Guy Incognito
Full Member
I predict this thread will continue to float around the top until December when he gets sacked.
Regarding your last sentence, I dont know either. Some managers are made for league campaigns and some for cup runs, it doesn't mean one is better than other.It can be but the nature of the format means luck also plays an important part. Luck with draws, luck with refs, luck to make sure you don't have an off day on that day. I have seen on many occasion Manchester United under sir alex getting knocked out even when we were the better side. It is far more entertaining and maybe even prestigious than winning the league (we definitely should have won more than 2 times under sir alex) but I am not too sure if winning it makes you a better manager than say someone who wins the PL.
Must be so jelly, he's only won the World Cup, World Cup golden ball, Euros, euro best player, ballon d'or, FIFA best player, italian serie A x2, La Liga, Champions League...Yeah, he really must be...
No. Just no.Need to stop the rot, Madrid deserve better
Every major league has been won consecutive times by multiple teams over the last 30 years(except maybe the bundes?). Real Madrid were the first to win the CL back-to-back in the CL era, first to do it since Milan 89 and 90, and first to win 3 in a row since Bayern in the 70s...Similarly Madrid have won CL 4 times in the last 6 odd years but they were only the best team in the league once. In CL if you are good on that day and have luck on your side chances are you can go to the latter stages and even win the trophy. Again no way I am seeing all CL winners are lucky but for me winning a league is a bit more challenging considering you need to be consistent for most of the season.
t'was a joke, I hope they rotNo. Just no.
That's the problem, you were using that example when the main debate at stake was Pep's achievements and his performances in CL:I never said city would have won the CL had they beaten SPurs. Don't know where you got that from. Point was Man city over the last 2 years have got the better of Spurs in all matches bar one which ultimately proved to be a knock out blow and that is why I referenced the spurs example.
Regarding your second point I don't understand what relevance that has to do with the original point considering I was just using last season's example.
And since those performances involved rivals other than Spurs as well, and after those rounds many quality experienced teams were awaiting, I don't know how your example proves to be a good reference for the debate.I know some value winning the CL more but I would say winning the league especially in PL is much harder than winning a CL. City could play Tottenham again and 9 out of 10 times city will beat Tottenham. I am not defending Pep or giving any excuse but one cannot take away his achievements.
I myself have been critical of Pep's management in CL game so my point was not to defend Pep's failure to do well in CL. I was just commenting on the fact how some think Zidane's achievement with Madrid is better than Pep's . Personally, it is difficult to compare considering one has done well in knock out formats and other has done extremely well winning the league, which is where I said for me winning the league especially in England is much harder than winning the CL. It is matter of opinion. I don't blame if you feel otherwise.That's the problem, you were using that example when the main debate at stake was Pep's achievements and his performances in CL:
And since those performances involved rivals other than Spurs as well, and after those rounds many quality experienced teams were awaiting, I don't know how your example proves to be a good reference for the debate.
It is objectively easier to win a league -any league- than the CLI myself have been critical of Pep's management in CL game so my point was not to defend Pep's failure to do well in CL. I was just commenting on the fact how some think Zidane's achievement with Madrid is better than Pep's . Personally, it is difficult to compare considering one has done well in knock out formats and other has done extremely well winning the league, which is where I said for me winning the league especially in England is much harder than winning the CL. It is matter of opinion. I don't blame if you feel otherwise.
I disagree with that. Like I said you need to be consistent enough to win the league. In CL , if you have luck of draws with you and ref's decision then you can very well reach the latter stages to even win it, Chelsea 2011 being the prime example. Ofcourse one has to play well and cannot solely depend on luck but luck plays a huge role in CL or any knock out format than a league format.It is objectively easier to win a league -any league- than the CL
Now if your argument is that the league is a better judge of quality, then sure, i kind of agree with that
To win the league you need to be good/great. To win the CL you need to be good/great AND lucky. Easier to be good than good and luckyI disagree with that. Like I said you need to be consistent enough to win the league. In CL , if you have luck of draws with you and ref's decision then you can very well reach the latter stages to even win it, Chelsea 2011 being the prime example. Ofcourse one has to play well and cannot solely depend on luck but luck plays a huge role in CL or any knock out format than a league format.
ThisZidane going back to RM was such a dumb move.
Now everyone is seeing what a few people already suspected - his success was on the back of one of the best players in history and a few core players peaking at the right time and not because he is a genius coach.
Can't say I'm surprised, he always seemed tactical naive
If you are arguably the best team in your country, it's easier to win the league. If you aren't, it's easier to win the CL as luck does play a larger part.To win the league you need to be good/great. To win the CL you need to be good/great AND lucky. Easier to be good than good and lucky
Some people think the world is flat in 2019. Nothing surprises me anymore.I thought he was joking. How can anyone possibly think Bale has been more successful than Zidane?
Roberto Di Matteo won the CL with Chelsea. And he was not, is not and will never be a good/great manager. You can win the CL with alot of luck. You just can have an easy run till to the final and then just win it.To win the league you need to be good/great. To win the CL you need to be good/great AND lucky. Easier to be good than good and lucky
To win the league you need to be consistent not just good/great.To win the league you need to be good/great. To win the CL you need to be good/great AND lucky. Easier to be good than good and lucky
Well it was bullshit where ever it came from.Easy there. Was breaking news on Talksport Radio. It just seemed current whilst I was...ya know...in this Real Madrid thread.
They kept their attack and got Griezmann. Bolstered their midfield. And Messi is a monster in the league. Barcelona is gonna retain itAt everyone writing him off before a ball is even kicked. They’ve made some awesome signings and preseason is genuinely nothing to go by. We couldn’t even beat nöosteewhoeverthefecktheyare until the 91st minute today. He’ll get them playing well in my opinion and probably win them the league if Barce don’t get the Neymar deal over the line.
We should still a few more months before making premature conclusions already. It doesn't look good at the moment but things can change. Too many people love to tell others "i told you so".Zidane going back to RM was such a dumb move.
Now everyone is seeing what a few people already suspected - his success was on the back of one of the best players in history and a few core players peaking at the right time and not because he is a genius coach.
Can't say I'm surprised, he always seemed tactically naive
I really hope Perez goes after Mourinho... if Zidane gets sacked. Would be hilarious.Poch becomes manager in November
Maybe. But it's not surprising if you think about it.We should still a few more months before making premature conclusions already. It doesn't look good at the moment but things can change. Too many people love to tell others "i told you so".
Of course it's not surprising, still a little too early to write them/him off. Patience never hurt anybodyMaybe. But it's not surprising if you think about it.
In his first run he had a complete world class squad playing at their peak and with a system already in place from the previous managers. Ronaldo was the main core piece that made the system work and every core player were delivering in a consistent basis (specially in the CL).
You could already see that Zidane was really naive tactical wise and his best attributes were locker room management and tbf that was exactly what RM needed.
Now the story is completely different. Ronaldo is gone, most of the core players from those seasons are declining hard and you just can't use the same system by replacing Ronaldo with Hazard and expect it to work.
I honestly can see him having a better season than the last one, but atp RM are miles behind Barcelona and Atlético and I doubt Zidane will be the right person to close the gap.
He signs a contract extension at Man United.Imagine if he and real did part ways before the end of the season and Mourinho took over considering he was in contention before they re-hired zidane, what then for pogba next summer if he remains at United this summer?