Victor Mugabe Wanyama

Status
Not open for further replies.

Freak

Born a freak always a freak.
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
23,131
Location
Somewhere in your mind, touching a nerve
If he makes another 40 passes chances are he's going to cock up a fair bit more and not look as good on your youtube video. That doesnt mean he lacks passing technique or something, just that he still has a lot to prove in that area before a top club wants to pay £15 million or whatever figure was talked about earlier in the thread. If he can do that and play 50 passes in a team that has the ball a lot more then great. That would still be half a Carrick though
Even if he makes 50 passes, how many of those are going to be risky enough for him to lose it? He's going to be playing deep, thus he's going to be making simple ones, to the oncoming fullbacks, or to his more attacking midfielder, or back to the defenders. None of those would be more than a 15 yards. If he can't even do that, then yes he's not good enough. But I think he would be capable.
 

ciderman9000000

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
29,640
Location
The General
This is why you shouldnt be comparing a defenders passing stats to someone playing in the hole. But if you insist on doing so, look at the right passing stats. Look at key passes, assists, crosses, accurate long balls, etc. They're all out there. And once you've looked at those you'll see the key difference between Ferdinand and Rooney. Or a Gareth Barry and Rooney.
And yet you can compare Darren Fletcher's stats in a United midfield to Wanyama's stats in a entirely different Celtic midfield playing an entirely different role in an entirely different system?

No, it's why you shouldn't be judging anybody by passing stats. Different midfield roles will effect passing stats the same way as will different positions on the pitch (Forward compared to Central Defence etc.); you can't compare two players in different teams performing different roles on their passing stats; the myriad of variables just make such comparisons absolutely pointless. The only way to determine passing ability in the player in comparison to another is through watching them play, not through statistics.

If you actually read my post that you've replied to, you'll see how dramatically you've missed the point.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
15,024
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl
The pain that he's absolute class and exactly what we are lacking. We fecked up, he's awesome. Your bitter if you think otherwise.
I keep wondering if Sir Alex got it wrong by not playing him more last season and that lead to him leaving, but then I remember that he wasn't actually playing that well consistently for the reserves and whenever he played for the first team he was overawed by the occasion.

He's a great talent and he'll probably become the midfielder that we need in our midfield but based on everything I've seen of him upto this season, going to a league where he will be allowed more time on the ball will definitely suit him better than the fast frantic pace of the English game.
 

Shimo

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
8,082
The pain that he's absolute class and exactly what we are lacking. We fecked up, he's awesome. Your bitter if you think otherwise.
Man, if I didn't have you tell me how I should be feeling, I'd be lost.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,544
Location
Hope, We Lose
Still bears no relevance as Wanyama is mainly being judged off of his European form, as plenty do not watch the SPL.

Anyway it is bizarre logic. We signed Rio, Cantona and Smith from Leeds. Go figure.
What? You do realise that the teams Rio and Cantona were playing in were good Leeds sides yes?

It has plenty of relevance, Ki was outstanding for Korea and yet he's at Swansea and didnt cost the earth to sign. Its a sign of the times for Scottish football and Ki has proven more than Wanyama has just yet.
 

Pink Moon

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
8,285
Location
Glasgow
Supports
Celtic
What? You do realise that the teams Rio and Cantona were playing in were good Leeds sides yes?

It has plenty of relevance, Ki was outstanding for Korea and yet he's at Swansea and didnt cost the earth to sign. Its a sign of the times for Scottish football and Ki has proven more than Wanyama has just yet.
Ki was sold cheaply because his contract had about a year remaining and it's better to cash in than lose him for nothing. Wanyama is contracted to 2015 so the circumstances are extremely different.

No team will pay a bomb for a player they can get for free if they wait a little bit.

Ki hasn't proven more than Wanyama either. I would say that when you're playing in the SPL, the Champions League is where you'll be judged properly and Wanyama has been brilliant in this year's CL. Ki's proven what that Wanyama hasn't?
 

jem

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
9,373
Location
Toronto
The pain that he's absolute class and exactly what we are lacking. We fecked up, he's awesome. Your bitter if you think otherwise.
I'll admit to having seen very little of Pogba, but isn't he an attacking midfielder? And if so, I'm not sure that he's what we are lacking, given that we have Cleverley, Anderson, Rooney and even Kagawa, who can play that role.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,544
Location
Hope, We Lose
Ki was sold cheaply because his contract had about a year remaining and it's better to cash in than lose him for nothing. Wanyama is contracted to 2015 so the circumstances are extremely different.

No team will pay a bomb for a player they can get for free if they wait a little bit.

Ki hasn't proven more than Wanyama either. I would say that when you're playing in the SPL, the Champions League is where you'll be judged properly and Wanyama has been brilliant in this year's CL. Ki's proven what that Wanyama hasn't?
That he's international standout quality. Not just someone who puts in 6 tackles in a game your team has none of the ball.

Wanyama's contract is running down too, the point you missed is that Swansea were the side going for Ki. Not Manchester United.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,544
Location
Hope, We Lose
I'll admit to having seen very little of Pogba, but isn't he an attacking midfielder? And if so, I'm not sure that he's what we are lacking, given that we have Cleverley, Anderson, Rooney and even Kagawa, who can play that role.
Pogba certainly is attacking, but we have Carrick, Fletcher, Cleverley and Anderson who have all done the sitting role
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,544
Location
Hope, We Lose
And yet you can compare Darren Fletcher's stats in a United midfield to Wanyama's stats in a entirely different Celtic midfield playing an entirely different role in an entirely different system?
Compare a midfielder with a midfielder... Heavens no, its exactly the same as comparing a CB with a Striker.
 

ciderman9000000

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
29,640
Location
The General
Compare a midfielder with a midfielder... Heavens no, its exactly the same as comparing a CB with a Striker.
Comparing a United player's passing stats to a Celtic player's passing stats is equally as pointless as comparing Rooney's to Rio's. Have you ever seen Celtic play?
 

Pink Moon

Full Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2009
Messages
8,285
Location
Glasgow
Supports
Celtic
That he's international standout quality. Not just someone who puts in 6 tackles in a game your team has none of the ball.

Wanyama's contract is running down too, the point you missed is that Swansea were the side going for Ki. Not Manchester United.
Ki stands out internationally because he plays for a very good team in South Korea. Wanyama plays for Kenya. It's a really unfair comparison.

You keep on dismissing a defensive midfielder's performance in disrupting the best team on the planet's attacking all night. Strange that you've repeatedly ignored that and instead focused on his passing statistics in a match where no one was bursting forward to support and offer an outlet for the ball. The tactics were to win the ball back and get it forward quickly to trouble their makeshift centre backs. Why don't we look at his passing stats after the next SPL game if that's all your interested in?

Honestly, it sounds like you won't be interested in any midfielder unless it's a perfect blend of Xavi and Roy Keane.
 

mo0

Full Member
Joined
Jul 20, 2010
Messages
1,615
Location
@englandyouth
Because Wotton and Keane are not ready
Jones, Rio, Smalling, Vidic, Evans are injury-prone
ha, so when is 'ready'? and all FIVE CB's are "injury prone"?

listen to yourself!

no trust in the youth setup and no trust in the current senior setup.

why is there a need to buy when there most certainly isn't a need to buy! there are 7 players, with Carrick an arguable 8th, listed. that's FOUR per position.

:wenger:
 

Baxter

Full Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
11,738
Wanyama would be bought to play in midfield. It's just useful he can cover in defence, much better than Carrick for example.
 

Giggsforever

Full Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2008
Messages
3,133
The pain that he's absolute class and exactly what we are lacking. We fecked up, he's awesome. Your bitter if you think otherwise.
I agree, Pogba is simply fantasic, he is so much more than Cleverly and Fletcher as the most recent midfielders comming trough. He will become one of the best midfielders around. He really has it all. I think SAF should be a bit less principal when it comes to the youth players.

Only thing that can cheer me up is that we have Mats Moller Daehli and he is a even greater talent and he will never be involved in anything like this beeing that he is norwegian. He is a different player and they might have been the next great midfield pairing, but as he is the most attacking, creative player, I would take him over Pogba as he is a more rare bread. But, Pogba had it all, he was a holding player with more football in him than most attacking players.
 

ciderman9000000

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 22, 2006
Messages
29,640
Location
The General
I agree, Pogba is simply fantasic, he is so much more than Cleverly and Fletcher as the most recent midfielders comming trough. He will become one of the best midfielders around. He really has it all. I think SAF should be a bit less principal when it comes to the youth players.

Only thing that can cheer me up is that we have Mats Moller Daehli and he is a even greater talent and he will never be involved in anything like this beeing that he is norwegian. He is a different player and they might have been the next great midfield pairing, but as he is the most attacking, creative player, I would take him over Pogba as he is a more rare bread. But, Pogba had it all, he was a holding player with more football in him than most attacking players.
If that were truly the case then SAF would have given him a contract. You can't make such gushing assessments of a player based on nothing but reserve team football.
 

gulli_G

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2000
Messages
3,569
Location
UK
I agree, Pogba is simply fantasic, he is so much more than Cleverly and Fletcher as the most recent midfielders comming trough. He will become one of the best midfielders around. He really has it all. I think SAF should be a bit less principal when it comes to the youth players.

Only thing that can cheer me up is that we have Mats Moller Daehli and he is a even greater talent and he will never be involved in anything like this beeing that he is norwegian. He is a different player and they might have been the next great midfield pairing, but as he is the most attacking, creative player, I would take him over Pogba as he is a more rare bread. But, Pogba had it all, he was a holding player with more football in him than most attacking players.
truth was pogba wanted scholes or carricks spot, but as good as he is he was never going to dislodge them, or even cleverly at the stage of development he was at, Fergie wants loyalty and player to have desire to play for the club, Ravel and Pogba lacked that, and possibly Nani, so they must go.

see the link below for other reasons which maybe Fergie realised during pogba's time here, but kept it on the quiet:

http://www.goal.com/en/news/10/italy/2012/11/10/3516798/-
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,630
Location
Dublin
What? You do realise that the teams Rio and Cantona were playing in were good Leeds sides yes?

It has plenty of relevance, Ki was outstanding for Korea and yet he's at Swansea and didnt cost the earth to sign. Its a sign of the times for Scottish football and Ki has proven more than Wanyama has just yet.
Still bears no relevance.

His point was that we shouldn't sign a player off of a team due to another not working out that we signed from that team. Don't know what you are on about. :confused:
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,544
Location
Hope, We Lose
Still bears no relevance.

His point was that we shouldn't sign a player off of a team due to another not working out that we signed from that team. Don't know what you are on about. :confused:
His point was that players from Scottish football arent always as good as they might look. Its a huge step up thats only got steeper over time
 
Status
Not open for further replies.