Zlatan Rejoins United

How do you feel about Zlatan signing for another year?


  • Total voters
    1,187

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,490
Location
Hollywood CA
Except I can imagine Ibra, even at his age, will be wanting more game time. Maybe that’ll be a good thing for the strikers in terms of competition, but hopefully it doesn’t turn Ibra’s charismatic, positive influence in the dressing room into something else. Sometimes too many big egos can be too much, just look at PSG or R. Madrid (at times).

I think Ibra has the professionalism needed to realise he’s not the player or starter he once was and will be required to take up up a different role. He’s one of the best characters ever in football so I trust him
I think Ibra and Mourinho are well in sync with one another's expectations after all these years. Jose has the luxury of brining Ibra back slowly so there's no pressure on anyone in that regard. Once Zlatan is back to full fitness, he can be used strategically in certain situations and the fact that he is looming will only make Lukaku more competitive. Having another 6 months of exposure to Ibra will also be helpful to Rashford and Martial.
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,672
Location
Melbourne
I'm quite intrigued about what Zlatan could do as the no.10 instead of Mkhitaryan or Mata. He's certainly capable of defense-splitting passes and impossible to be bullied off the ball. At various points in the matches we've played so far Lukaku has drifted outwards so having Zlatan occupying the central spaces when that happens would obviously give defenders something to think about.

Besides, he'd make our set pieces even more lethal. Imagine having to mark Lukaku, Zlatan and Fellaini all at once. Pogba is also capable of good headers, so is Smalling.
 

Ashley R1+O

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 3, 2016
Messages
2,174
I'm quite intrigued about what Zlatan could do as the no.10 instead of Mkhitaryan or Mata.
I genuinely think this is absolutely mental to want to see Zlatan at 10. He could barely move and transition with speed when playing up front last season, him playing at 10 to me sounds awful and something that I don't particularly want to experience.

Each to their own though, as a squad player/rotational player I can think of none better than Zlatan, especially for Lukaku and how brightly Romelu has started this season. Could be the perfect little foil to wrap around our squad going through the rigors of the season, especially in the knockout phases of the CL if we progress in the LC and the FA cup. Apart from Lukaku we don't really have that 'like for like' number 9 that can keep the stability in our attacking unit. I think we'd have to change the way we play slightly to accommodate Martial/Rashford up front.
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,672
Location
Melbourne
I genuinely think this is absolutely mental to want to see Zlatan at 10. He could barely move and transition with speed when playing up front last season, him playing at 10 to me sounds awful and something that I don't particularly want to experience.

Each to their own though, as a squad player/rotational player I can think of none better than Zlatan, especially for Lukaku and how brightly Romelu has started this season. Could be the perfect little foil to wrap around our squad going through the rigors of the season.
It could be like Rooney in his last years here, or it could work with the pace from Rashford and Martial and Lukaku in the team.

I think there are more than one way to skin a cat and Mkhitaryan hasn't exactly set the world alight even with his numbers. Zlatan is quite terrible in transition as the one running on the end of the pass but as the one making the pass? Worth a try, especially if Mourinho intends on making him part of the starting XI.
 

Fox E Power

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 10, 2014
Messages
286
Location
Berlin
I genuinely think this is absolutely mental to want to see Zlatan at 10. He could barely move and transition with speed when playing up front last season, him playing at 10 to me sounds awful and something that I don't particularly want to experience.
Zlatan was a dynamic #10 for PSG only 18 months ago and banged in 50 goals from that position. Cavani and Lukaku are obviously different players, but I see no reason why Zlatan and Romelu can't have the same dynamic as those two had at PSG.
 

AgentP

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
4,957
Location
Chennai
Zlatan was a dynamic #10 for PSG only 18 months ago and banged in 50 goals from that position. Cavani and Lukaku are obviously different players, but I see no reason why Zlatan and Romelu can't have the same dynamic as those two had at PSG.
Did this happen? I always thought Zlatan played as striker and Cavani was used as a wide forward.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
Zlatan and Lukaku can be a good partnership in 3-5-2 or the diamond. The diamond actually looks really interesting for me :

De Gea
Valencia - Bailly - Jones - Young
Matic
Herrera/Fellaini - Pogba
Mikhi
Zlatan - Lukaku​

Its only is the flanks will be quite exposed on defending but can be used against parked buses. Not to mention we'll have both Rashford and Martial on the bench also!

The 3-5-2 also :

De Gea
Bailly - Lindelof - Jones
Valencia - Matic - Pogba - Young
Mikhi
Zlatan - Lukaku​

I can see this happening more than the diamond, may be in some away games in Europe. The flanks are well covered by the wing back and defender behind him, while Zlatan will drop deep to help Mikhi and Pogba in building the attack, interesting. Again Rashford and Martial are still on the bench, though.

One thing for sure : Zlatan will give us numerous options either as a starter in some games or a sub in others.
 

2 man midfield

Last Man Standing finalist 2021/22
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
46,252
Location
?
Bailly, Matic, Pogba, Ibra, Lukaku :drool:

We should just ask the opposition to let us walk it in, who'd stand up to that lot?
 

MuFc_1992

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2014
Messages
1,212
It would be interesting to use him in 4-4-2 against smaller teams. Zlatan has the tendency to drop back and lukaku likes to stay up front so It could be the perfect strike partnership.
 

Klopp_De_Klown

Full Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
1,555
Didn't I read yesterday that the doctor who did the surgery has advised/warned Zlatan to slow down his recovery?
 

DannyCAFC

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
2,427
Supports
Charlton Athletic
I genuinely think this is absolutely mental to want to see Zlatan at 10. He could barely move and transition with speed when playing up front last season, him playing at 10 to me sounds awful and something that I don't particularly want to experience.

Each to their own though, as a squad player/rotational player I can think of none better than Zlatan, especially for Lukaku and how brightly Romelu has started this season. Could be the perfect little foil to wrap around our squad going through the rigors of the season, especially in the knockout phases of the CL if we progress in the LC and the FA cup. Apart from Lukaku we don't really have that 'like for like' number 9 that can keep the stability in our attacking unit. I think we'd have to change the way we play slightly to accommodate Martial/Rashford up front.
Yeah it's pretty crazy, as you say transitioning speed has been key for United so far this season, he's way too slow in that regard. He held up United's speed of play enough as it is last season as a lone target-man, it's only gonna be worse as a #10.
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,734
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
Zlatan and Lukaku can be a good partnership in 3-5-2 or the diamond. The diamond actually looks really interesting for me :

De Gea
Valencia - Bailly - Jones - Young
Matic
Herrera/Fellaini - Pogba
Mikhi
Zlatan - Lukaku​

Its only is the flanks will be quite exposed on defending but can be used against parked buses. Not to mention we'll have both Rashford and Martial on the bench also!

The 3-5-2 also :

De Gea
Bailly - Lindelof - Jones
Valencia - Matic - Pogba - Young
Mikhi
Zlatan - Lukaku​

I can see this happening more than the diamond, may be in some away games in Europe. The flanks are well covered by the wing back and defender behind him, while Zlatan will drop deep to help Mikhi and Pogba in building the attack, interesting. Again Rashford and Martial are still on the bench, though.

One thing for sure : Zlatan will give us numerous options either as a starter in some games or a sub in others.
I'd play Zlatan in the #10 role ahead of Mkhi in those line ups. He'd get the time and space on the ball with Lukaku and Rashford or Martial ahead of him and he'd be absolutely lethal making late runs into the box. With his ability to guard the ball, no more unnecessary ball losses like with Mkhitaryan and he can pick a pass too with runners ahead of him and on the flanks.


deGea
Bailly Smalling Jones
Valencia Matic Pogba Young
Zlatan
Lukaku Rashford​
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,832
Location
Manchester
Very narrowed view. Personally I feel we don't particularly need him, his experience is a plus admittedly. I think certain traits of his style (ie coming deep toward the ball) is a negative and results in us struggling to break teams down due to the opposition being able to squeeze higher and the subsequent lack of space for his fellow attackers. Would prefer Rashford or Martial up top when Lukaku not available.
What happens if Lukaku gets injured for a month, or 2 months? Play Rashford or Martial as centre forward? Then who do we play on the left? Who do we bring on when chasing a game? Rashford or Martial are not good enough to play as the centre forward that Mourinho likes. They are better running at defenders, they won't hold the ball up and bring others in to play.
 

BenjaminP

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 17, 2016
Messages
572
Will he accept the bench role/ super sub role when he comes back?

Surely big Rom is a definite starter.
 

carlosp

Full Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2009
Messages
10,073
Location
The land of Vuvuzela's
Will he accept the bench role/ super sub role when he comes back?

Surely big Rom is a definite starter.
With all the games, Carabao Cup, Premier League, FA Cup, Champions League as well as the heavy fixtures during December, Ibra will get game time in December and into the new year up to March/April depending on how we do in all the competitions of course.
 

AgentP

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
4,957
Location
Chennai
Looks like he's back sooner than we expected. I just hope we don't change the whole system just to fit in Zlatan and Rom in the same line-up.
 

adkb

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
269
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
 

JoaquinJoaquin

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
8,609
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
Well my honest opinion is that we thought we had Griezmann signed and he was going to play as the support striker to Lukaku but when that fell through then getting Zlatan back made a lot of sense for all parties.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,950
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
I think the club and Zlatan had a gentlemens agreement that he resigns when he can train again. There's no value in paying 250k per week for a player who can't train for 6 months.

That's why when he left the club announced he will continue to rehabilitate with us. And obviously when he started showing progress, the new contact was made official. It's smart on the club's behalf to not commit until reasonably sure of progress. That sort of injury at 35 can be a career ender.
 

Kapardin

New Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2017
Messages
9,917
Location
Chennai, India
Looks like he's back sooner than we expected. I just hope we don't change the whole system just to fit in Zlatan and Rom in the same line-up.
Class players can play in several systems. Our players need to get used to being comfortable in a 4-3-3, 4-2-3-1, 3-5-2, etc. So I am all for trying it out against weaker opposition. If it clicks, it gives us so many options.
 

Escobar

Shameless Musketeer
Joined
Jun 8, 2004
Messages
30,249
Location
La-La-Land
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
I dont see a problem. I guess we first wanted to see how his regeneration is going before signing him and await our activity in the transfer market
 
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
23,019
Location
Somewhere out there
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
We never let him go, Zlatan has confirmed that.
He continued to train with the club & once everyone saw that the surgery and first stage of recovery had gone well, a new contract was signed.
 

GM K

Full Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2017
Messages
4,601
The best scenario for me is Zlatan as a back up for Lukaku not squeezing him into the team to play with Lukaku.

Imagine if Lukaku suddenly gets injured. It would be a massive relief to have Zlatan as an option together with Rashford. None of the other top six will have such a back up.
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
13,049
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
He never left the club, his contract expired.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,490
Location
Hollywood CA
Does anyone think it was absolutely poor management on this front? For I read that Zlatan had left the club for certain. Only to realise that after a few months he was back and had signed a contract. Surely thats not normal. There must have been a massive goof up. Did zlatan not get any offer to join and he came back to us? I really cant wrap my head around this one. But I am very curious as to why we had to let him go first and then sign him again. ?!
Yep. No one wanted him and sadly we were forced to give him a new contract.
 

adkb

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
269
Yep. No one wanted him and sadly we were forced to give him a new contract.
Haha. I don't mean that he was rejected by everyone. And injured 35 year old can face tough time getting into big clubs. However I was only wondering that the club officially announced that he has left and then signed him again. Strange happenings when its at a club as big as ours!
 

BarstoolProphet

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2014
Messages
6,595
Haha. I don't mean that he was rejected by everyone. And injured 35 year old can face tough time getting into big clubs. However I was only wondering that the club officially announced that he has left and then signed him again. Strange happenings when its at a club as big as ours!
Probably due to new terms in his contract?