- Joined
- May 13, 2008
- Messages
- 16,820
Did Mitt drop a clanger picking Ryan over Rubio?
I'm surprised Ryan accepted.Rubio would not have tied himself to this loser.
Like him or not, agree with his politics or not one thing he clearly isn't is a loser. He has succeeded in pretty much everything he has been involved with and done a fair amount of charitable and volunteer work as well.Rubio would not have tied himself to this loser.
qualified to destroy this country.Like him or not, agree with his politics or not one thing he clearly isn't is a loser. He has succeeded in pretty much everything he has been involved with and done a fair amount of charitable and volunteer work as well.
He may have odious political beliefs and the personality of a loofah but he is probably one of the more qualified Presidential candidates of the last few decades.
Ryan has nothing to lose. He is an ideologue. No critical thinking.I'm surprised Ryan accepted.
You have been watching far too many political adverts.qualified to destroy this country.
He made his fortune destroying companies...and lives.
...says the guy who watches Fox news for information....You have been watching far too many political adverts.
I don't watch Fox, EVER, never have and most likely never will. Unlike you I am not aligned to either party. I am not so warped and biased I crawl all over the tit bits of false information that suit my beliefs....says the guy who watches Fox news for information....
speaking of Fox, the gf just sent me this link http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/30/paul-ryans-speech-in-three-words/ from their site. A surprisingly scathing review of Ryan's speech. Takes serious issue with the myriad lies and half truths. I realize it's an op-ed, but she's still a contributor to Fox news....says the guy who watches Fox news for information....
I understand she is the 'token liberal'. Still fair enough that they let that though. tbf I used to watch Wallace just before I switched to Russet. Well after him...just stopped watching both except very occasionally nowadays.speaking of Fox, the gf just sent me this link http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/08/30/paul-ryans-speech-in-three-words/ from their site. A surprisingly scathing review of Ryan's speech. Takes serious issue with the myriad lies and half truths. I realize it's an op-ed, but she's still a contributor to Fox news.
Anyway, was a bit surprised to see it.
At least the others aren't throwing peanuts at them and saying "this is how we feed the animals" like they were two nights ago.You have to love how the cameras finds the five black people in the building and give them plenty of face time.
The GOP has a base of around 45-46%, as do the Democrats. Americans by nature are fairly conservative so the independents can vote for either party depending on candidate.fortunately that 'crowd' is fast becoming the minority.
You need to watch Clint, highlight of the RNC.Where can I watch this? Any streams?
Not really sure what your problem is there. She was asked a leading question and she answered it perfectly deflecting attention off the GOP candidate.Warning: Your IQ may drop significantly by watching this video. My brain just melted and ran out of the back of my skull and my nose.
Her explanation makes zero sense. "Well, President Obama can't connect with normal people because he's just so astronomically wealthy and has been for so long." Oh, well then, the Fortunate Son surely has much better connections with "common people." The argument doesn't work at all when the person being attacked has more than 100 times less money than the other, wasn't born into wealth, etc.Not really sure what your problem is there. She was asked a leading question and she answered it perfectly deflecting attention off the GOP candidate.
Either she doesn't understand the question or is just showing off being an ignorant hag again.
"Look President Obama is rich too" isn't really a valid deflection.She was asked a leading question and she answered it perfectly deflecting attention off the GOP candidate.
It goes both ways. You can keep spending and running up deficits either. At the end of the day both parties are a crock of shit. We need to raise taxes (on everyone) and cut spending.The whole " you can have your cake and eat it too" platform is just amazing. Lower taxes for everyone and make investments in your children for everyone.
Let the Federal Govt get out of your hair and leave it to the states when the states are cutting back?
Are people that dumb? 1+1+1 isn't always 3 I guess in their twisted (by Fox) minds.
fecking cringe-worthy. Watching the RNC is quite surreal.* Laughing at rising sea levels.
* USA chants at the invasion of Iraq, meaning i suppose that even with the benefit hindsight they'd do t all over again.
* Conflict with Iran on his agenda.
* Bluster about Russia.
What a crowd.
From literally the same place Obama got his.I'm sure I heard old man Clint say that lawyers shouldn't be president. Romney has a JD.
he did, and he does (sort or, its Law with Business Admin).I'm sure I heard old man Clint say that lawyers shouldn't be president. Romney has a JD.
No "sort of" about it. It's a Harvard JD, and he passed the bar in Michigan.he did, and he does (sort or, its Law with Business Admin).
It's no longer 'make my day' instead it's 'what day is it?"
you willing to cut defense?It goes both ways. You can keep spending and running up deficits either. At the end of the day both parties are a crock of shit. We need to raise taxes (on everyone) and cut spending.