Leaks in the past few years suggest that we tried to hire a few other managers before we ended up with Moyes. Apparently even Mourinho. Moyes should've never been hired, he was rightly fired, and should've gone earlier. I agree.
I disagree with the other two. If we fired Van Gaal by christmas, chances are we wouldn't have got Mourinho anyway, and not giving Mourinho a chance after finishing 2nd and winning the Europa League would've been wrong. Ballsy, sure, but wrong.
See, this doesn't make any sense to me. We have tried 4 (5, if you count Giggsy) managers since Sir Alex Ferguson, and you and
@Mainoldo would´ve preferd if we had 6, 7, or even 8 in the same span? Yet you claim you're "all for stability with the right manager"?
If we actually hire a competent DOF, and have a solid, world class core of players, sure. But with the dross we've had to deal with for the past 7 seasons, any chance for stability and finding out who the right manager actually is, is completely unrealistic. They all break the bank for players who suit their philosophy, making it impossible for anyone who comes after to actually perform well enough to create any sort of stability. Heck, they couldn't even do it themselves with the players they signed!
Compare us with Barca, Madrid, Juventus and Bayern, for example. For them to be as ruthless as they are when it comes to changing the manager, the squad needs to be world class, and for the new manager to come to a well run organization ready to compete. Not only the first XI, but the squad, club and organization as a whole. We have, and haven't had, none of those things in many, many years now.
If you can't compete for the league title and/or CL with the squads those teams have, you deserve to be fired. The manager isn't even in charge of, barely even involved in, player logistics in those clubs.
When we have an objectively world class squad, and a legitimate claim to be a well run football club (not just a well run business), we can start acting like the ruthless clubs elsewhere in Europe.