and large. I also think James is the back up to a United standard winger, not firat place. And Martial showed again that it is a risk to rely on him to be the key man despite recent good games. He was basically anonymous.
They scored 3 goals in a game the opposition dominated. Are you able to explain how you expect a forward to be effective when the rest of the team is incapable of giving them the ball?

If you're going to slag off our front players every time they don't rip the opposition apart for the whole 90 minutes, you're never going to think anyone we play there is good enough.
 

Handsome Devil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
1,482
Location
No, not Lisbon..Lisburn!
I am pretty sure that Ole has presented a longterm vision and plan for the club to the board, and the fact that the results hasn't been as good as we want them to hasn't changed the longterm picture. If he doesn't get the support he needs from the board/Glazers to do one or two premium signings in January, I'm pretty sure it's game over for him. If he gets these signings I am very interested in seeing how far he can take us, and with more signings in the summer I think things will look a lot better. I am optimistic.
Ole obviously knows his way round Microsoft Office. He is a Powerpoint legend and knows the Excel way. This would go down well with Ed.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,101
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
See to me this is not an impartial opinion. The good sides we beat we did so because they didn't take us seriously? That's your honest view?

All the players that playing crap are being mismanaged?

Just reads like someone looking for the negative in everything in my view
I don't find positives in 10th

If you happened to find more positives than negatives in our currect predicament then maybe you enjoy being 10th. I don't
 
Status
Not open for further replies.